[07:53:57] Gloria: https://code.google.com/p/gerrit/issues/list [08:00:43] Don't make me. :-( [08:00:48] Sleeeeeep. [08:05:07] * Nemo_bis takes whip and glares at Gloria [08:05:50] We need more stars anyway, if you want it to be fixed. :P [09:40:38] hi, has there been any deployment/change regarding Special:Block? on svwp the tab-index on that page has changed. [11:29:49] fluff: changed how? [11:30:02] last change was several months ago AFAIK [11:39:08] (Also asked at #mediawiki; if they share something I will share here.) Hi all. How do I put a text variable into edit box, instead of template contents (which is what preload does). [12:42:52] andre__: should the upstream reports linked in http://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/new-gerrit-change-view-comments be tracked in some bugzilla report? [13:14:05] Hi, i keep getting parse errors on

tags with \begin{align}
[13:14:26] example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine#Identities
[13:15:15] it says Failed to parse(unknown function '\begin'): {\begin{aligned}\sin \theta &=\cos \left({\frac {\pi }{2}}-\theta \right)\\&={\frac {1}{\csc \theta }}\end{aligned}}
[13:16:26] which is weird, because in page source it's \begin{align}, without -ed
[13:16:40] anyone knows what's going on?
[13:18:04] zyla: there were big changes lately, report a bug please
[13:18:27] Nemo_bis: ok, thanks
[13:48:54] Nemo_bis, would that be helpful for anybody? I don't see a need for copying random upstream tickets if it does not help anybody.
[13:49:27] I don't know or I wouldn't ask :)
[14:08:00] Nemo_bis: do you know how to protect a translationsubpage?
[14:08:50] You do not have permission to change protection levels for this page, for the following reasons:
[14:08:51] This page cannot be updated manually. This page is a translation of the page Template:Personality rights/i18n and the translation can be updated using the translation tool.
[14:12:58] Steinsplitter: have you checked the manual? :)
[14:13:08] You need to use priority languages
[14:15:25] complex tool :O
[14:15:27] thx :)
[14:52:53] Nemo_bis: if the "length" select-box is selected and I press [tab] I end up in the find-box (top right) not in the "reason" select-box
[14:53:46] any issues with TeX integration known about ? Got some errors at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chebyshev_polynomials#Definition
[14:54:56] fluff: with Vector, I assume?
[14:55:01] Nemo_bis: yes
[14:55:41] NotASpy: yes, several issues even, cache involved though so you may need action=purge? check bugzilla and report
[14:55:52] Nemo_bis: html-wise I see that there's tab-index attribute on the target and length boxes, but not on the rest of that form
[14:56:17] will do Nemo_bis 
[14:56:28] fluff: uh, right, nasty
[15:01:50] there is only tabindex 1 and 2, can't remember if it was like that before too
[15:02:02] the page doesn't want to purge (for me, anyway). 
[15:03:15] Nemo_bis: me neither
[15:08:52] OK, page purged eventually, took about 10 minutes and it's made no difference. I'll do a bug report (or check and add to an existing one) later. 
[15:09:37] NotASpy, there are numerous errors listed under https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60997
[15:09:45] see list of dependencies
[18:12:41] Hello. I've been seeing latex rendering issues on a lot of Wikipedia pages. Is this a known issue?
[18:12:57] e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergeometric_function#Special_cases
[18:13:19] brainsturgeon: how long has this been the case? longer than 24 hours?
[18:14:10] yes.
[18:14:14] since yesterday
[18:14:34] at least since yesterday at 12 noon.
[18:15:25] Sounds like a known issue, then
[18:15:34] Math had problems during yesterday's deploy
[18:15:46] well, there were several major breaking changes introduced to the math extension that were deployed yesterday
[18:16:11] this doesn't sound like the same problem, but it might tip the scale toward reverting the extension to a known-good state
[18:16:12] What's the syntax change causing the failure? I can correct them as I see them.
[18:16:25] <^d>	 ori: Reverting it would be painful.
[18:16:26] i'm not sure
[18:16:29] <^d>	 It should be fine at this point.
[18:16:39] i'm not sure was re: syntax change
[18:17:05] <^d>	 There shouldn't be any syntax changes.
[18:17:57] <^d>	 And that error is *not related* to what we saw yesterday.
[18:18:20] <^d>	 (It may have gone out with those changes, but that single change we discussed yesterday isn't at fault)
[18:19:13] Other examples, cf. "Stirling's Approximation", "Binomial Distribution"
[18:19:29] <^d>	 ori: Reverting would cause mass cache invalidations again.
[18:19:39] <^d>	 If we rolled all the way back properly.
[18:19:49]^d: OK, so let's not
[18:19:53] Failures are all on "align" environments as far as I've seen.
[18:20:02] <^d>	 Yeah, seems like it.
[18:21:05] Possibly *every* align environment. I've yet to find one rendered properly.
[18:23:16] <^d>	 It's still in the list of acceptable commands, syntax shouldn't have changed.
[18:24:28] <^d>	 Bleh, I wish I knew more about texvc.
[18:25:31]^d: found the fix.
[18:25:43] replace with [18:26:00] <^d>	 Hmm.
[18:32:46] *found *a* fix. probably some way to use \ensuremath to programatically fix every page.
[18:41:12] ...
[18:41:16]