[02:20:44] does anyone know why the subject/headline input box on the "add new section" page has a 255 character limit? [02:25:29] YairRand: because it becomes the edit summary, which has a 255 character limit. [02:27:07] legoktm: they do? then how come when I put in 255 characters into the subject box, it still has characters left over to include the words "new section"? [02:28:45] uh, not sure about that [04:24:08] can i get help with the vector skin on here i tried in #mediawiki and #wikimedia-dev [06:22:29] Why does the parser seem to parse out span attributes like class names when building the TOC? (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Ln#Proposal_for_update_of_Template:La for more background) [06:24:12] @ping [06:24:15] !ping [06:24:16] Pong. [06:24:23] ^ping [06:24:30] &ping [06:24:36] meh [06:25:15] !bzsearch TOC html attributes [06:25:25] !bz TOC html attributes [06:25:25] https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/TOC [06:25:42] !bz TOC+html+attributes [06:25:42] https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/TOC+html+attributes [06:33:18] Not finding anything about it on bugzilla... I'll file a new bug for it this weekend. Goodnight and happy thanksgiving if you're into that sort of thing... [11:37:32] Hi, anyone has any idea why editing a section through API always results in ? [11:37:59] removing "basetimestamp" would let the edit go through though [11:38:15] and I'm sure the page is not actually in conflict [11:38:35] a tech currently online? [11:50:07] jimmyxu: iirc there are some bugs filed about it, the expected behaviour is not obvious [11:55:35] Nemo_bis: seems that in recent bug reports although editconflict is being reported, the edit still went through [13:19:38] from http://ee-dashboard.wmflabs.org/datasources , how does one get a perma/deeplink to a graph? [20:33:55] uhm, did somebody update the revdelete extension recently? [20:34:12] it looks like the meaning of the word "hidden" and "visible" have been swapped... [20:36:18] not an extension, I guess. [20:37:04] revdelete extension doesn't exist [20:37:18] and yes there was a wrong change, iirc fixed already [20:37:37] Nemo_bis: it was problematic as of 10 minutes ago [20:38:44] lfaraone: I mean fixed in master, not live [20:38:49] ah, okay. [20:39:58] I'm looking for the bug in question, but there are about half a dozen on revdelete/oversight terminology, soo... [20:45:20] I'm gonna cry, why isn't it here https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?f1=blocked&list_id=254222&o1=equals&chfieldto=Now&query_format=advanced&chfield=bug_status&chfieldfrom=-1m&v1=38638%20&product=MediaWiki [22:29:08] hoo: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki_talk:Wdsearch.js#Script_error [22:29:23] * hoo clicks [22:30:46] he suggests to add if v.claims && [22:30:55] for the properties without claims [22:31:26] I'll take a look in a minute [22:43:52] Nemo_bis: Done [22:44:31] great [22:54:28] Whouhou. Custom patches for porting Bugzilla from 4.2 to 4.4 done! (Sorry, have to share this with somebody) [22:54:41] \o/ [22:57:39] plus finally found out how to get Mozilla's Needinfo extension to work ( https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36064#c19 ) [22:57:48] which is something to try after upgrading [22:59:26] Oh, that's an extension :D /me likes it [23:04:31] we need a way to mark tickets as "needs input, not actionable" [23:04:47] there are two ways: create a status NEEDINFO, or use that extension based on a flag. [23:04:56] both have advantages and disadvantages... [23:06:23] mh, can't tell that... but I can tell that I at times need stuff like that [23:08:17] we do need some way. [23:08:31] oh well, we do need many things. My list is long :D [23:09:10] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Bug_management/Task_list#Plans_for_Q4.2F2013 for the list for this quarter ;) [23:21:35] andre__: congrats on the 4.2->4.4 patches! [23:22:22] greg-g: no holiday? :) [23:22:42] YuviPanda: I've been on vacation all week, but IRC is still a part of my life, for better or worse [23:22:55] (worse) [23:22:58] awww :D [23:23:23] greg-g: Thanks. I hope to get the upgrade done by this year. Now it's more like in ops hands... [23:25:32] sweet [23:38:35] andre__: hasn't nearly everybody on bugzilla the editbugs right? I'm missing it :) [23:39:48] se4598: there's a bug for that :P https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40497 [23:39:57] se4598, paste your Bugzilla email address in a private message, and I'll hand them out [23:41:21] se4598, done. Enjoy :) [23:42:07] andre__: thanks, MatmaRex: I know this one :)