[00:19:32] ^d: you could just keep RoanKattouw restrained to his desk [00:19:45] or some sort of collar w/ bell if he works in the office [00:20:40] <^d> Indeed. [00:20:44] <^d> RoanKattouw: How about this one? https://lh3.ggpht.com/-XiEpfwLNVsc/T06Ac4eILDI/AAAAAAAAAVs/_USrp0LBOPg/s1600/cat_sitting_with_bell_collar.jpg [00:25:53] ^d: nah, I envisage RoanKattouw as a man of class and would at least want something hand sewen or custom made [00:29:21] Betacommand: Slight bug report that may or may not be your script's fault [00:29:29] well a bug from your script not its fault :p [00:29:48] For some reason I get an error on processing "2000 in music" 1 sec going back to find error [00:30:04] oh it didn't happen this time [00:39:57] Betacommand: Are you a guy? [00:40:05] because I'm referring to you and I wanna know to use he or she [14:28:21] yuvipanda: just to be clear, regarding the popups: this is not going to be publicly visible on the beta page or elsewhere until those bugs are fixed? [14:28:35] YairRand: hey! yeah, that is correct [14:28:47] ah, that's a relief [14:29:20] YairRand: the feature flag is disabled by default, and it will require an explicit deploy to turn it on [14:29:28] okay [14:29:30] YairRand: and I'll make sure you know before it [14:29:59] yuvipanda: thank you very much [14:30:06] YairRand: thank *you* very much :D [14:30:11] :) [14:30:19] YairRand: I think the design team is thinking of getting rid of the star for the first release, however. Am not sure [14:30:29] (prtksxna is the developer working on it, and I think he's afk now) [14:30:42] only for the first release? [14:30:44] paravoid: \o/ [14:30:47] err [14:30:48] sorry paravoid [14:30:50] I meant prtksxna [14:30:52] YairRand: Hello o/ [14:31:00] yuvipanda: \o [14:31:06] prtksxna: YairRand was asking about the watchlist star [14:31:48] YairRand: Right, so the 2 major things that I've changed are getting rid of the watchlist star and the read more link. Now the whole thing is clickable and is a link [14:32:07] YairRand: Got rid of the star otherwise it would be a clickable inside the clickable [14:32:16] hm... :/ [14:32:55] YairRand: The timestamp changed mostly because of https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/109878/1/js/popup.js [14:33:16] the timestamp will probably come back soon [14:33:33] YairRand: yuvipanda yup! once we do the localisation stuff [14:34:06] I actually did partly set things up to ease localizing at [[User:Yair rand/NavPopupsRestyled.js]]... [14:34:19] YairRand: This is stuff that the design team thought of, I have a meeting with them in in 2-3 hours, if you have any concerns I could put them forth when we talk [14:34:19] mw.messages.set and such [14:34:40] YairRand: yeah, it should be trivial, but I felt it would be nicer to get this merged first and then work on that. [14:34:50] YairRand: This is my first patch, so I am taking it a little slow :| [14:35:12] the change of the link from the read more to the whole box, was that a decision by the design team? [14:35:28] YairRand: ah, I also didn't see the mw.messages stuff, must be a recent addition [14:35:28] YairRand: Yes [14:36:31] * YairRand is slightly annoyed that the gerrit doesn't allow comments from either wiki accounts or anons... [14:37:03] YairRand: you should get an account! I know it's terrible, but better than nothing... [14:38:11] should I change the on-wiki version to match changes to the one on gerrit? [14:38:28] YairRand: Yes, I'll do that [14:38:31] YairRand: hmm, I don't know, tbh. [14:38:41] o [14:38:45] for you and prtksxna and the design team to figure out :) [14:41:37] YairRand: yuvipanda: I'll see what all has changed and discuss everything with the design team. Would that be fine? [14:41:52] yes [17:28:56] 14 [19:00:32] StevenW: I miss a [Thanks] button for mailing lists [19:00:49] Thanks for adding this http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/design/2014-January/001437.html to Tech News [19:00:53] StevenW: I miss a [Thanks] button for AFK [19:01:06] twkozlowski: no problem [19:02:21] I also see you added the bit about GettingStarted, this is appreciated as well :-) [19:02:57] only if other people would add their significant patches/changes too… [19:03:02] Is it possible to know what kind of thing is in the Job queue? [19:03:10] maybe using some query on labs? [20:11:21] hi [20:11:23] hi Betacommand you here? [20:11:37] Newyorkadam: yeah [20:11:48] Betacommand: what was the url error log you scanned? [20:12:27] Newyorkadam: information for a project Im on [20:12:39] Betacommand: Can I help? [20:13:09] Not yet, im in the data gathering/analysis phase still [20:13:21] k [20:18:31] StevenW: on a related note, are there any Gerrit patches we can link to for the buttons update? [20:18:41] if not, I can live with a link to -ambassadors [20:21:13] errm... /the/ link; I know you already posted there :) [20:49:05] andre__: DB support issues from extensions are also tracked like core ones on the core tracking bug? [20:49:19] se4598, is that a core tracking bug? [20:50:49] andre__: I don't understand your reply. I mean https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60639 for AbuseFilter, which is now tracked by SQLite support (tracking) at Product MediaWiki [20:51:54] se4598: I think I don't care if the tracking bug is under "MediaWiki" or "MW extensions". In the end it's a place that people can watch who are interested in SQlite or Postgres support [20:52:04] (either users or developers) [20:52:31] ok [20:53:02] we have way too many tracking bugs anyway, in my opinion :) [20:53:40] but I think Wikimedia is a community that loves categorizing stuff :P [20:55:01] andre__: Another thing: Yesterday I set the flag Backport_to_Stable to ?, https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Backporting_fixes says, that the release manager is automatically informed by mail. Is this still correct? [20:55:25] se4598, yes, correct :) Thanks for setting that! [21:12:06] twkozlowski: yes there is a string of them [21:12:27] But the main one is https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/103494/ [21:28:25] thanks StevenW; I added that link to #6 [21:28:43] (it will probably be re-written and simplified tomorrow, but the link will likely stay.) [21:37:53] https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&hideliu=1&hideanons=1 [21:37:57] now that's interesting [21:38:01] shouldn't the list be empty? [21:38:22] twkozlowski: no, it does magic [21:38:34] when you pass both of these options [21:38:39] sometimes it ignores one of them [21:38:43] and sometimes it shows bots only [21:39:10] i've had the dubious pleasure of deciphering that code [21:39:15] madness, i say. [21:39:35] but this isn't exactly what the outcome /should/ be, is it? [21:39:56] hideliu & hideanons = empty list for me :-) [21:40:36] you and whoever wrote that in 2006 or so clearly have different opinions on the matter [21:40:42] that entire interface sucks [21:41:28] let me find you the culprit [21:42:19] http://mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/13437 [21:42:28] # It makes no sense to hide both anons and logged-in users [21:42:32] # Where this occurs, force anons to be shown [21:42:39] that was later extended with some more magic [21:43:17] http://mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/32696 [21:44:35] Well, maybe it doesn't make sense, but to me it's a bit unexpected, tbh [21:44:54] but that's opinions n' stuff, so I'll stop right here :-)