[00:00:18] <tgr>	 uh, nothing, I just expected it to be somewhere at the beginning :)
[00:02:08] <jzerebecki>	 tgr: as written instead of using mediawiki/vendor the CI would only use composer for master branches. which is actually also the direction the CI is being changed to.
[00:03:10] <jzerebecki>	 tgr: wikidata extensions are run this way in the CI. 
[00:03:12] <tgr>	 yes but that wouldn't really solve the multiple review problem, right?
[00:03:54] <jzerebecki>	 it does, but is currently missing the verification
[00:04:27] <jzerebecki>	 i.e. we only review when we commit to the dependency we maintain
[00:05:02] <tgr>	 uh, I should probably read the proposal more carefully instead of asking stupid questions
[00:05:31] <tgr>	 and probably not on the clock...
[00:06:12] <jzerebecki>	 feedback welcome
[00:06:17] * bd808 cracks manager whip in tgr's general direction ;)
[00:06:33] * jzerebecki detaches
[07:55:34] <snitch>	 [[Tech]]; ArchiverBot; Bot: Archiving 1 thread (older than 30 days) to [[Tech/Archives/2015]].; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=14477733&oldid=14461458&rcid=6972004
[08:55:16] <r054l13>	 tonythomas: Has the review process started already?
[09:05:55] <saper>	 r054l13: why are you asking? the result will be on 17th
[09:06:14] <r054l13>	 saper: well, i am just ...
[09:06:40] <saper>	 r054l13: work on microtasks in the meantime :)
[09:06:50] <r054l13>	 saper: i am
[09:07:15] <saper>	 I understand that you are excited, but the process needs to be fair to all
[09:09:04] <r054l13>	 wow, yes thats true. I am really excited about it :)
[09:10:47] <saper>	 so many great opportunities out there, that's fantastic
[09:11:09] <saper>	 r054l13: what are you working on currently?
[09:15:18] <r054l13>	 removing un-used i18n keys from CentralNotice extension :)
[09:15:18] <r054l13>	 saper: that is what i am doing currently 
[09:16:17] <saper>	 oh
[09:16:20] <saper>	 can be hard
[09:17:27] <r054l13>	 really, it is
[09:17:29] <r054l13>	 Well, i have fixed 2 bugs already, One in the Wikimedia-core and the other in Central notice and they are all 35+ lines of code :)
[09:17:30] <r054l13>	 but this one entails me searching through the Central Notice extension, its not easy :)
[09:17:50] <r054l13>	 Ohhh, and also, i have reported a bug :)
[09:17:53] <r054l13>	 You can search in phabricator to see my doings :)
[09:18:00] <r054l13>	 rosalieper is my handle
[09:18:17] <saper>	 yeah I know I prefer to ask instead of stalking hah
[09:20:39] <r054l13>	 saper: Ok
[09:20:42] <r054l13>	 just doing some sort of community bonding already :)
[15:55:56] <matt_flaschen>	 Isn't https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/diffusion/MW/browse/master/includes/utils/UIDGenerator.php;a8181b4a8e009b7f7ee2443179919ba21d217356$451 truncating it to the 46 least significant bytes?
[15:56:19] <matt_flaschen>	 ^ legoktm, stephanebisson, et al
[15:56:40] <matt_flaschen>	 Asking because we're having some issues with duplicate UIDs in Flow I'm trying to track down.
[22:54:58] <Volker_E>	 thedj_: thanks for pointing me further, but I don't necessarily get the connection.
[22:56:30] <Volker_E>	 thedj_: Is it meaning, a templater wants to have a CSS handle for being able not to touch any CSS/Less file at all?
[22:57:11] <Volker_E>	 thedj_: I'm talking about https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T24256#1786881