[05:05:58] <Carmela>	 legoktm, Nemo_bis: Unifications?
[05:06:44] <legoktm>	 We recently deployed code that when logging in, creates a global account if all the unattached accounts for your name match your password and/or email
[05:07:02] <legoktm>	 previously we only tried to attach matching accounts if you already had a global account
[05:08:03] <Carmela>	 Ah, we do that for new accounts, right?
[05:08:31] <Carmela>	 So now we're doing it for account creation and login?
[05:09:22] <Carmela>	 Also, duplicatebug has gone inactive? :-(
[05:09:42] <legoktm>	 No, new accounts are automatically global unless there are unattached accounts and no global in which case the new account is also unattached
[05:09:55] <legoktm>	 this just runs on login
[05:10:25] <Carmela>	 I'm not sure I followed that sentence.
[05:10:28] <Carmela>	 But good news in any case.
[05:12:02] <legoktm>	 basically there are users who have accounts on multiple wikis, and never bothered to visit Special:MergeAccount. We now do that step automatically if it's "safe" (you own all the accounts) when you login
[05:12:22] <Carmela>	 Got it.
[06:30:40] <Nemo_bis>	 Carmela: duplicatebug just consolidated his duplicate usernames :)
[06:31:36] <Carmela>	 He didn't get an actual merge?
[06:31:39] <Carmela>	 I think that can be done.
[06:31:50] <Carmela>	 Good to hear he's still around, though.
[06:35:13] <Nemo_bis>	 Perhaps will do in phabricator, or perhaps doesn't want to
[09:38:50] <tuxnani>	 Hi anyone to help me with TWA -  The Wikipedia Adventure?
[20:03:02] <Ainali>	 It was just noticed on svwp village pump that http://stats.wikimedia.org is down
[20:04:11] <Ainali>	 And then I noticed that tbat one is not listed on http://status.wikimedia.org/ 
[20:08:34] <Nemo_bis>	 !log 22.03 < Ainali> It was just noticed on svwp village pump that http://stats.wikimedia.org is down
[20:08:44] <morebots>	 Logged the message, Master
[20:10:52] <Nemo_bis>	 since about 6 UTC? https://ganglia.wikimedia.org/latest/?r=day&cs=&ce=&c=Miscellaneous+eqiad&h=stat1001.wikimedia.org&tab=m&vn=&hide-hf=false&mc=2&z=medium&metric_group=ALLGROUPS
[20:13:33] <hoo>	 looks like apache2 on it died
[20:13:53] <hoo>	 but puppet is not set up to auto start apache there
[20:14:35] * hoo doesn't have shell on it, so can only guess
[20:34:03] <Nemo_bis>	 hoo|away: submit a patch for apache restart? :)
[20:34:18] <Nemo_bis>	 Ainali: remember to file a bug if it's not solved before you go to bed
[21:10:57] <YairRand_>	 anyone know if there's any way to disable jquery.IME on a page?
[21:16:21] <YairRand_>	 mw.ime.disable() doesn't seem to actually work
[21:16:44] <YairRand_>	 nor does $("body").off( "focus.ime", "**" )
[21:16:57] <YairRand_>	 or $("body").off( "focus.ime", mw.config.get( 'wgULSImeSelectors' ).join( ', ' ) );
[21:17:09] <YairRand_>	 or window.wgULSImeSelectors = [];
[21:19:20] <YairRand_>	 or simply deleting mw.ime or $.ime
[21:19:27] <Nemo_bis>	 Disabling completely or by default? On a page as in a single page for everyone?
[21:19:40] <ori>	 YairRand_: looks like a bug
[21:19:43] <YairRand_>	 on a single page, using javascript
[21:19:47] <ori>	 https://github.com/wikimedia/jquery.ime/blob/master/src/jquery.ime.selector.js none of that cares for active
[21:21:30] <YairRand_>	 I'm writing a script that moves the selection around quite a bit, and I'd rather not have the performance killed by the little keyboard icons jumping around all over the place
[21:38:42] <YairRand_>	 filed a bug about the problem with mw.ime.disable. anyone have any ideas for how else one could feasibly disable it?
[21:39:07] * ori gives it a shot
[22:19:59] <harej>	 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:FormWizard << what is the likelihood this will be enabled on the english wikipedia in my lifetime?
[22:25:21] <se4598_2>	 harej: as far as I can see, this is Gadget, which can be used/installed by the community (more precisely admins) on their own.
[22:25:57] <harej>	 Which is weird, because doesn't that mean, then, that for the form to be useful, you have to enable the gadget in your settings?
[22:26:16] <harej>	 What usability sense does that make? "You can use this convenient, streamlined form, but first you need to go into your settings and check off an arcane setting."
[22:27:41] <se4598_2>	 harej: Gadgets can be defined as enabled by default for all users (opt-out), or not (opt-in)
[22:28:16] <harej>	 I see. So, in lobbying my fellow Wikipedians to have this enabled, I'd also have to convince them to hav it enabled as an opt-out gadget.
[22:31:22] <harej>	 Anyways, thanks!
[22:31:41] <se4598_2>	 harej: one additional point, this is still in development
[22:32:07] <harej>	 That is so, but it's currently being used and it seems stable to me.
[22:32:14] <se4598_2>	 so, they'll better create a gadget, which loads the current version from the meta pages
[22:32:57] <harej>	 Sure.
[22:33:11] <saper>	 harej: maybe this could work from your local common.js or Greasemonkey?
[22:33:32] <se4598_2>	 but this isn't so perfomance for all users, expecially if it is opt-out, they have to decide
[22:33:45] <harej>	 But I don't want it for myself so much as I want others to be able to use it.
[22:36:14] <saper>	 So socialist :)