[00:54:23] * Jasper_Deng wonders if Reedy could investigate https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/44921 [00:54:35] the translate extension seems to be making its delete actions as logged out [00:54:39] but logging them as FuzzyBot [00:54:42] I'm going to bed :P [00:54:54] well, TimStarling is next in line ^ [01:10:59] interesting [01:11:35] you think it's just an AbuseFilter bug? [01:12:04] * Jasper_Deng thinks it's the translate extension [01:12:17] or maybe abuse filter shouldn't be checking automated actions like that [02:30:37] it uses the job queue, probably loses some context [06:08:15] Given https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Engineering/2014-15_Goals#Top_departmental_priorities_for_Q1_.28July_-_September_2014.29 I wonder what will happen to the Wikipedia holidays [06:08:51] We already have a Tim day for the new preprocessor, the only option would be to make it a Tim week. [06:09:16] everyone knows in their heart that every day is a Tim day [06:09:30] But then we'll look like ancient romans with their 200 days of holidays per year, which is not the image we like of our decline [06:09:39] True that as well [06:30:46] Hi. how will I check whether a hook ran successfully ? like when I gave $res = hook(), the $res seems to be always 1 -- regardless, whether the hook ran or not [06:37:41] tonythomas: I'm not sure I understand the question, what do you mean by "ran"? Maybe you care about whether a function managed to attach to the hook? Or if the function itself run successfully? [06:45:32] Nemo_bis: like I have this hook call in https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/138655/25/includes/UserMailer.php line 244 [06:46:17] I wanted to know whether the extension call was successful, or not -- so that I can set the configurations as below [06:47:32] I thought in $res = wfRunHooks( 'UserMailerChangeReturnPath', array( $to, &$returnPath ) ); $res backs to 0, when the extension was not found -- or the hook was not run -- but it seems like $res always gets to be 1 [06:50:14] Nemo_bis: and exactly -- 'whether a function managed to attach to the hook' :) [06:51:32] Add a debugging line at the beginning of that function? [07:06:54] Nemo_bis: actually, I want to do something like this. if ( hook_ran ) { .... } else { ... } that is possible with the debugging function ? [08:10:03] We have a cityspanning wifi provider that wants to give free access to all Wikimedia sites. Is there a list of IP-addresses somewhere I can hand to them? [08:10:32] hey Ainali [08:11:07] Hi, YuviPanda [08:11:44] Ainali: can you email wikipediazero@wikimedia.org (and maybe cc yuvipanda@wikimedia.org so I can poke people?) they are the ones who handle most of these things [08:11:53] Ainali: and should be able to hook you up quickly [08:12:17] Awesome, thanks! [08:12:35] Ainali: yw! [16:01:38] archive.org tripling bandwidth [16:01:40] 09.41 <@SketchCow> The work is to put a pair of multiplexers in the path from SF to Palo [16:01:43] 09.41 <@SketchCow> Alto, allowing multiple wavelengths of light. This is the same [16:01:46] 09.41 <@SketchCow> technology we are using between 300 Funston and 200 Paul. It will [16:01:49] 09.41 <@SketchCow> increase ISC's bandwidth on this link from 10 to 80 Gbps and our slice [16:01:52] 09.41 <@SketchCow> of that will increase from 9 to 30 Gbps. [16:10:53] nice [16:59:16] is there a magic word for CirrusSearch that allows me to search just in a chosen namespace? [16:59:25] e.g. innamespace:blah [17:00:33] prefix: ? :p [17:02:00] so I can do prefix:Template ? [17:04:14] manybubbles: ^^ [17:04:35] twkozlowski: namespace: - but cirrus is busted right now [17:04:45] we're trying to either fix it or disable the betafeature until we unbust it [17:04:55] #sad [17:05:04] we've unprimaried it on everything [17:08:15] unbroked [19:25:44] thaaaaaaaaaaanks akoopal https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60871 [21:19:38] Can you suppress a CheckUser log? [21:21:49] Hm, ^^ should be perhaps aimed at #mediawiki and not here. [21:30:03] twkozlowski, hmm... I assume you can - that sounds bad. [21:31:26] Not very much unless my other assumption comes true. [21:32:46] Would I need the checkuser-log right to view suppressed checkuser logs? [21:33:53] Not sure which takes the precedence here; either would be fine; combination would be tragic. [21:34:04] twkozlowski, Well, for example Wikimedia wikis don't allow there to be only one local checkuser - either 0 or 2+. If a checkuser and can also suppress stuff, it would defeat the point of this policy [21:34:55] It would if you'd need the checkuser-log /and/ the suppressionlog user rights [21:35:16] If you'd only need one of those, there's still at least one other person to control you [21:35:54] (Assuming you have 2 x CU + 2 x OS on the wiki) [21:36:07] twkozlowski, actually I just checked and it seems that CU has it's own logging system... [21:39:33] Krenair: okay, thanks :-)