[13:46:52] <ricordisamoa>	 hi
[13:47:03] <ricordisamoa>	 how to restore an expired oauth client?
[13:47:06] <ricordisamoa>	 such as https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:OAuthListConsumers/view/010a0e693ad8fd9b223e115440f48e3c
[13:48:00] <ricordisamoa>	 I already asked at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Thread:Project:Current_issues/Workflow_for_OAuth_clients but only 1 reply
[13:51:24] <liangent>	 Request: GET http://git.wikimedia.org/, from 116.1.3.207 via cp1043 cp1043 ([208.80.154.241]:80), Varnish XID 1002773300
[13:51:24] <liangent>	 Error: 503, Service Unavailable at Wed, 15 Apr 2015 13:50:50 GMT
[13:52:16] <liangent>	 gr there's another ip :(
[13:53:18] <akosiaris>	 liangent: yeah, known. fixed
[13:55:59] <ricordisamoa>	 do I have to propose another one?
[13:56:27] <ricordisamoa>	 https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:OAuthConsumerRegistration/update/010a0e693ad8fd9b223e115440f48e3c won't let me update it
[14:03:05] <ricordisamoa>	 anyone?
[15:40:10] <ricordisamoa>	 Does anyone know what to do with an expired OAuth client?
[19:09:55] <MusikAnimal>	 hi, I'm unable to reproduce an edit conflict via the Edit API. I have set "starttimestamp" which let's say is 5 minutes ago, "endtimestamp" which is 1 minute ago, and let's say the page was last edited 3 minutes ago
[19:10:13] <MusikAnimal>	 for me I still get a "success" and it just overwrites the changed content
[19:10:55] <RoanKattouw>	 endtimestamp?
[19:10:59] <legoktm>	 anomie: ^
[19:10:59] <RoanKattouw>	 I thought it was basetimestamp?
[19:11:27] <MusikAnimal>	 yes sorry, I meant basetimestamp
[19:11:58] <anomie>	 MusikAnimal: I'll take a look in probably 50 minutes, in a meeting at the moment.
[19:12:18] <MusikAnimal>	 okay, looks like I messed my code some and got those mixed, let me verify this is still a problem first
[19:12:37] <anomie>	 Ping me if you get it figured out
[19:12:39] <MusikAnimal>	 I think it said endtimestamp in one place and base in the other =P
[19:12:44] <MusikAnimal>	 ok will do thanks!
[19:19:41] <MusikAnimal>	 anomie: no dice, basetimestamp was 2015-04-15T04:23:03Z and starttimestamp was 2015-04-15T19:15:42Z, I edited the page via the web at 19:16
[19:20:06] <MusikAnimal>	 https://test.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Rollback&action=history
[20:18:43] <anomie>	 MusikAnimal: Hrm. I just tried it on testwiki with my bot code and it properly detected the conflict with my simple test edit.
[20:19:02] <MusikAnimal>	 what does the response look like?
[20:19:54] <MusikAnimal>	 surely it still doesn't have a result with the value "Success"?
[20:20:12] <MusikAnimal>	 I'm having to deal with XML in Ruby which is a pain, not easy to inspect the response
[20:22:15] <anomie>	 MusikAnimal: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/P524
[20:26:38] <MusikAnimal>	 I must be missing something. My steps are to first run the script till it fetches the page, and hits the debugger, so now we have basetimestamp = last edit of page, and starttimestamp = now
[20:27:14] <MusikAnimal>	 which execution is still halted, I edit the page with a bunch of conflicting text and save it, then continue execution in the script
[20:27:47] <MusikAnimal>	 when the script goes to edit the page it passes in basetimestamp and starttimestamp, but evidently does not detect an edit conflict
[20:27:59] <MusikAnimal>	 under that scenario, an edit conflict should occur, no?
[20:28:35] <MusikAnimal>	 ^ anomie
[20:28:52] <anomie>	 MusikAnimal: Should, yes
[20:29:52] <MusikAnimal>	 and I'm not conflicting with the current user
[20:31:21] <MusikAnimal>	 ah, maybe it's the Ruby ediawiki API wrapper
[20:45:00] <MusikAnimal>	 yeah it was the Ruby gem I was using. It calls its Create method with the option overwrite=true, not helpful
[20:45:42] <MusikAnimal>	 anyways thanks for the help anomie!
[20:46:07] <anomie>	 MusikAnimal: No problem!