[03:50:21] i can log into all wikis bar enwiki, i use http , i'm logged out if i go to any page on https biut if i add "https" to the url, i'm logged in..what kind if an effing bug is this? [03:54:50] http is evil [04:34:24] no, you are.. :P [08:52:09] I am Orthogonal1 on en.wikipedia and ja.wikipedia [08:52:25] However, on en.wiktionary and commons, I am Orthogonal [08:53:24] Someone else is Orthogonal on en.wikipedia, so with the unified account migration, my commons and wiktionary accounts are going to be renamed. [08:54:03] I saw that it was impossible to merge different usernames on the frequently asked questions page [08:55:08] However, would it be possible to merge my entries for Orthogonal and Orthogonal1 into a new account, Orthogonal2? [09:25:56] orthogonal: you can get your "Orthogonal" accounts renamed to "Orthogonal1" and merge them [09:26:16] orthogonal: post your request on https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/SRUC [09:31:29] Thanks Nemo_bis. I didn't know that was possible either. [09:32:55] Nemo_bis:Okay, thanks. I'll do that. [09:43:08] Niharika: it's soon going to be impossible ;) old bureaucrat tricks [09:45:02] Strange. One would think these things would get easier with time. [09:49:01] Niharika: accounts surgery isn't what I'd call an easy thing [09:50:05] Nemo_bis: I suppose with email login in place, it'd be pretty easy to authenticate multiple accounts and merge them. But not sure when that's gonna happen, if ever. [09:53:08] Niharika: we already use email to merge accounts [09:53:21] I have at least a dozen of accounts using my email address though :) [09:54:15] Nemo_bis: Whoa. A dozen?! Why'd you ever need a dozen? I have two and I have to keep logging in and out. It's a mess. [09:54:57] To avoid imitators [09:55:09] Nemo_bis Nemo_ter Nemo_quater etc. Plus bots. Plus testing [09:55:09] If they already use emails to merge accounts, it could very well be an automated thing without any manual interference, I think. [09:55:45] Nemo_bis: Ah. Interesting. [10:08:48] Done! [17:27:04] i just got spammed with emails from gerrit [17:28:24] lojjik, emails about what? [17:30:27] commits [17:30:32] that happend several months ago [17:30:50] phabricator [17:32:26] why is gerrit sending you phabricator emails? [17:37:48] <^d> gerrit isn't, it's phabricator sending e-mails about old gerrit commits [17:37:57] <^d> it's a stupid bug, you can ignore them [20:50:02] does anyone know why the pulldown menu of languages (in the upload wizard) includes "Eastern Canadian" ? [20:50:58] Dragonfly6-7: i think it's https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eastern_Canadian_Inuktitut_language&redirect=no [20:51:10] an Inuit language [20:51:50] Eastern Inuktitut, as opposed to Western Inuktitut. Okay. [20:52:00] Dragonfly6-7: "ike" is a supported MediaWiki locale [20:52:46] Since 2012 even [20:53:04] thank you [20:53:15] perhaps the pulldown menu should say "Eastern Inuktitut", then? [20:53:30] it does sound better, yes [20:54:00] Well, or 2007 even 'ᐃᓄᒃᑎᑐᑦ' [20:57:21] Not sure what's the correct one http://www.unicode.org/cldr/charts/27/summary/en.html [20:57:33] The "Cans" script is considered "Aspirational" by CLDR [20:57:55] 'aspirational' ? [20:59:11] Not sure what the criteria are exactly [20:59:34] But it looks like 5e396d428 introduced ike-latn and ike-cans to avoid quarrels on what should be the script for "iu" [21:02:57] Nemo_bis: The scripts listed in Table 6, Aspirational Use Scripts are scripts would otherwise qualify as Limited Use (see Table 7, Limited Use Scripts), but have strong current efforts to increase their usage. [21:03:09] like "we would like to see them used" ? [21:03:49] it's above "limited use" but below "recommended" http://unicode.org/reports/tr31/#Aspirational_Use_Scripts [21:04:02] Like "there is no written history so nobody can figure out whether it's an invention or a real thing" [21:04:22] heh, i guess [21:05:05] Like Italian before 960 ;) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Placiti_Cassinesi [21:05:26] and they call it "Canadian Aboriginal" here. [21:21:13] Dragonfly6-7: https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special_language_codes&diff=11631128&oldid=10744690 [21:21:24] At some point we'll put some order ;)