[01:26:17] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Global_AbuseFilter#Can.E2.80.99t_log_in [01:27:37] greg-g (just pinging last active user in channel): any idea what this means? [03:31:25] is anyone even here? [03:33:16] yes [03:34:39] TimStarling: If you're not too busy, would you mind looking into https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Global_AbuseFilter#Can.E2.80.99t_log_in ? [03:38:29] nice to have the exact timestamp [03:42:03] what is his/her name? [03:42:58] Artomo I guess [03:44:52] Yes [03:45:11] [or at least that's what he/she claims] [03:52:36] I haven't managed to find any correlated log entry though [03:53:06] I would say file a bug except the bug tracker is broken [03:53:23] both? [03:54:10] phabricator is totally down and bugzilla is in read-only mode [03:54:30] due to migration from bugzilla to phabricator which is apparently in progress [06:15:37] The user interface of Bugzilla apparently doesn't understand read-only. [06:16:04] The text inputs and form controls look as though they would work. [06:16:09] Maybe that's a skin thing. [07:07:45] Can't we just email task@phabricator.wikimedia.org and suspend email delivery until phabricator is able to process them? :) [08:52:52] Nemo_bis: that might work, or possibly it works immediately and you'll break the consecutive numbering :p [16:07:03] Any shell users with DB access around? [16:07:42] Krenair: Sure [16:07:50] hoo, pm [17:26:04] Hi. Anyone around? [17:28:28] Krenair: [17:28:38] huh: No, we're all dead [17:28:46] marktraceur: Hi! [17:28:52] Can you please look into this: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Global_AbuseFilter ? [17:28:55] last section [17:29:06] I will, but I may not be helpful [17:29:09] it's not actually related to the AbuseFilter, someone just happened to report the error there [17:29:20] they can't log in and get a 503 [17:29:51] Hrm [17:30:09] this section https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Global_AbuseFilter#Can.E2.80.99t_log_in [17:30:14] Yes, I see it [17:30:31] Reedy: 503 on login for the only administrator on idowiki, any thoughts? (see above link) [17:31:48] I think it's a serious problem [17:32:04] they also don't have SUL, so they can't log in that way [17:35:09] huh, do they not? I've logged in with my global account... :/ [17:35:42] Cookies52: Oh, I meant the user doesn't have SUL [17:35:48] obviously the wiki has SUL [17:36:15] this is the user: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/Artomo [17:36:40] huh, ok... [17:36:45] misunderstood :/ [17:36:59] I was able to log in there as well [17:37:53] There appear to be 0 local abuse filters affecting it, and no recent hits at all... [17:38:28] yeah, something strange is afoot [17:38:42] Abuse filters don't prevent logging in anyway [17:38:52] but I think they can match account creations [17:39:49] huh, they have the technical ability to, I believe from my tests.... [17:40:07] ?! [17:40:13] ummmm [17:40:36] legoktm: abuse filters can't prevent logging in, can they? [17:40:40] no [17:41:01] OK, good. I was scared for a moment [17:41:03] 503. legoktm: isn't that what happened in Nick's broken SUL case? [17:41:17] oh right.... I must have been playing with something else.... [17:41:18] yeaaaah, that's what I'm looking into right now :/ [17:41:29] I managed to lock myself out of my private instance :/ [17:41:48] Glaisher: you're online at this hour? [17:41:54] Cookies52: delete the row! [17:41:58] huh: why not? [17:42:48] I can see that they logged in fine on iowiki. [17:42:57] Glaisher, yeah, I did in the end [17:44:22] Glaisher: It doesn't appear to be the same issue. [17:44:32] hm [17:44:43] though I bet we could fix it the same way >.< [18:30:18] legoktm: what caused the problem? [18:30:28] I couldn't figure it out [18:38:41] huh: are we sure a browser problem must be ruled out? (it seems so from the description, but but) [18:38:54] what kind of problem? [18:39:00] No idea [18:39:07] I already asked about cookies [18:39:24] But on many websites it's easy to get 5xx errors with NoScript and similar