[06:11:03] Is it expected that searching "hard" doesn't find "hardest", e.g. summary of https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T90419 [06:29:04] Nemo_bis: yes :( https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T94338#1161585 [06:30:26] legoktm: well but that statement is rather generic [06:30:52] MySQL doesn't do tokenization but I don't remember if it does whole-word searches only [06:31:43] IIRC even the default MediaWiki search is smarter than this :) [06:39:28] Nemo_bis, MySQL can search "word+" in boolean mode [06:45:28] jynus: and can that be enabled in Phabricator? :) [06:46:10] Nemo_bis, it is not a question of "enabling it", it has to be developed [06:46:15] :-) [08:16:22] apergos and ops, did you receive purodha's email at ops-requests@rt.wikimedia.org? He needs help to login on phabricator; he's been getting various fatal errors for months now and there seems to be no light at the end of the tunnel [08:22:08] huh [08:22:21] we dont' check rt so much now but let me go look right this second [08:22:54] Nemo_bis: [08:25:11] thanks [08:29:01] Nemo_bis: that queue doesn't exist any more in rt [08:29:16] can he send directly to me? ariel @ etc [08:55:32] ok [09:18:46] I found an email for him, I'll try sending there too [15:03:14] Is this a known Windows virus affecting VisualEditor edits? https://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=66350968&oldid=63175836 [17:16:26] Nemo_bis: October 2014 edit. Known bug, fixed months ago. The 'virus' is called Microsoft Office. [17:16:48] James_F: yeah, I asked because it looked familiar :) [17:17:21] James_F: that's what I was assuming as well ("stupid MS Word or some such") but didn't know for sure :) [17:17:31] * James_F grins. [17:19:03] Is the first line a pattern one can look for to find all such edits? [17:19:30] I should probably cleanup some of "my" wikis [17:20:47] Unfortunately some browser plugins like to inject their crap into the document, not excluding VisualEditor [17:20:56] VE gets the blame for it of course [17:21:14] they are generally a pattern, yes [17:21:35] take a look at the blockers of https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T54327 [17:22:14] James_F, actually all of those blockers are resolved now... are we going to leave it open for a 'proper' solution? [17:22:45] Krenair: Eh. That was my intent. What do you think? [17:23:09] I would check with Roan, but... [17:24:24] I don't have any ideas for dealing with it in a better way. [17:26:14] "Not having a good idea right now" isn't the normal criterion for closing. :-) [20:13:21] How to remove the gadget from the list in the settings? Remove the line with its name from MediaWiki:Gadgets-definition but it is still there in the settings. [20:27:55] sunpriat, what wiki? [20:28:22] https://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Gadgets-definition&diff=70824620&oldid=70801264 [20:29:52] I think there's caching involved there, sunpriat [20:31:27] That is, I just need to wait? purge something will not need? [20:37:43] I'm not sure [20:38:13] I think it should be purging that automatically [20:39:27] js MediaWiki:Gadget-Highlightredirects.js and message MediaWiki:Gadget-Highlightredirects not necessarily delete? [20:47:13] Ok, thanks [20:47:56] Yeah I'm not sure what's going on there [21:38:10] Krenair: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/210260/ ? [21:38:54] legoktm, I wasn't sure it was an issue with gadgets at all [21:39:45] I checked the output of both Gadget::loadStructuredList and Preferences::getPreferences on ruwiki and couldn't find the removed gadget, but I could find other gadgets [21:40:49] yet it still shows up in the preferences gadgets list [22:13:54] Krenair: APC caching is local to the machine the code is run on [22:15:41] oh, I see what you mean [22:15:54] so it would have purged the cache on whatever mw host handled the edit? [22:26:13] Krenair: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/207730/