[00:01:47] works now.. someone fixed it? [00:08:05] <^d> jeblad: I didn't do anything :p [00:08:15] <^d> magic server fairies? [00:09:15] <^d> jeblad: Oh, the page edit was recent? Well probably just had to wait for the job to update it. [00:09:24] <^d> It's not instant, it's just "near real time" [00:10:46] <^d> which is better than "once a day when we're lucky" :p [00:12:28] did a two word search and a three word search, both failed [00:13:10] The three word search should have several matches, it only found one [00:15:11] Whatever, perhaps I remember wrong and I never used "demotilgang" previously. [00:15:21] Thanks for the help! :) [00:15:42] <^d> You're welcome. If you think you do indeed spot a bug toss it in Phabricator under the CirrusSearch project [01:45:51] O_O [08:20:18] Is this proper behaviour? http://commons.wikimedia.org//w/api.php?action=query&list=recentchanges&format=xml&rcstart=20150122000951&rcend=20150123000951&rcdir=newer&rcnamespace=6&rclimit=20&rctype=log [08:21:06] the output always looks like [08:24:28] "Formatting of continuation data will be changing soon. To continue using the current formatting, use the 'rawcontinue' parameter. To begin using the new format, pass an empty string for 'continue' in the initial query." [08:25:55] Appending &rawcontinue does not change a thing... [08:25:56] http://commons.wikimedia.org//w/api.php?action=query&list=recentchanges&format=xml&rcstart=20150122000951&rcend=20150123000951&rcdir=newer&rcnamespace=6&rclimit=500&rctype=log&rawcontinue [08:35:30] Actually there are some file names appearing very sparsely. Looks like a bug: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T88783 [21:04:43] is Parsoid available to user scripts? [21:06:11] kind of [21:06:54] I only found http://parsoid-lb.eqiad.wikimedia.org/ but that's not reachable with ajax requests from Wikipedia [21:08:02] MartijnH: here's a script that allegedly uses parsoid: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jackmcbarn/editProtectedHelper.js [21:08:07] (docs: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jackmcbarn/editProtectedHelper) [21:08:15] "allegedly"? [21:08:16] it does use parsoid [21:09:23] aha [21:09:24] http://parsoid-prod.wmflabs.org/ [21:09:42] winning [21:09:42] prod.wmflabs sounds slightly contradictory [21:10:08] I don't particularly care how it sounds :) [21:13:20] MartijnH: what are you building? [21:13:58] jackmcbarn: so far, I'm just toying. I'd like to make a "parsoid clean" roundtrip checker on save/preview [21:15:31] really, it's more of an "I've got an API and I wonder how I can use it" thing than a "this thing will be useful, but I need Parsoid for it" thing [21:15:46] also, I'm trying to learn JS [21:16:27] so far, I'm under the impression it's a sham ;) [21:25:15] MartijnH: it is [21:27:10] legoktm: I'm slowly getting the feeling that that whole "it's actually like Lisp" thing is just aimed at raising the self esteem of those JS programmers that don't actually know Lisp [21:27:38] I don't think it's like lisp, it's just terrible :P [21:50:20] MartijnH: Hmph, I thought for sure that http://parsoid-lb.eqiad.wikimedia.org/ would have CORS headers set but it doesn't :( [21:50:56] RoanKattouw: even if it had, it would be requesting http from https which won't fly anyway [22:32:27] Oh right [22:32:32] Yeah gwicke has been saying we need https there [22:32:45] You can also abuse the visualeditor API module to get Parsoid HTML [22:41:26] restbase will have https from the start [22:45:33] I've been meaning to moan about that issue for a while.