[01:08:47] robla, hi, around? [01:13:19] hi, what's up? [01:13:55] * robla waves at yurik [01:15:16] hey robla, wrt RFC - i have one big proposal (tabular data), and one tiny branch from there - which is to host GeoJson data (absolutely the same way, same technology, same approach). [01:15:36] the maps community has been asking about this as much as for tabular data, possibly more [01:15:52] and I see both really going hand-in-hand [01:17:11] i think we should combine the discussion, or rather, structure it as "proposed storage solution" + "proposed social solution" + "specific use cases (tabular, geojson, ...?)" [01:21:40] * yurik waves back at robla [01:21:40] yurik: I think people already have problems following what you've put out there. Are you saying we should double/triple/quadruple that, including things that aren't yet in the form of RFCs? [01:23:51] robla, not in the slightest :) I am proposing that we should consider this as a slightly more generic "data storage approach" rather than "only tabular data discussion" -- basically we are discussing two things - is it ok to store any data this way (JSON to be more exact), and 2 - is the proposed JSON structure ok for Tabular data [01:25:04] if we don't have time to also cover geojson (which is much simpler because it is already well defined), we can leave it for the next week. [01:25:30] geojson would reuse the first discussion, and only expand on the second portion [01:27:22] the reason i want to add it is because there is a lot of asks from the community about this -- apparently wikivoyage community has already started doing something like that with GPX (xml-based geo tracks) [01:27:48] but I actually implemented both geojson and tabular at the same time at Israel hackathon [01:28:08] i thought tabular is more important - simply because it will affect bigger audience [01:30:16] I think it's fine to talk about both; we're not planning on having a meeting where we declare consensus on anything, but I'm mainly trying to advise about what the most productive use of the time would be [01:31:08] (and that is, of course, merely my 2 cents, which is possibly not even worth 2 cents) :-) [01:31:32] nah, you have been around long enough, i'm sure there is some interest on those original 2 cents :) [01:32:08] where is the GeoJSON stuff defined? [01:32:34] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GeoJSON [01:33:18] robla, ^, and we actually already use in it maps - whenever you write ... or ..., the "..." is geojson [01:33:33] enabled on wikivoyage for now, will be enabled everywhere else soonish [01:33:47] i basically don't want to store it there, but instead store it in separate pages [01:33:57] whenever it can be shared between pages/wikis [01:43:14] hmm...ok, my dinner is ready, but I'm happy to continue this conversation a little more asynchronously on https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/E213 [01:46:07] robla, bon appetit, will do [01:46:22] basile, sleepy time :) [04:52:12] Hello. Are user preferences on a wiki, specifically notifs for the Thanks extension, exposed via the MediaWiki API? i.e, can I query for a user's preferences somehow? [07:16:05] darthbhyrava: meta=userinfo&uiprop=options I believe [07:16:19] darthbhyrava: but you can only query for the current logged in user's preferences, not anyones preferences [07:19:06] " "echo-subscriptions-web-edit-thank": true," - legoktm thanks! [07:21:25] legoktm: is there no way in which I can a random user's thank preferences at all? [07:21:39] no, that's considered private informatoin [07:21:43] ^ *query a random ... [07:21:54] information* [07:23:20] Ah, thanks. [16:02:09] Dereckson: Thanks for the ping. I left a reply on your talk page. [17:24:42] Glaisher: thanks for the reply. [18:32:46] How can I use the MediaWiki API to determine if a particular edit has been made by an anonymous user? [18:37:17] darthbhyrava: assuming you have the revision id of the edit (e.g. 719175348 for this revision: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lowell,_North_Carolina&oldid=719175348) [18:37:20] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ApiSandbox#action=query&format=json&prop=revisions&revids=719175348&rvprop=user [18:37:55] I do have the rev_id of the user. So this would do, definitely. Thanks! [18:37:59] (you can check up to 50 revisions at once by separating the ids with '|': https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ApiSandbox#action=query&format=json&prop=revisions&revids=719175348%7C703985375&rvprop=user) [18:38:16] edits by anonymous users will have "anon" set in the output, edits by registered users won't [18:39:48] OKay. :) [19:26:38] darthbhyrava: the rev_id for anonymous users will always be 0... [19:31:54] legoktm, isn't that user_id? [19:32:02] Will rev_id also be 0? [19:46:28] darthbhyrava: errr sorry, ignore me. I confused rev_id and rev_user [19:46:45] Ah, cool. That's fine.