[00:33:05] can i add gadgets at test.wikipedia.org? i'm writing one but get permission errros at my wiki instance when trying to save to a wikiemdia wiki [00:48:07] Sveta: Presumably you'd need local administrator [00:52:53] i could do it as a user script [00:52:59] but i don't know how to load css [01:03:34] Reedy: https://test.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page "New software, extensions and gadgets can be deployed immediately to the deployment cluster." -- which one is tat about? http://deployment.wikimedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Main_Page ? [01:04:55] Yeah. I'm not sure deployment wiki is actually used for anything [01:12:01] anyone here use Bitcoins? [01:12:12] lol [01:12:19] That's somewhat offtopic.. [01:12:56] yeah [01:13:03] but I need 0.001 to get my faucet running :p [03:16:07] interesting ntsamr spam: "My hobby is mainly Dog sport. Seems boring? Not!
I to learn Norwegian in my spare time.

Also visit my web page :: [http://www.example.com/ google plus account login]" [03:16:13] the link really went to example.com [04:54:22] what's the little image called that's shown in the left of the url bar? [04:56:43] oh favicon [07:30:00] What, gerrit 2.8 has full text search? http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/issues/detail?id=866 [10:16:43] Uh " Week of Feb 24: Typograph Refresh merged in to Vector for all users (not inluding width or blockquote changes) " https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Deployments [10:38:38] oh no, I hate Typography Refresh [10:38:56] give them feedback [10:39:07] it's a bit narrow and people suggested how to make use of the white space [10:39:23] they're not rolling out each nightly to the wikis but I think they're still working on it :) [10:39:24] people have given feedback [10:39:35] I don't like the greyishness of it all [10:40:09] I tend to give more feedback, even if repetitive, for them go get the point across [10:41:00] http://tools.wikimedia.pl/~odder/screenshots/BetaFeatures.png [10:41:05] can't even enable it, so meh [10:41:34] which channel do they sit in? err... I dunno actually what team is working on it, sorry [10:43:54] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ac/Typography_refresh_beta_feature_2013-11-22_13-35.png [10:44:05] if anyone is planning to enable this, there will be riots [10:47:00] twkozlowski: I think it's all a conspiracy to get everyone to use monobook [10:47:48] Or perhaps a subtle strategy to make people register in mass (for the ability to use monobook) [10:48:26] Nemo_bis is the only damage (visible to the naked eye) is the silly title font? [10:53:25] Nemo_bis: I dunno; it was only supposed to be an experiment [10:54:35] oh, I enabled it on en. [10:54:40] * twkozlowski cries [10:55:12] or maybe, I should say, /me cries, groans, and wails [10:55:15] my eyes...!!!! [10:55:42] why the hell are people trying to kill my eyes with more and more grey when I tell them not to...! [10:56:34] hah, now I can't disable it. Yay. [11:04:28] twkozlowski: BetaFeatures are not meant to be experiments, they're meant to be an accelerated way to deliver changes [11:05:27] Not what it says on the tin... [11:05:38] tin? [11:05:39] https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56537 [11:06:54] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Typography_refresh [11:07:00] If you are interested in further technical information on the rationale behind this experiment, you can read more at Wikimedia Foundation Design/Typography. [11:09:30] orly [11:58:48] Nemo_bis: Hi! about https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/113064/ do you think I should merge the two changes now? [12:01:32] Tpt_: Hello! I like the feature but I was mainly welcoming the new contributor, I didn't check the regex. [12:01:44] I surely was often annoyed by that overwriting [12:03:41] Nemo_bis: The change is fine. The question was "should I merge it now or wait she amends the first change as requested in https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/112806/" Sorry for the misunderstanding. [12:06:13] Tpt_: I'd say merge both at the same time, doesn't seem worth making the author fight with git more [12:06:24] ok. Thanks [12:11:42] I've just merged the two changes and fixed a minor error in the second one [12:11:45] Thanks :-) [20:12:59] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Tech News 08/2014 has been published [20:13:01] !technews [20:13:18] (that's unhelpful.) [20:13:33] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tech/News/2014/08 [20:15:24] twkozlowski, hmm... [20:15:47] Not quite sure how [9] and [10] are related to the suggested linking of a disambig/redirect page [20:24:17] blame James_F|Away [21:49:16] hey [21:49:25] SUL is automatically implemented for new accounts, yes? [21:49:37] someone who's now logged into enwiki should also be logged in to commons, yes? [21:50:21] Not sure if it works after registering, or they neeed to login again... [21:53:22] Dragonfly6-7: you need to visit the site once [21:53:36] I'm trying to lead a new user through it [21:53:51] It also depends on whether another local account with that name already existed somewhere [21:56:11] Nemo_bis - any way I can check on whether that's the case? [21:58:39] Special:CentralAuth [21:58:54] Or he can just visit Special:Preferences [21:59:16] uh? [22:34:47] incidentally, the 'problem with SUL' that I asked about -- just a misunderstanding. Thanks anyway. [22:57:41] Happens often