[06:57:39] Nice, in march we'll know how many hits we get from Firefox search bar https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758857 [08:14:29] aaaaaaaaaaaargh https://toolserver.org/~diberri/cgi-bin/html2wiki/ [11:38:28] hi [11:38:40] is there an example of a jquery based script which adds a new tab [11:50:37] New tAb gry? [11:51:46] You mean drop down tab in vector? [11:52:23] yes [11:52:26] If so, Twinkle or the link condenser [11:53:45] I'll give you some direct links to source that does it in about an hour. Outside waiting on a bus atm. [11:53:59] it's ok, i will find [11:54:04] i will be sleeping then [11:54:06] thanks :) [11:54:53] Maybe AzaToth can point you to the code in morebits they use. [11:55:13] Or amelthea if you can find them [12:05:56] /win 2 [12:12:03] ja.wikipedia.org's top page returns an error instead of the page content. [12:12:09] is this already known? [12:12:28] http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%A1%E3%82%A4%E3%83%B3%E3%83%9A%E3%83%BC%E3%82%B8 (error shown when logged out) [12:12:57] whym_away: someone vandalized main page titles on testwiki recently [12:13:07] idk whether that's related to this instance [12:15:49] can somone pleas delete this file: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58665 ? [12:17:06] copyright violation, waiting since 2013-12-18 for deletion [12:21:28] i followed example @ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:User_scripts/Guide, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gryllida/js/afch2.js is a copypaste, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gryllida/common.js loads it [12:21:34] what did i miss? [12:21:40] the tab doesn't appear [12:25:40] gry: it sounds like a separate issue. I filed a bug anyway. [[bugzilla:59993]] [12:26:20] whym_away, ok [12:30:45] whym_away, looks like a PoolCounter overload [12:31:05] try making a null edit? [12:34:23] fyi fixed my previous question by plural in first param [12:36:37] no change in http://translatewiki.net/w/i.php?title=MediaWiki:Mainpage/ja&action=history [12:39:20] MaxSem: I made a null edit to the main page, nothing changes. [12:43:21] whym_away, fixed [12:43:42] the bug should remain in place to investigate the underlying cause [12:44:16] MaxSem: thanks a lot, at least for now :) [12:47:48] My bug is to arrange the contents of select box in alphabetical order. I have found the php file which must changed but I don't know how I must proceed. So how should I proceed? The file to changed is core/core/includes/WatchedItem.php [12:59:38] MaxSem: "overload" is happening again at the main page of ja.wikipedia.org. [12:59:49] fuck [13:00:10] why did it get purged? [13:00:27] whym_away, is there a bot purging it or something? [13:00:54] MaxSem: no, as far as I know [13:01:18] it's extremely suspicious why it's o hosed [13:01:19] ddos or something, using the purge action? [14:22:08] My bug is to arrange the contents of select box in alphabetical order. I have found the php file which must changed but I don't know how I must proceed. So how should I proceed? The file to changed is core/core/includes/WatchedItem.php [17:49:20] hi, I'm new in wikimedia. and I'm trying to fix a little bug. so once I am in a bug with status NEW in bugzilla, I suppose that,first of all, I have to ASSIGN the problem to me.. an than change something in the code to submit the patch in gerrit... [17:49:37] No [17:49:43] You don't have to assign a bug to yourself [17:49:51] You can just leave a comment saying you're working on it [17:50:43] hum.. ok! but how the status of the problem change to ASSIGNED? [17:51:16] You need the editbugs right I believe [17:55:32] Saboia: it's not strictly needed, and it'll be set to assigned if need be. Don't worry about it too much. [17:55:45] go forth and hack instead of worrying about bug states! [17:56:32] ok! thanks... [17:56:49] :) [18:02:25] right now i'm viewing a bug which is a BetaFeatures component. how can I know the project that I have to work.. for exeple, the betaFeatures compentet is part of the mediawiki/core project on gerrit, or I have to clone another project? [18:03:50] Saboia: What feature has a bug? [18:05:43] this bug: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59955 [18:06:28] it appear in the "annoying little bugs" (http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Annoying_little_bugs) [18:06:29] whew, I waited the right amount of time for marktraceur to respond [18:08:32] Saboia: That's the BetaFeatures extension itself [18:10:11] a few days ago, when Typography refresh is enabled, Wikipedia pages get squished and don't take up the full width of the screen. [18:10:27] on purpose [18:10:38] ie: that was part of the refresh [18:10:46] really? [18:10:49] yeah [18:10:51] it's awful! [18:10:57] makes reading easier (so says the studies) [18:11:25] there's a bug about it [18:11:48] ragesoss: How did you not realise that was a feature!? [18:11:49] well, it was closed as wontfix, but another opened about renaming the feature to something else [18:12:08] Squishy pages [18:12:25] ok! thats right.. sorry for the stupid question.. [18:12:26] I thought we were going to like bring the images out to the side or something when we started that. [18:12:41] dunno, ask jon [18:12:42] Saboia: No such thing :) [18:12:51] I mean, I like columns of text. but that's different than "just jam the whole content into a max-width div" [18:12:53] * greg-g is staying out of it [18:13:16] betafeature == I don't care unless they want to make it default to non-betafeature people [18:13:19] ;) [18:13:26] ragesoss: Join the bug party http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59815 [18:13:38] or not, might be better for your health not to [18:14:20] I have been having oodles of fun people-watching on the bug. [18:14:41] <^d> You need a new hobby. [18:16:30] I just assumed I had somehow broken Firefox at first. [18:16:48] why. won't. these. settings. clear? [18:17:41] then I figured it must be that something in the typography refresh just wasn't compatible with my system. [18:27:59] * aude assumed it was a bug! [18:41:02] okay, I've had my say on the wiki thread. thanks for pointing me in the right direction, greg-g. [18:41:56] np [18:53:00] well, for sure this triggered a lot of participation on mediawiki.org http://vs.aka-online.de/cgi-bin/wppagehiststat.pl?lang=www.mediawiki&page=Talk%3ATypography+refresh [19:04:13] Reedy: Did you guys deploy new search at the nlwp? [19:04:22] I'm not involved [19:04:26] Ask ^d or manybubbles [19:04:51] ok. I just ran into a search bug (redirects not working). What should I file it under? [19:09:49] multichill: cirrus [19:09:59] k [19:10:20] Seems to be a glitch, now I get results, weird [19:11:15] multichill: nlwiki? [19:11:37] there's a comment on disregarded redirects on [[mw:Talk:Search]] too [19:12:21] I saw that one. it is on my list to investigate today [19:12:40] We use "wp:k" to go to the local village pump [19:12:41] but I'm still trying to trace down the old search index not updating [19:17:08] multichill: lowercase or uppercase? [19:46:17] Am I correct that there is no way to answer the question "what users have made their Nth edit in the past X days" via the API? [19:47:48] abartov: definitely not directly this way [19:51:34] Danny_B, thanks, that's what I thought. [23:26:18] TimStarling: Any idea where wmgUseDualLicense is actually used? [23:27:45] it should be used [23:28:17] There's no usage in CommonSettings.php or WikimediaMessages [23:36:49] Reedy: You mean called or ...? It's referenced in InitialiseSettings.php. [23:36:54] No [23:36:58] It's defined in IS [23:37:09] Nowhere actually seems to do anything based on it [23:44:00] Hmmmm. [23:44:10] I see https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40459#c2 now. [23:44:31] Statistically, most of the wikis aren't dual licensed [23:44:46] Right. [23:45:05] The spacing in that section is also drunk. [23:45:16] PHP cares not about your whitespace [23:45:50] Well this is a real mystery! [23:46:30] <^d> Gloria: I care about your whitespace. Don't feel unloved. [23:46:48] https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#7._Licensing_of_Content [23:47:19] The UseDual config seems to go all the way back to Roan's import. [23:47:52] Well, based on wikimania wikis alone, it's been the case since 2009 or so [23:48:11] "Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy." [23:48:16] Everywhere seems to use the singular [23:48:28] I've never understood the Retarded Capitalization. [23:49:14] <^d> Gloria: It's called Lawyer Speak. It's to show you the Important Parts of legal documents THAT YOU NEED TO READ. [23:49:23] https://git.wikimedia.org/blob/mediawiki%2Fextensions%2FWikimediaMessages.git/24b906e7a41b32ce0653115a452c5956e830bb81/WikimediaMessages.php [23:49:36] <^d> Gloria: VOID WHERE PROHIBITED. LAME EVERYWHERE. [23:49:51] NO WARRANTY PROVIDED. [23:49:54] Reedy: What about it? [23:50:23] That's where any variance is [23:50:31] if( strpos( $wgRightsUrl, 'creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0' ) !== false ) { [23:50:51] https://git.wikimedia.org/commitdiff/mediawiki%2Fextensions%2FWikimediaMessages.git/6b1869934e4e6908e62f9618e7be7199453fcc3f is what I remember. [23:50:59] I'm not sure why IS.php got changed. [23:51:14] got what changed when? [23:51:24] Why UseDualwhatever was added. [23:51:37] With instruction to specify it for every new wiki. [23:51:51] Well, otherwise you've got to list it for all wikis - new wiki [23:51:57] You need some way to differentiate [23:52:05] Differentiate why? [23:52:21] Because they have different licenes [23:52:23] Gloria: Some wikis are more equal than other wikis. [23:52:38] Older wikis are CC BY SA whereas newer ones are CC BY SA and GFDL? [23:52:43] No. [23:52:47] GFDL was first. [23:52:52] Whatever [23:52:54] The point is the same [23:52:57] Not really. [23:53:12] You can't retrospectively change a license without permission of authors [23:53:18] Gloria: Annoying Capitalization usually for defined terms: terms that refer to specific documents or words/phrases defined within the document you're looking at. (so "Privacy Policy" meaning there is some specific document called the Privacy Policy that refers to, not just any policy dealing with privacy.) [23:53:42] mindspillage: Literally no meaning is lost when you use sentence case. [23:54:25] Gloria: I don't think that's true in many cases actually--but here just explaining the lawyerism. [23:54:26] "you agree to the terms of use and privacy policy." with links isn't ambiguous. [23:54:42] It's irksome. [23:55:13] The lawyerism, that is. ;-) [23:55:29] Reedy: Did you figure out why that variable exists? [23:55:31] I was still looking. [23:55:45] [23:27:42] it should be used [23:55:53] The question atm is why it isn't [23:56:03] Because we're showing the wrong licensing footers etc [23:56:20] Heh, yeah, I guess we are. [23:56:50] <^d> mindspillage: Why do lawyers YELL AT YOU? [23:56:55] The override in place is the string change for CC BY SA 3 being in the rightsurls [23:57:03] <^d> mindspillage: THIS PARAGRAPH IS IMPORTANT, SO I SHALL YELL AT YOU. [23:57:14] Same reason. [23:57:49] GitHub says operations-mediawiki-config is JavaScript. [23:57:58] That seems sensible. [23:58:55] Skewed by DolphinBrowser [23:59:35] Prior to being in Git, the Wikimedia config files were in some other VCS, weren't they? [23:59:42] Yup [23:59:45] svn