[00:05:15] CCing here, greg-g appears to be out of commission for a few hours, but is scheduled as the responsible party for the LD, should I ignore common sense and go anyway? [00:12:32] Never mind [00:12:36] Went forward [00:14:14] [[Tech]]; Verdy p; [none]; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=7563689&oldid=7562154&rcid=5014711 [02:07:24] hi, im wondering if its possible to do any sort of globbing on titles in API revision queries? [02:07:44] our wiki is usually namespaced [02:08:16] so i want to query for &titles=Foo/* [02:08:54] any pointers on if this is possible? Im not seeing anything in the API help output [02:11:01] hmm, perhaps i can use titles=Category:Foo|Category:Bar ... means i need ot rely on proper categorisation of all the pages though [02:12:19] htaccess: nope, no globbing is possible [02:12:42] htaccess: you can use the [[Special:prefixIndex]] page or its API equivalent to list pages in a format like that, thought [02:13:24] MatmaRex: ok so then i need to formulate a query that returns a list of pages that i can then query individually [02:13:25] (the API version would be action=query&list=allpages&apfrom=…, https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Allpages) [02:13:36] you can also use that as a generator [02:13:44] that is, instead of the titles= parameter, all in one request [02:13:59] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Generator#Generators [02:14:11] * htaccess reads [02:14:19] heh, this actually has an example of exactly what you're looking for [02:14:58] yea looks promising [02:15:01] * htaccess tries [02:15:05] htaccess: also, this is very handy for creating complicated queries: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ApiSandbox [02:15:16] (you can install the extension on your own wiki) [02:15:17] thanks [02:24:30] MatmaRex: thanks, that generator stuff pretty much does what I needed [02:24:55] although i cant use rvlimit=5 when doing generators unfortunately [02:25:01] but thats not a show stopper [05:53:45] rdwrer: impressive sense of common sense. yes, sorry, I forgot to tell you I was going to be out and that you were ok to go [08:54:25] Nemo_bis: uh ? where ? [09:37:17] Fun http://imgur.com/lGyGPRG [09:37:24] thedj: the urdu font bug [09:41:51] the problem with filing bug reports is that you can't get yourself removed from the ticket anymore... [09:49:26] thedj: set "Automatically add me to the CC list of bugs I change" to "Always", and untick all the 'reporter' ticks at https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ? [09:53:08] valhallasw: no [09:53:21] thedj: there is a feature for that in 5.0 IIRC [09:53:57] that is, a checkbox "ignore this bug report" [09:54:52] Nemo_bis: what 'no'? [09:55:08] 5.0 is not exactly close to being deployed on the WMF bugzilla [09:55:24] hence sadness [09:56:48] So in the meanwhile, the explicit CC trick should work. [10:04:44] valhallasw: i'm not gonna update the hundreds of bugs i filed to make that work, just for this one bug [10:07:12] not to mention that someone can always rudely re-add you to cc [10:14:34] thedj: *shrug* then tell your e-mail client to ignore it :p [10:23:12] "rudely re-add you" :D [10:24:09] @rudely re-adding: sure, but at that point the technical problem became a social one [10:30:57] Not really. The whole point of an ignore feature is having a technical workaround to avoid being bothered by a social issue. [14:20:13] <77CABJORR> hashar: Hi! Could you check that https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/114463/ makes jshint pass and if so, make jshint voting for ProofreadPage, please? [14:21:29] hashar: Sorry, the last ping was from me. [14:30:51] that is fast :-] [14:31:40] Tpt: I have amended the commit message to point to bug 61619 [14:31:48] hashar: Thanks [14:32:19] Tpt: that makes jshint happy, you will have to verify the change is not breaking something though :-] [14:32:49] whenever it get merged, you can close https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61619 and we can make the jslint job to be voting (i.e. block the change with verified -1 whenever jshint fails) [14:33:13] hashar: I've made only cosmetically changes and tested them locally. [14:33:20] \O/ [14:33:23] So I think I can merge now [14:34:27] <36DACKJY5> hashar: It's merged [14:35:42] will make Zuul to vote :-] [14:35:50] <36DACKJY5> Thanks :-) [14:37:26] done! [14:37:28] congratulations [14:39:29] <36DACKJY5> Thanks :-) [17:47:35] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Tpt [17:47:39] [7e522347] 2014-02-20 17:47:15: Fatal exception of type MWException [17:48:52] 2014-02-20 17:47:15 mw1073 mediawikiwiki: [7e522347] /wiki/User_talk:Tpt Exception from line 468 of /usr/local/apache/common-local/php-1.23wmf15/includes/cache/LocalisationCache.php: No localisation cache found for English. Please run maintenance/rebuildLocalisationCache.php. [17:48:59] sigh [17:49:28] Interesting error when it's not finished copying the files [17:49:34] Never mind rebuilding hte cdbs from json [17:51:21] reedy@fluorine:/a/mw-log$ grep "No localisation" exception.log -c [17:51:21] 2523 [17:51:22] Ouch [17:56:11] it's spreading on more pages for me [17:57:28] still scapping away [18:20:59] and still [18:27:30] Nemo_bis: Because scap is still running [21:12:11] well, mostly over at last https://ganglia.wikimedia.org/latest/graph.php?r=day&z=xlarge&title=MediaWiki+errors&vl=errors+%2F+sec&x=5.5&n=&hreg[]=vanadium.eqiad.wmnet&mreg[]=fatal|exception>ype=stack&glegend=show&aggregate=1&embed=1 [21:12:53] 2 hours? [21:14:00] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/25/Rope_shovel.gif/180px-Rope_shovel.gif [21:14:26] Are there logs available for this sort of error? [21:15:02] thumbnail.log? [21:16:10] "There have been too many recent failed attempts (5 or more) to render this thumbnail. Please try again later." hmph [21:16:13] I've never seen anyone actively using that log though (which is sad, a lot of stuff could be fixed) [21:18:25] That gif is addictive [21:18:53] It's an awful file [21:19:30] Rope_shovel.gif or the thumbnail error log? [21:22:15] Nemo_bis, there's more gifs like this btw: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AListFiles&limit=500&user=Pasimi&ilshowall=1 [21:23:31] He should probably fix his software then :P [21:25:56] Oh well, whatever [21:26:04] McMusatz to the rescue [21:58:29] manybubbles: is there a comparison of the space taken by the old lucene index and ES'? [22:05:46] Nemo_bis: in my head, yeah. ES takes up more space but it has excuses. I'm working on something upstream that'll let us save a good deal of space. [22:25:17] odder: were wikimedia-l archives restored? [22:32:06] rdwrer: remind me again what is needed to be done to enable a BF? is it just a config change ala enabling an extension? [22:35:12] Nemo_bis: restored? [22:35:52] odder: to their pristine state [22:37:08] I don't know what you mean [22:56:07] hi [22:56:24] are you sure we are Up, I can load pages of wmf [22:57:08] You've just contradicted yourself [22:57:10] you can so we're up... [22:57:14] FB works, Google works, but wm projects doenst work [22:57:20] connection time out [22:57:30] Where in the world are you? [22:58:07] ha, now we are coming [22:58:16] Reedy: central Europe [22:58:20] Reedy: IP says Czech Republic [22:58:35] Pastebin a trace router to en.wikipedia.org ? [22:58:35] but now after minutes it start to look ok [22:59:17] increadible, person just come to the devs channel and suddenly it works [22:59:20] thank you! [22:59:36] magic. [23:01:00] The NSA were listening in [23:07:30] James_F: hola [23:08:22] odder: Hey? [23:08:55] James_F: we'll be finishing Tech News #9 tomorrow morning, I expect 7 AM [23:09:10] Can you add VE stuff there? [23:09:16] I see some exciting new features [23:09:46] odder: Oh, sure, will add now. [23:17:32] odder: {{done}} [23:17:39] odder: Feel free to edit mercilessly. :-) [23:19:21] I will; for instance, we featured redirects last week :-) [23:36:07] 17:32 < greg-g> rdwrer: remind me again what is needed to be done to enable a BF? is it just a config change ala enabling an extension? [23:38:11] greg-g: It should be, as long as the extension code is there [23:38:16] And like [23:38:17] Not buggy [23:38:30] right, so, the next question is: who's doing that for the hovercard one [23:38:57] * rdwrer lols [23:39:13] greg-g: Well zz_prtksxna is the dev on the project [23:39:32] greg-g: Apart from that I have noooo clue [23:39:50] k [23:39:54] I'll ask Jared tomorrow [23:40:04] Did he put it into [[Deployments]]? [23:40:09] If so I can just go ask him now [23:40:18] Or we can [23:40:25] if you can, sure, i think I did, on his statement of the plan [23:40:52] I think I did (at it to [[Deployments]]* [23:41:01] gah [23:41:03] add it to [23:41:06] Ah [23:41:09] * greg-g looks for his fingers [23:41:26] greg-g: Was it just that someone told you it was going out? That person should really know who's deploying it. [23:41:39] yeah, think it was Jared [23:41:45] OK, I will ask. [23:42:23] Oh, I forgot you were in the office. [23:42:30] And didn't know you were on this side besides [23:42:35] I'm over in 'your seat' [23:42:51] He's offsite and then will be commuting [23:42:54] So I guess...email [23:43:55] yeah, or tomorrow during deploy updates meeting [23:44:02] Oh, smart. [23:44:06] Does he go to that? [23:44:06] no major rush, as long as there is an answer :) [23:44:08] yeah [23:45:13] I definitely think prtksxna is too new to have shell on tin, but I may be wrong [23:45:44] Maybe someone from mobile offered to help out or something [23:45:47] odder: That's why I suggested not featuring them last week. :-P [23:46:29] rdwrer: /me nods [23:46:39] James_F: I see what you mean [23:47:52] odder: Oh well.