[00:15:17] thanks _joe_ and thanks ori fo fwd :) http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2014-August/078034.html [00:15:45] i messed up the thread :/ [00:16:03] but yeah, happy times [00:19:57] valhallasw`mania: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66989#c4 [02:14:58] serious question, please allow the option to uncheck "Always use a secure connection when logged in" at login.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Preferences [02:15:33] comets: please file a bug in bugzilla.wikimedia.org [02:15:44] if that helps.. [02:17:31] which cat, wikimedia? [02:34:17] https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69319 [02:36:43] Why would you want to do that? [02:39:26] using https shouldn't be slowing you down like that... [02:48:00] oh it does.... [02:52:10] as i mentioned before, y is it necessary to use wiki on a secured connection? the "last" time wiki got hacked was not even a hack but a developer making a mistake which led to them "enforcing" https for no reason ... [02:52:46] its wiki, not my bank account/personal email etc... [02:55:10] p858snake|l: depends on your connection, I know where I work https sucks [02:55:41] Betacommand: They are most likely doing MITM for inspection [02:55:52] https and proxied connections will cause some slowness [02:56:23] p858snake|l: its a LOT more than just some it adds 5-10 seconds lag per page [02:58:29] indeed, i load my enwiki watchlist in 5 seconds flat on http, its takes closer to 15 seconds on https.. [03:02:18] please file a "https is slow" bug [03:02:41] svetlana: its not on the wmf end [03:02:52] Betacommand: then he needs to nag his isp. [03:03:15] it's unacceptable, not explained, and a second folk who asks "let me go http only" for this stupid reason. [03:03:40] svetlana: in most cases its a waste of time [03:03:41] I understand it's a valid feature request for a website, but for /https is slow/ reason? why on earth would it be? [03:03:55] that's just stupid for it to be slow. [03:05:09] svetlana: depending on the network config there may be nothing that can be done thus users are either forced to use HTTPS for basic browsing and grind to a halt, or stop using the wiki [03:05:48] would it happen to double the quantity of wmf servers that provide https? [03:05:54] s/happen/help/ [03:06:15] provide more of them close to trouble areas or something [03:06:45] svetlana: you dont get it, the problem isnt with the WMF [03:07:09] I'm trying to think of ways to remedy it. if adding a new server next door doesn't help, then it's a modem problem? [03:07:35] svetlana: ... do you know networking at all? [03:08:05] yes, but nothing at all related to https. I only know that someone needs to encrypt content before sending it, but I wouldn't expect the overheads to be noticeable [03:09:20] svetlana: depending on the network config a HTTP request may go through 3-4 hops before reaching the internet and another 3-4 on the way back [03:10:36] only 3-4? that's a small number. in other words, you may want to give me something to read (something that explains about hops and routing of https content) [03:10:42] svetlana: I know for example most request where I work get routed through our central network to HQ, though our security box, and then through our web proxy box [03:11:02] my first thought here is "but both http and https have this fate". [03:11:29] svetlana: encrypted data is harder to process and causes more checks [03:11:56] I see. [03:13:55] svetlana: https adds 1-2 round trips just to configure the secure connection [03:14:53] thus your doubling or tripping the connection time in some cases [03:15:09] mm. I wonder whether it's possible to establish a connection once and maintain it, and use ajax to retrieve new information. [03:17:14] svetlana: more often than not the proxies between them will not keep it open that long [03:17:38] svetlana: better solution, dont force https in environments that cant handle it well [03:18:57] svetlana: another example where this doesnt work china [08:46:20] _joe_: I found another page useful for edge cases hhvm tests :p https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help_talk:Page_name#Slow_to_load [09:12:37] Keegan: hi. [09:12:46] Keegan: do you read JavaScript? [09:14:56] Reedy: Could you merge this backport before Tuesday, please? https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/153027/1 It fix the Page: pages edit interface that is currently broken in 1.24wmf16 [09:16:33] Ori: <3 [09:31:35] valhallasw`mania: where are you? [09:31:43] yuvipanda: Creative Ways to Alienate Women Online: A How-to Guide for Wikipedians [09:31:52] valhallasw`mania: aaaah [09:31:53] which should be starting in a minute or so [09:31:59] valhallasw`mania: right [09:32:20] I'll probably be in the garden room afterwards [09:32:30] do you need me? <3 [09:33:03] valhallasw`mania: should meet up and give you a hug ;) [09:33:21] valhallasw`mania: not at other sister projects? [09:33:24] hugggsssss \o/ [09:33:41] valhallasw`mania: I'm looking at «Wikipedians» word there. [09:33:51] svetlana: #care [09:34:01] I don't regret missing Wikimania. [09:34:18] if you take issue with 'wikipedians', you're completely missing the point [10:35:43] Nemo_bis: how about a page of pointers like this? https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Server_roles [10:36:18] whym: hi. [10:36:48] svetlana: hi [10:37:01] whym: do you read javascript? [10:37:27] svetlana: not an expert but to some extent. [10:38:04] whym: when you have a moment, I'd like some feedback on the script structure and quality. https://test.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gryllida/js/feedbackstuff.js [10:44:46] svetlana: I recommend jshint as described at www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Coding_conventions/JavaScript [10:48:29] svetlana: a standard (but not strictly necessary) style is to wrap it up with: [10:48:29] (function ($, mw, undefined) { /* all the script */ })(jQuery, mediaWiki); [10:51:55] whym: yes, thanks; I've already linked wayback from [[m:Wikimedia servers]]; an interwiki redirect to a section on server roles may also be appropriate [10:51:55] OK. [10:52:54] What people are behind https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Winter ? Who leads the project? [10:55:27] svetlana: jorm I think [10:57:10] * Nemo_bis thought Ded Moroz [10:59:20] legoktm: OK. [12:43:44] svetlana: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Engineering#Identifying_when_it.27s_too_late [12:51:47] good question [13:01:55] http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/admintools/2014-August/000000.html [13:03:03] Nemo_bis: I think the email notification is one-way. you still have to reply on-wiki. which is something you don't have to do with mailing lists. [13:03:40] and yes, mailing lists would soon be gone in favor of Flow, I expect. I did request this at least, some few months ago. :| [13:04:18] no comment [13:05:38] Nemo_bis: I must have made you sad. :( you usually have an opinion on things. [13:13:44] svetlana: not sad until this last line, which is quite hard on me [13:14:11] not sad until the last 50%. aww. [13:14:27] I'd prefer to say I usually can offer points of view