[01:46:39] <jackmcbarn>	 what consensus is necessary to get a config change made to mediawikiwiki?
[01:46:59] <Krenair>	 jackmcbarn, what change do you want to make?
[01:47:31] <jackmcbarn>	 Krenair: currently, the abusefilter there, when "block" is used as an action, indefblocks everyone. i want to make it only block for 1 month if the target is an IP
[01:48:54] <Krenair>	 it's used only for spam at the moment
[01:49:12] <jackmcbarn>	 i know. i want to do something about all the IPs that post Flow spam
[01:49:38] <Krenair>	 see https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Project:Requests#Other_requests_and_requests_for_comments
[01:49:58] <jackmcbarn>	 Krenair: oh wow, i had no idea someone already posted what was basically what i was asking
[08:16:32] <snitch>	 [[Tech]]; ArchiverBot; Bot: Archiving 1 thread (older than 30 days) to [[Tech/Archives/2014]].; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=9713778&oldid=9705051&rcid=5540212
[10:40:33] <Cookies52>	 anyone else here? got a MediaWiki related question relevent to enwiki...
[10:41:23] <Cookies|eating>	 Would it be possible for members of a certain group to add people to it
[10:42:00] <Cookies|eating>	 ie. If In was in group "test", could MW be made to allow me to add others to the group?
[10:43:11] <DanielK_WMDE>	 Cookies|eating: possible, but iirc not easy. as far as i know, there is just a right to assign user groups - any group. 
[10:43:47] <DanielK_WMDE>	 implementing something like an "invite" permission so members of a group could "invite" others to the same group is possible, but would need some core changes, i think.
[10:43:53] <DanielK_WMDE>	 file a feature request?
[10:49:04] <Cookies|eating>	 DanielK_WMDE, not really worth it, it was just a suggestion made at an RfC I'm involved with
[10:49:42] <Cookies|eating>	 But as we have Admins that are members of the proposed group, should be simple enough
[10:49:45] <Cookies|eating>	 thanks though
[11:00:28] <Svetlana>	 Cookies52, yes?
[11:00:46] <Cookies52>	 Svetlana, ?
[11:00:53] <Svetlana>	 <Cookies52> anyone else here? got a MediaWiki related question relevent to enwiki...
[11:00:55] <Svetlana>	 <Svetlana> Cookies52, yes?
[11:01:08] <Svetlana>	 oh, sorry, missed your other nick here
[11:01:12] <Cookies52>	 Svetlana, haha
[17:08:15] <EdSaperia>	 Hi, can someone tell me the name of the tool that allows you to do inline edits? So you don't have to open the editor for the whole page, just for one part.
[17:09:57] <Krenair>	 One section?
[17:10:09] <EdSaperia>	 I think it might have been even smaller, maybe one paragraph?
[17:10:10] <EdSaperia>	 Not sure
[17:10:32] <MatmaRex>	 EdSaperia: probably QuickEdit
[17:38:07] <EdSaperia>	 Can I make a website that lets a user log in and edit en.wp? (using OAuth I think?)
[17:38:46] <Reedy>	 Yeah
[17:40:12] <EdSaperia>	 Great, I hoped it would be so.
[23:20:41] <harej>	 Is this the proper channel for CentralNotice? If not, where is?
[23:21:01] <Reedy>	 Depends what's up...
[23:21:17] <harej>	 So I have an ongoing campaign, WSM September 2014, but I am not sure if it's working.
[23:22:10] <harej>	 It's enabled, it's tied to a banner and it works, but I haven't seen it load at all.
[23:22:34] <harej>	 Thinking it was because I had dismissed it when we ran the banner in an earlier campaign, I tried it out in Incognito Mode and still nothing.
[23:22:48] <andre__>	 where would I be supposed to see it?
[23:23:04] <harej>	 in the United States, on English-language Wikipedia (and Commons and Meta)
[23:23:23] <harej>	 basically all the same settings for Wiki Loves Monuments, but for United States (and Minor Outlying Islands, the US Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico)
[23:25:54] <jeremyb>	 harej, i'll look
[23:26:00] <harej>	 thanks bloke
[23:26:31] <jeremyb>	 harej, in the meantime, care to dig me up an affcom member? :)
[23:26:39] <jeremyb>	 quid pro quo
[23:26:41] <jeremyb>	 :P
[23:26:48] <harej>	 Kirill Lokshin is an AffCom member
[23:27:00] <jeremyb>	 oh, good point
[23:28:34] <jeremyb>	 btw, when was the last time you changed anything related to the banner?
[23:28:51] <jeremyb>	 and are you done editwarring? why don't you guys use the new edit summary feature?
[23:29:02] <jeremyb>	 (harej && Romaine)
[23:29:33] <harej>	 The entire banner was created last night; last change was sometime either right before midnight or slightly after midnight, I want to say 12:30, that's in U.S. EDT to be clear.
[23:29:46] <harej>	 And our edit war should be done, yes. Misunderstanding on both of our parts.
[23:30:12] <jeremyb>	 right. i read the talk page
[23:43:43] <jeremyb>	 harej, percent? calendar says logged in+anon
[23:43:53] <harej>	 I think it's set to 100%?
[23:44:56] <jeremyb>	 idk. anyway, you want both logged in and anon?
[23:45:03] <harej>	 Yes.
[23:45:11] <jeremyb>	 ok
[23:49:27] <jeremyb>	 harej, so, test again?
[23:49:35] <harej>	 :D
[23:49:38] <harej>	 What'd you fix?
[23:50:09] <jeremyb>	 check the log!
[23:50:10] <jeremyb>	 :)
[23:50:58] <harej>	 Buh, that was weird.
[23:51:08] <harej>	 I thought hitting "enabled" was enough to do the trick
[23:51:13] <harej>	 Thank you