[02:50:25] Reedy: Why can't you run update.php? [03:03:06] Because Roan will be on the next flight to slap him in the face. [03:03:46] Krenair: Reedy will probably just offer RoanKattouw stroppwaffles before that can happen [03:57:32] On testwiki? [04:04:29] yes [07:29:38] I quipped that. [08:09:28] legoktm: but we don't have quips anymore! [08:20:19] the bash tool! [09:18:01] An error occured The error was reported with the following id: '1rrrT0GTfD1Vkj6zFL67' Please press and hold Ctrl and press F5 to reload this page, if the problem persists please send this error message to your webmaster: 'ErrorId: 1rrrT0GTfD1Vkj6zFL67 URL: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/wm16-wmcon-future UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Fedora; Linux x86_64; rv:47.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/47.0 Typ [09:18:07] eError: pad.collabClient is null in https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/javascripts/lib/ep_etherpad-lite/static/js/pad.js?callback=require.define at line 253' [09:18:10] https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/wm16-wmcon-future [09:42:34] I want to propose that a volunteer dev gets +2 on a few WMF deployed extensions, but not "+2 on all". Where should I do that? [09:43:33] siebrand: i think the current process is to file a phab task in some project [09:44:24] Repository-Ownership-Requests it seems [09:45:53] MatmaRex: Okay, so if I'm the owner, and another person who's also an owner agrees, that would be just fine? There's no red tape? [09:46:04] (And I'll just make sure there's a paper trail) [09:49:00] siebrand: probably. i imagine Operations or whoever get veto rights, if it's WMF-deployed code, but apart from that it should be just it [09:49:15] ktxbye :) [16:12:07] oh dear.. so many FOUCs everywhere.. Was most of the stylesheets recently moved to a JS module? [16:13:06] Glaisher: I'm seeing tons of FOUC too [16:13:22] The worst I saw is on rs.wikimedia.org, but pretty much any new wiki I visit has some [16:13:53] I'm seeing them on Meta on many pages [16:16:09] https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/292972/ looks related I think [16:16:29] Krinkle: Could that be the cause for so many FOUCs? ^ [16:35:49] Glaisher: Shouldn't be. [16:35:57] Glaisher: quiddity: Example? [16:38:04] Krinkle: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Ombox [16:38:17] I don't remember it being an issue previously. [16:38:35] It doesn't get properly styled without JavaScript. [16:38:56] Also this page https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Ombox&action=history [16:39:07] the top most revision's border and background color [16:39:36] Or maybe that is a JS thing so ignore that [21:07:08] hi, checkuser-wiki doesn't seem to load a skin at all [21:07:47] when I turn on webdeveloper tools I don't seen any 404's or something, just no loading of css at all [21:10:26] it actually loads https://checkuser.wikimedia.org/w/load.php?debug=false&lang=en&modules=ext.tmh.thumbnail.styles%7Cext.uls.nojs%7Cext.visualEditor.desktopArticleTarget.noscript%7Cmediawiki.legacy.commonPrint%2Cshared%7Cmediawiki.raggett%2CsectionAnchor%7Cmediawiki.skinning.interface%7Csite.styles%7Cskins.vector.styles&only=styles&skin=vector [21:10:39] it's not helping though :P [21:12:19] akoopal, is it broken when logged in? [21:12:26] yes [21:12:54] and when going to preferences and previewing other skins same junk [21:13:05] already typing a phabricator-task [21:15:44] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T138537 [21:19:40] works in debug mode, heh