[00:00:05] Can you look at the commit that added UseDualLicense? [00:00:11] ^d: they could highlight at you instead. But basically: because judges have said you should. [00:01:00] <^d> Silly judges. [00:01:07] * ^d teaches them how to turn off capslock [00:06:36] * Reedy runs svn blame [00:07:04] I'm not sure the footer ever listed both. [00:07:33] And the true/false seems backward to me. [00:08:29] That's hardly the major issue here [00:08:47] It seems relevant. [00:09:11] It's not what is wrong though [00:09:30] What's the betting this ends up attributed to domas' auto commit.. [00:10:35] 1 brion 'wmgUseDualLicense' => array( [00:10:35] 2145 reedy 'default' => false, [00:10:47] It's been there since SVN has been used for wiki config [00:12:38] r1 | brion | 2009-08-18 19:00:17 +0000 (Tue, 18 Aug 2009) | 1 line [00:12:38] Initial import of wmf-config to local SVN repo [00:12:55] Before SVN, I think there was another VCS used. [00:12:57] But I forget. [00:13:28] before SVN they made a new folder every months and copied everything in it [00:13:53] It doesn't matter [00:14:06] wmgUseDualLicense wasn't in CommonSettings.php in r1 [00:14:32] Quite interesting that there's largely unchanged blocks of code in here [00:15:43] Wouldn't new wikis have UseDualLicense = false? [00:15:54] Why [00:16:02] Because new wikis aren't dual-licensed. [00:16:12] I thought it was old wikis were GFDL + CC and new wikis are just CC. [00:16:14] // Add new wikis for dual-license here... [00:16:19] I know what the comment says. [00:16:22] I'm saying it seems backward. [00:16:59] https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Add_a_wiki&diff=47097&oldid=47096 [00:18:30] https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Add_a_wiki&diff=next&oldid=47127 [00:20:02] Text to which you hold the copyright: When you submit text to which you hold the copyright, you agree to license it under: [00:20:02] Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (“CC BY-SA”), and [00:20:02] GNU Free Documentation License (“GFDL”) (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). [00:23:49] From https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#7._Licensing_of_Content [00:33:56] :) [01:48:26] jdlrobson, kaldari: ping [01:48:38] hey [01:48:46] heya [01:48:52] you just missed Jon by 2 seconds [01:49:03] yeah ;( [01:49:04] he's about to split [05:09:31] My bug is rearrange the elements under the namespaces select box in alphabetic order. I found the php file which must be changed but I need some guidance on how to proceed. The file is core/core/includes/WatchedItem.php [06:33:22] I have to rename 'userrights' to 'usergroups' in special pages. Is the specials directory in includes in the core repo the right one? The bug is https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44205 [08:29:32] The bug I'm currently trying to work on is https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54749. Here if the f parameter is not specified, changes should be made everywhere. In which function must the changes be made? I'm a newbie to bug-fixing. [08:36:16] sob, grepping bzipped dumps is looong http://ganglia.wmflabs.org/latest/?r=week&cs=&ce=&m=load_one&s=by+name&c=dumps&h=&host_regex=&max_graphs=0&tab=m&vn=&sh=1&z=small&hc=4 [09:30:51] arav93, that bug is under "MediaWiki" so #mediawiki and #wikimedia-dev would be better channels (tech is more about infrastructure; I know this is confusing) [20:22:28] Hi folks [20:23:49] https://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=Page:Mrs_Beeton%27s_Book_of_Household_Management_%28Part_2%29.djvu/61&action=edit&redlink=1 does something odd [20:24:22] In that links to the wrong place [20:24:57] Can someone please confirm or llock down the Wikisource DB and stuff until it's been checked that there isn't something more serious going on? [20:25:37] https://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=Page:Mrs_Beeton%27s_Book_of_Household_Management_%28Part_2%29.djvu/61&action=edit&redlink=1 links [20:25:43] But the index has NO dot ... [20:25:45] Oh, that's a familiar book. [20:25:56] And The index won't link to the page etc... [20:26:00] Qcoder00: How is the link wrong? [20:26:16] twkozlowski: In that it loads the scan and text for the equivalent in Part 1 [20:26:21] (first link) [20:26:48] The index page for part 2 is here - https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Index:Mrs_Beeton%27s_Book_of_Household_Management_%28Part_2%29.djvu [20:27:12] Why the presence or not of a dot in the title is causing Mediawiki to have klitten... [20:27:18] *kittens [20:27:43] I don't understand [20:28:05] (The Second link which shouldn't technically have worked, got the correct scan and text..) [20:28:18] But it's ONLY that page which links badly [20:28:41] I'd like someone to lock down Wikisource [20:28:54] Until it's KNOWN why this is occuring [20:40:44] Reedy: ^^ [20:41:57] I'm not sure making hte db readonly is needed [20:42:07] yeah, seems overkill [20:42:35] At this point, there's 3 sets of changes [20:42:42] 1.22wmf9-1.22wmf10 [20:42:46] Addition of Wikidata [20:42:50] And any updates to ProofreadPage [20:42:56] Tpt: About? [20:46:11] Reedy: Some minor details + change in the diff output for Page: pages https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/97210/ [20:47:03] Tpt: What about it? [20:48:22] Reedy: Sorry, I believe there is a misunderstanding. I was just listing changes in ProofreadPage between wmf9 and wmf10 [20:49:30] The "diff output" change just improves the presentation of diff by outputting different diff areas for header, footer and body. So, nothing very stong. [20:49:40] Oh [20:49:52] Tpt: Sorry [20:49:58] You missed out on the prior conversation [20:50:03] let me pastebin [20:50:18] Tpt: http://p.defau.lt/?T8AgWXvF2yfgpNMtQe3Knw [20:50:25] Reedy: Thanks [21:00:05] Reedy: I believe it isn't a new bug (I don't see what recent change could introduce this bug) but I'll investigate more.