[06:39:05] Hmm [06:57:53] shouldn't the local sidebars point to UploadWizard now...? wgUploadNavigationUrl https://noc.wikimedia.org/conf/highlight.php?file=InitialiseSettings.php [08:15:54] UploadWizard is great for batches, but I have to admit I far prefer the basic upload for single images [08:16:11] But then, I usually have things that need HORRIBLY COMPLICATED information templates. [08:16:56] I do wish UploadWizard allowed direct editing of the Information templates. As it is, I generally just upload everything as CC-by and "To be updated" in the information field. [08:17:17] Then edit it after [08:37:05] Well, that's a weird bug [08:37:25] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28technical%29#Font_changes_in_the_source_editor [08:41:13] known [08:48:57] of course bugs always appear either on friday or during a flight [10:01:25] someone has experience with aws? [10:01:42] I try teh amazon micro instance but it's freaking slow [10:01:58] it's even slower than instances on labs :D [19:54:19] Hello I've know many powerfull spell checker lib but they are all writen in C or there programing language port rely on C binaries. Does a C/C++ lib for creating wikipedia bot exist? [19:58:33] ytrezq: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Client_code#C.2B.2B ? [20:00:53] Do you think libmedia could be what I am lookin' for? [20:01:10] libmedia. I mean libmediawiki [20:05:26] Does libmediawiki need Xorg. the server where I want to make the bot run have 32Mo of RAM. When it is powerd up, only two are free. [20:10:14] ytrezq: very historic ;-) [20:13:25] DaBPunkt: "very historic" I don't understand what you mean [20:13:43] a computer with only 32MB of memory [20:13:48] ytrezq: I have no idea at all, but if you find a better solution please add it to that section [20:13:49] because it's where the answer to your question should be [20:24:55] Not historic at all, but embeded(http://www.broadcom.com/products/Broadband-Carrier-Access/xDSL-CPE-Solutions/BCM6358). It is mips based microcontroller which contain many things such as an ADSL modulator (in fact it is diretly plugged to the phone line); a MIni MGCP terminal; a configurable switch. [20:26:24] There is a lot more for the list became complete.On top of that, It's consomation are only some mW [20:28:25] It run linux.But there are no graphics card and no screen output (You control it with telenet or ssh). That's why I am asking if libmediawiki need an Xorg server. [20:28:44] Question: Does [[MediaWiki:Signature]] do anything? [20:34:38] YairRand: that is the default signature. [20:34:38] and if it doesn't do anything, is there an equivalent that works now? [20:35:35] It is what is used by everyone not using a custom signature. [20:35:51] T13: It doesn't seem to be. for example, on enwikt the contents of that message is "[[{{ns:user}}:$1|$2]] ([[{{ns:user_talk}}:$1|talk]])", but I don't see mediawiki message code being dumped into every talk page [20:36:50] Looks like what is subst in to me... [20:36:57] and on enwiki, it includes a #top in the talk page link, but that doesn't appear to actually go onto any talk pages [20:37:28] Are you looking at current or default version? [20:37:56] And #top may be parsed out. [20:37:56] current on enwiki, default on enwikt [20:38:46] !subst [20:38:46] Substitution is automatic conversion of wikitext of a page referring to a templatehttp://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Template, variable, or parser function when the referring page is saved. You can read more about it on http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Substitution [20:39:23] so if someone actually added something to it, would unchanged signatures actually be modified? [20:40:08] Yes, new ones would. Existing ones wouldn't change. [20:40:40] also: does it do a repeated kind of subst, or just once? ie, would using {nosubst} in it allow for templates or messages to be included? [20:42:05] the reason I'm asking is that I'd like to have the default signature actually transclude {{int:Talkpagelinktext}} in each signature, so that it shows up correctly in each user's language [20:44:10] (non-substed) [20:44:27] is this possible? [20:47:18] YairRand: probably the only way to find out for sure is to try it [20:47:28] it's annoying when a multilingual wiki always shows talk signatures in English to non-English speakers, even when both the page's language and the signer's language aren't English [20:47:45] YairRand: also, that might be a bad idea for performance reasons, but i don't even have any numbers to pull out of my ass to back this up [20:47:46] MatmaRex: I don't have a testing wiki to work with [20:47:58] YairRand: http://users.v-lo.krakow.pl/~matmarex/testwiki/index.php?title=Main_Page you're welcome [20:48:12] YairRand: i can give you the rights after you create an account [20:48:26] MatmaRex: thank you :) [20:50:35] MatmaRex: account created [21:28:46] Hello. Sorry for asking again. I know many powerfull spell checker lib but they are all writen in C or there programing language port rely on C binaries. Does a C/C++ lib (WHICH DON'T NEED an Xserver) for creating wikipedia bot exist ? [21:29:10] ytrezq: no [21:29:22] Thanks :) [21:31:55] libaspell won't work? [22:55:06] YairRand: re, #top, the default signature gets set upon account creation i think, so any changes to the MediaWiki:signature message only apply to new accounts [22:55:26] I see new accounts on enwiki that have #top in their signature, but older accounts don't automatically switch over [22:55:54] legoktm: strange, that's not what happened on the test wiki [22:56:04] oh, what happened? [22:56:32] changes to the message change the signature even of already-created accounts [22:56:45] m [22:56:47] hm* [22:57:00] maybe if the user changes it, it won't automatically change? [22:57:07] maybe [22:58:07] yeah probably, because its a user preference [23:07:16] gn8 folks [23:51:19] legoktm: Older users have custom signatures. [23:51:29] Because they wanted, for example, a talk page link. [23:51:38] yeah [23:51:55] MediaWiki:Signature applies to all accounts. [23:52:07] It just doesn't apply if someone is using a custom sig. [23:52:10] Right [23:54:11] Like I already told you hours ago. [23:54:15] lol [23:55:14] I don't think you're really laughing out loud. [23:56:39] I really am.