[00:27:22] I have a bug: on an article a certain template is not inserted, but in the WhatLinksHere of the template it shows that it is inserted [00:44:57] Romaine, link to example? [00:45:13] https://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Speciaal:VerwijzingenNaarHier/Sjabloon:Co%C3%B6rdinaten&limit=500 [00:45:31] the two at the bottom [00:45:38] I say it wronbg [00:46:38] these 2: https://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Speciaal:VerwijzingenNaarHier/Sjabloon:Co%C3%B6rdinaten&limit=2&from=1397049&back=814745 [00:46:47] on both pages, this template is not inserted [00:47:18] (and it is not inserted into another template) [00:50:28] ow, one of them I know the cause [00:51:06] 1 solved, 1 not [00:51:28] 2 solved [00:51:44] ;) [00:51:46] bot situations users had added the coords template to a redirect [00:51:52] sorry for disturbing [00:52:07] just needed action=purge i think. (I ran that on both) [00:52:18] no [00:52:23] I purged all day [00:52:30] ah, ok. [00:52:53] the template was added to the redirect page, instead of the article which it pointed to [00:53:15] so clicking on the link in the WhatLinksHere list let you go to the article [00:53:40] but thanks for listening, solved [00:53:41] :) [00:55:00] /nick rubber_duck [00:55:28] ;) http://hwrnmnbsol.livejournal.com/148664.html and http://blog.codinghorror.com/rubber-duck-problem-solving/ and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubber_duck_debugging [00:58:40] quiddity: thanks for being the duck :p [01:58:58] hello [01:59:53] according to lastpass the ssl cert is not updated [02:12:31] what? [02:13:25] Krenair: i mean the ssl cert of wikimedia [02:13:43] cortexA9, what cert do you see? [02:14:04] SSL Certificate: Possibly Unsafe (created 1 year ago at Oct 22 00:00:00 2012 GMT) [02:15:01] so the change of your password is useless [02:15:19] cortexA9, probably lastpass is stupid and calls the "not valid before" date "issued on" [02:15:40] idk [02:15:49] google is safe right now [02:15:57] according to lastpass [02:16:01] When the certificate was changed it kept the previous "not valid before" date [02:16:38] you should read https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/04/10/wikimedias-response-to-the-heartbleed-security-vulnerability/ [02:17:14] yes i read Krenair [02:17:49] Krenair: maybe it takes some time [02:17:54] to update [02:17:57] cortexA9, what? [02:18:04] the cert [02:18:07] are you saying the certificate change hasn't taken place? [02:18:21] yes i think [02:18:33] cortexA9, what cert do you see? [02:18:38] this [02:18:52] wait [02:19:47] https://lastpass.com/heartbleed/?h=en.wikipedia.org [02:19:51] example [02:19:58] Krenair [02:24:54] cortexA9, lastpass is aware that people can reissue certs without changing dates [02:25:00] it says that at the bottom [02:25:22] Krenair: oh ok [02:25:33] Krenair: so it's all ok [02:25:51] but anyway, "Why hasn�t the �not valid before� date on your SSL certificate changed if you have already replaced it?" "Our SSL certificate provider keeps the original �not valid before� date (sometimes incorrectly referred to as an �issued on� date) in any replaced certificates. This is not an uncommon practice. Aside from looking at the change to the .pem files linked above in the Timeline, the other way of verifying that the re [02:25:51] placement took place is to compare the fingerprint of our new certificate with our previous one." in the wikimedia blow means that you should completely ignore any checks against the date, they're pointless [02:26:15] wikimedia blog* - I need some sleep [02:27:14] ok no problem Krenair [02:27:22] :) [02:28:23] This server is not vulnerable to the Heartbleed attack. (Experimental) [02:28:28] Krenair [02:28:36] https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=en.wikipedia.org [02:28:46] seems all ok :) [02:44:30] cortexA9, I sent an email to the provided address, tracked in OTRS as 2014041310001119. Hopefully they'll clean this up [02:52:57] Hey all. I have a 186 megabyte video I'd like to upload, and that's almost twice as large as the limit. Is there a workaround? [02:55:59] legoktm: you have any ideas? [02:56:21] (removed OTRS message, it's not down) [02:56:56] Sven_Manguard: file a bug in bugzilla under site requests and provide a direct link to the file you wish to upload (you can put it in dropbox or something), and then reedy will get around to it [02:57:08] Sven_Manguard: also provide username to upload under and the description of the file [02:57:21] Alright. [03:00:33] Sven_Manguard: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Maximum_file_size and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Server-side_upload [03:02:35] !largeuploads is https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Server-side_upload [03:02:36] Unable to modify db, access denied, link to database isn't valid [03:02:37] * Sven_Manguard is downloading Dropbox [03:02:55] !largeuploads [03:02:59] sigh. [03:03:00] w/e [03:03:05] !sigh [03:03:10] what did I do? [03:03:30] guess someone needs to poke petan [03:03:39] only channel he's in right now is #huggle [03:04:57] Sven_Manguard, see http://www.drop-dropbox.com/ (I'm not sure what the viable alternatives are though.) [03:11:59] http://www.heartbleedstatus.com/top-list.php [03:12:03] according to this [03:12:15] wikipedia is safe [03:12:32] and cert is changed [03:13:54] quiddity: box.com - they have more free storage space, but I've had problems with their desktop sync program [03:15:22] cortexA9, yes, this site checks a public key noted very quickly after heartbleed was announced against a newer one to tell whether it changed [03:15:37] rather than checking the "not valid until" date [03:30:14] petan is at #wm-bot too :p [06:32:48] getting logged out every time I put my computer to sleep, didn't happen before [06:32:53] intentional? [06:33:30] definitely related to the heartbleed response resetting sessions [06:34:39] Withoutaname: it was a netsplit [06:34:44] probably not related to heartbleed [06:34:47] maybe related to a ddos [06:34:53] no I meant onwiki [06:35:01] oh idk [06:35:06] im aware of the recent netsplit and have asked #freenode about it [06:42:07] there was some issues like that earlier, no idea how far cstreippe got with those [06:55:42] p858snake|l: bug report? [06:55:56] no idea? [06:57:39] apparently power failure [06:57:52] http://status.linode.com/2014/04/newark-connectivity-issues.html [07:19:29] Is there any way to place a picture in the middle of a paragraph? [07:20:01] It worked a few MW versions ago bot now any thumb creates a new paragraph [07:20:09] bugzilla? [11:15:17] hello [11:15:26] i read this article about ssl cert [11:15:34] http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2014/04/11/heartbleed-certificate-revocation-tsunami-yet-to-arrive.html [11:16:16] If your private key has been stolen, just reissuing the certificate is not enough to mitigate the risks posed by the Heartbleed bug [11:17:20] Even if you revoke your certificate, you may still be vulnerable to impersonation [11:18:10] However, even if all of the affected certificates were to be revoked, contemporary web browser software handles certificate revocation poorly [11:21:20] that is correct [11:22:21] cortexA9: I don't have the old certificate lying around, but I expect the certificates have been revoked [11:23:19] but, as you mentioned, that's not going to help for a mitm attack [11:31:58] valhallasw: you going to zurich btw ? [11:36:15] thedj: not this year [11:47:39] ^d: oi! [11:48:02] ^d: Just wanted to say that the inclusion of Wikidata in search results on other wikis is FUCKING AMAZING [11:48:05] thanks so much! [11:48:51] MatmaRex: or now that I think of it, wasn't it someone on pl.wiki who did that? :-P [11:53:47] mmmk [12:01:44] twkozlowski: i think that's a gadget, running on a few wikis [12:02:03] Well, it's awesomely cool anyway. [12:05:51] iirc that gadget killed labs at some point ;-) [12:06:27] Bad Labs. [12:23:42] twkozlowski: no, it was a problem with the gadget [12:28:20] Yeah, it was loaded at every request instead of just in search results [12:28:26] thereby effectively DDOS'ing labs [12:39:24] https://zmap.io/heartbleed/certificates.html [12:48:34] Weird site; BBC isn't highlighted even though their certificates are from 2013 [12:51:03] mmm really twkozlowski [12:51:15] strange [12:51:52] Well, they also say that some of the sites might not have been affected, so there's that, too. [14:14:55] twkozlowski: Example of search results including Wikidata? Sounds neat. [14:16:12] It does. [14:18:48] https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specjalna:Szukaj/Heartbleed Gloria [14:19:50] Hmm, neat. [14:20:29] The Poles don't have a "Heartbleed" redirect? [14:23:44] If you use google chrome. http://blog.cloudflare.com/certificate-revocation-and-heartbleed [14:25:06] You need to turn on "check certificate revocation" [14:26:23] Gloria: Apparently they don't; even the OpenSSL article does not mention it. [14:27:45] Hrm. [15:27:47] Hello, [15:27:56] anybody, would please let me know! [15:28:15] what changes brought me these annoying thing, [15:28:22] it is after every wikilink, [15:28:22] Can not get definition for this term. Some articles do not have appropriate structure. [15:28:26] "Can not get definition for this term. Some articles do not have appropriate structure." [15:29:03] a question mark" and when one hovers over that question mark, the pop-up message says, "Can not get definition for this term. Some articles do not have appropriate structure." [15:29:03] I didn't change anything recently! [15:29:13] no preferences change! [15:29:42] It is an uninvited annoying stuff! [15:29:59] It looks weird, a small question mark after every wikilink! [17:17:44] question mark? as in UseModWiki? [18:45:01] Someone free to answer me? [18:45:36] What is this new appearing weird on Wikipedia, [18:45:40] Can not get definition for this term. Some articles do not have appropriate structure [18:45:46] 19.17 < Nemo_bis> question mark? as in UseModWiki? [18:45:53] A little question mark after every wiki link, [18:46:05] Yes, [18:46:08] how to remove that? [18:46:18] It says, "Can not get definition for this term. Some articles do not have appropriate structure" [18:46:36] It doesn't appear on Safari but on Google Chrome, [18:46:56] There is no such string in MediaWiki. https://translatewiki.net/w/i.php?title=Special%3ASearchTranslations&query=Can+not+get+definition+for+this+term.+Some+articles+do+not+have+appropriate+structure [18:47:14] Hence it's a gadget or other javascript you or an admin have activated on the wiki in question [18:47:50] I didn't make any change to preferences, [18:48:10] It is appearing only since couple of hours, [18:48:14] still doesnt on safari, [18:48:26] but on my regular browser, chrome, [18:48:51] btw it's fine if you use one line per sentence [18:48:51] I would give a link to screenshot, [18:49:13] It is weird, [18:50:40] http://s11.postimg.org/rdmfja1qr/Capture.png [18:50:47] click the link, [18:50:59] a screenshot, to my new weird UI [18:51:21] There's a little question mark appearing after each wikilink [18:51:32] sigh [18:52:07] when you click, mark/unmark, it edits that respective blue link, page! [18:52:35] It is only since few hours, [18:52:48] nothing did I really change in between, [18:53:40] lol, skin [18:56:09] It is fine, on Firefox too. [18:56:20] Only G-chrome, showing that, [19:06:17] Anup_, I would check your list of chrome extensions [19:08:32] screenshot coming! [19:09:32] link-1, http://postimg.org/image/cuow5ikap/ [19:09:59] link-2, http://postimg.org/image/n618y6c01/ [19:10:14] last-one, http://postimg.org/image/k0gn7ytdt/ [19:25:40] Argh, no solution! [20:06:42] anup_ (grr, he's quit again.) "In version 2.15 - new setting - hide question marks." in the Wikipedia Quick Hints extension [20:08:39] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Anup :) [20:15:25] ta :)