[06:37:32] <snitch>	 [[Tech]]; Username Violation; Fused 2 sections and marked it as unsigned.; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=14991649&oldid=14984946&rcid=7102146
[15:00:15] <Zhaofeng_Li>	 Status update. Looks like all WMF wikis except zhwp have been unblocked in China. Business as usual.
[18:13:47] <MusikAnimal>	 hello, is there a way to publicly see the .php configuration of a wiki? In particular, I'm curious what these values are on enwiki: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:AbuseFilter#Configuration
[18:17:23] <sjoerddebruin>	  MusikAnimal: https://github.com/wikimedia/operations-mediawiki-config/blob/master/wmf-config/abusefilter.php
[18:17:50] <MusikAnimal>	 sjoerddebruin: nice, is that for enwiki, though?
[18:18:05] <sjoerddebruin>	 They are listed under "case 'enwiki':"
[18:18:18] <sjoerddebruin>	 It's all the wiki's in the Wikimedia cluster.
[18:18:27] <MusikAnimal>	 there we go. Thank you!
[18:18:56] <sjoerddebruin>	 np
[18:19:50] <MusikAnimal>	 Also did not realize we were using GitHub. I thought it was all Gerrit?
[18:23:00] <legoktm>	 MusikAnimal: github is a mirror
[18:23:17] <legoktm>	 https://noc.wikimedia.org/conf/highlight.php?file=abusefilter.php is a web view of what's deployed
[18:24:25] <MusikAnimal>	 wonderful, thanks!
[18:25:50] <MusikAnimal>	 actually, I don't see wgAbuseFilterConditionLimit in there?
[18:26:22] <MusikAnimal>	 maybe 1000 is just the default
[18:27:37] <MusikAnimal>	 sorry, can't read, it is the default per https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:AbuseFilter#Configuration That's the one I'm most curious about. I wonder with the more powerful machinery we have these days if that could be increased
[18:28:46] <legoktm>	 MusikAnimal: If it's not in that file, it uses the default
[19:00:44] <MusikAnimal>	 anyone fiddling with testwiki? ok if you are... just curious. the "show changes" preview feature isn't working
[19:01:08] <MusikAnimal>	 I get a bunch of parser function syntax in the title
[19:07:27] <Krenair>	 only on specific pages, I assume?
[19:08:31] <Krenair>	 those with {{DISPLAYTITLE:some random wikitext here}} or templates which do this
[19:09:43] <MusikAnimal>	 ah I see
[19:20:03] <Krenair>	 can you confirm?
[19:32:07] <MusikAnimal>	 Krenair: no this page didn't use {{DISPLAYTITLE}} actually, but the "show changes" is working now
[19:32:23] * Krenair shrugs
[19:32:36] <MusikAnimal>	 I've worked on this page before, that's why I figured someone was testing something
[19:32:46] <MusikAnimal>	 all good now :)
[22:42:45] <Seddon>	 is this a representation for page load time: https://grafana.wikimedia.org/dashboard/db/webpagetest?panelId=7&fullscreen&from=1448437571181&to=1449042371182&var-wiki=enwiki&var-browser=All&var-location=All&var-page=Facebook&var-view=firstView
[22:43:22] <Seddon>	 ?
[22:45:11] * Seddon pokes reedy
[22:48:28] * Seddon pokes tommoris
[23:27:55] <greg-g>	 Seddon: from when I asked about it a few days ago:
[23:27:57] <greg-g>	 18:06 <+   gilles> greg-g: I've just looked at it, the filmstrip here tells the story: http://wpt.wmftest.org/video/compare.php?tests=151202_ES_6Y-r:1-c:0  
[23:28:01] <greg-g>	 18:06 <+   gilles> the banner appears, then vanishes  
[23:28:03] <greg-g>	 18:07 <+   gilles> which is what causes the speedindex to increase. speedindex is the time it takes for the above-the-fold area to settle on its final form  
[23:28:06] <greg-g>	 18:08 <+   gilles> ah, rather, it's that the banner takes time to appear  
[23:28:09] <greg-g>	 18:08 <+   gilles> the video is easier to understand: http://wpt.wmftest.org/video/view.php?id=151202_4F_6R.1.0  
[23:28:12] <greg-g>	 18:09 <+   gilles> it means that while the banner is running the speedindex score is artificially bad, because the banner doesn't appear on pageload, but a bit later and pushes everything down  
[23:28:16] <greg-g>	 18:10 <+   gilles> what was time-to-article-above-the-fold is now time-to-banner
[23:28:19] <greg-g>	 from #wikimedia-perf