[00:00:32] lfaraone: yes, IIRC, you are specifically mentioned on the ticket [00:00:41] am I. [00:00:50] * lfaraone is feeling amnisatic, I guess [00:01:00] < lfaraone> Hmm, does the WMF have any affiliation with the [00:01:01] http://enwp.org/ redirect? [00:01:07] < lfaraone> (I often do or similar) [00:01:19] hehe, I remember this now. [00:01:22] i put that in the ticket 2013-04-08 13:31:51 [00:01:28] UTC [00:01:35] RT 822 [00:01:57] lfaraone: seems like the current owner didn't reply to our last few mails [00:02:34] lfaraone: and ops gave up and closed the ticket. i suppose someone else could run with it a bit. (i thought about doing it myself) [00:03:14] we mailed him 2013-05-15 18:48:57 UTC, seems like he never replied to that [00:03:18] lfaraone [00:03:36] I seeeeeeeee. [00:12:40] bbl [00:59:14] hmm, does Special:DisableAccount add users to the "disabled" user group? I see some users on a wiki with that property, others with "inactive user" which appears to be a togglable bit. [01:03:31] iirc, yes [01:05:13] lfaraone, uh, it's actually the 'inactive' user group, which might be called 'disabled' on some wikis I guess... [01:05:47] I see some users with the "inactive user" group (wikilinked), and some users with "disabled" (non-linked), both on arbcom_en [01:05:50] Krenair: ^^ [01:07:08] well, on private wikis bureaucrats can remove the group 'inactive' [01:07:45] and add to the group as well [01:07:48] I see. So I guess these are two different usergroups that have the same effect but one is changable and the other isn't? [01:08:54] I don't really know where the 'disabled' user group comes from [01:16:41] Krenair: E:DisabledAccount most likely [01:16:55] ... :| [01:17:06] which should be used carefully, As you need DBA access to revert it [01:18:19] *DisableAccount [01:39:40] QueenOfFrance, so i hear more logs have been leaked [11:11:37] ob http://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/pcount/index.php?name=Davidmuecke96&lang=www&wiki=mediawiki [11:27:18] wow str4nd, no new messages since 2008 in wikifi-l http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikifi-l/ [11:29:51] edwardsbot still alive? [11:30:43] maybe for a day or two [11:30:58] Why? [11:31:22] extension cant serve vps or what [11:31:58] vps? O_o [11:32:17] anyway, ask on [[m:Talk:MassMessage]] or whatever [11:32:25] Village pumps [11:32:29] Nemo_bis, oh :) [11:32:41] !link [11:32:42] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/$wiki_encoded_* [11:32:47] @link [11:32:47] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:MassMessage [11:35:50] Base-w: MassMessage is designed to replace EdwardsBot, it can do the village pumps [11:36:12] (apart from one small bug or two that need to have deployments done to fix) [11:37:47] Ah technews gone to user talks by the extension but to vp by the bot [11:38:41] Then technews in vp has wrong info about by what it was delivered) [11:38:52] Gloria is the one to talk to anyway [18:05:47] greg-g: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49860#c86 [18:05:56] why not merging this in the coming window? [18:06:44] twkozlowski: not a strong reason either way, but now I would feel bad changing plans with less than an hours notice. [18:07:06] the plan was to disable it by Dec 31 [18:07:17] Dec 30 is, indeed, "by Dec 31" [18:07:38] sure [18:08:23] Reedy: opinion on the matter? I defer to you on this. ^^^ [18:08:44] I unsubscribed from this name-calling of a bug a long time ago, and I only noticed your comment five minutes ago [18:08:54] so sorry for not bringing this up earlier :) [18:09:17] twkozlowski: mostly, I didn't have in my head a hard "must be done by $date" instead "should be done around $date" so that's why I delayed it instead of moving it up due to the holiday [18:09:27] * greg-g shrugs [18:10:18] not to imply non-caring, just, ugh, if there are strong reasons to do it today instead of thursday, we can do it. [18:13:07] twkozlowski: be patient :) [18:14:15] * Reedy shrugs [18:14:24] jfdi [18:14:33] (in an hour or so) [18:14:52] Juvenile Diabetes Foundation International [18:14:58] no, that's no it... [18:15:09] sure, any time is good if reedy feels like it [18:15:18] :) [18:15:30] I like the description in Urban Dictionary [18:15:37] twkozlowski: you could subscribe though, you'll need it with all the sweeties they'll send you from Brasil [18:15:39] A common IT software development term used to describe a request, generally from a manager to a developer, to just get it done (JFDI) and don't worry about testing or documentation or any other formal development requirement. [18:16:09] spot-on! [18:16:18] Just Get It Done [18:16:24] JGID != JFDI [18:16:45] censorship! [18:16:52] That's the description for JFDI, Reedy [18:18:24] they might have confused the two terms, but meh [18:18:47] on an unrelated subject [18:18:54] A database query error has occurred. This may indicate a bug in the software. [18:18:57] Function: IndexPager::buildQueryInfo (LogPager) [18:19:00] Error: 0 [18:19:08] Where? [18:19:18] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Log/block/Russavia [18:19:28] what an apt url [18:21:41] Mon Dec 30 18:14:54 UTC 2013 mw1188 commonswiki IndexPager::buildQueryInfo (LogPager) 10.64.16.9 0 SELECT log_id,log_type,log_action,log_timestamp,log_user,log_user_text,log_namespace,log_title,log_comment,log_params,log_deleted,user_id,user_name,user_editcount,(SELECT GROUP_CONCAT(ct_tag SEPARATOR ',') FROM `change_tag` WHERE ct_log_id=log_id ) AS ts_tags FROM `logging` LEFT JOIN `user` ON [18:21:41] ((log_user=user_id)) WHERE log_type = 'block' AND log_user = '150943' ORDER BY log_timestamp DESC LIMIT 501 [18:21:53] I'm guessing it timed out or something [20:35:19] Reedy: is this a bugable offence? [20:35:44] Drama works well on NYD