[00:47:33] Why is "X-Frame-Options:DENY" only for the current revision and not previous one? [03:27:33] Score seems to be erroring.. [03:27:43] > Unable to copy the generated files to their final location: An unknown error occurred in storage backend "global-ceph". [03:35:07] someone in -en-help just received this error message when he tries to save his article: [fe5ef81c] 2013-05-31 03:26:11: Fatal exception of type MWException [03:35:21] any idea what causes that, or how it might be resolved? [03:38:01] Huon: Which article? [03:38:38] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Igor_Zaripov [03:38:50] no idea what change he wants to implement [03:40:19] Shit seems a bit broken ATM with thumbnails. [03:40:29] I think the image scalers are having a rough time. [04:00:49] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Gryllida/t/Album why does it only work with subst: ? [04:02:59] What's the name of the auto-kick bot on freenode? I thought it was named gry... [04:03:26] Susan: eir? [04:03:26] There's eir and there's another one... [04:03:41] sir manages bans. Isn't there one to kick flooders? [04:03:43] idoru :) [04:03:46] Oh, right. [04:04:11] Heh, sir. Fuck you, autocorrect. [04:04:28] Though I kind of hate eir, so it's not going in my dictionary. [04:04:45] gry: Why do you think it has to be substituted? Other than the documentation saying so? [04:04:53] I'm previewing it on the talk page and it looks fine. [04:05:07] I made the template and it didn't work, so I tried subst'ing it and it worked, but I don't know why [04:05:17] Didn't work how? [04:05:37] Thumbnail generation on Wikimedia wikis would have been wonky the past hour or two. [04:05:41] the hidden gallery has the gallery tag in raw instead of being itself [04:05:53] Hmmm. Link to an example? [04:05:56] Is it still doing it? [04:06:05] example is in the documentation link, yeah [04:06:37] Oh, I see. [04:06:41] there is three examples, using template as is, using template substitution, and one manually typed version of what I think it should be like [04:06:52] Weird. [04:06:59] The expand/collapse is Commons-specific JS? [04:07:03] and the first one of the three doesn't work :) [04:07:07] perhaps [04:07:49] Hmmm. [04:07:52] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Hidden [04:08:35] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:CollapsibleTemplates.js [04:08:44] It may be a bug in that. It may be a parser bug. [04:08:54] I don't think substitution should be necessary. [04:23:33] oops, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Gallery explained me what I did wrong [04:25:40] using #tag gallery worked without subst... thanks :) [10:58:00] anyone online that happens to know the recommended method for dealing with errors in a job run with /maintenance/runJobs.php - how should the job report errors? should the job always return true so that no orphan jobs stay in the queue? [11:36:27] suddenly stopped working on English Wikiversity with the error message that the texvc executable is missing [11:37:44] http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Colloquium#LaTeX_error [11:38:15] math seems to still be working on English Wikipedia and English Wikibooks when I tested it there [11:41:50] math is also broken on Beta Wikiversity with the same error message [11:50:32] version issues (config maybe) [11:52:36] nice, there is no /usr/local/apache/uncommon/1.22wmf5 on terbium [11:52:41] (deploy host) [11:52:48] so naturally no bin dir so naturally no texvc binary [11:53:17] it's on fenari, maybe I can do something useful about this [11:54:00] ah no it isn't there either. meh [12:00:39] !log ran scap-recompile to get texvc built for 1.22wmf5 and btw this had to be done from fenari, there's no dsh on terbium [12:00:47] Logged the message, Master [12:03:54] !log uh... it would help if I looked on tin, the actual deploy host so nm. anyways texvc now working [12:04:03] Logged the message, Master [16:14:59] PHP fatal error in /usr/local/apache/common-local/php-1.22wmf5/extensions/LiquidThreads/classes/Hooks.php line 667: [16:14:59] Call to a member function getPrefixedText() on a non-object [16:15:31] What URL and what action are you trying to do? [16:16:45] I was doing XML import using Special:Import; nothing related to LQT as far as I can see [16:17:27] Ah, perhaps a namespace issue? [16:18:09] i.e. LQT is not on the source wiki but is on the target wiki, so maybe there's a namespace conflict [16:18:36] plenty of pages were imported before the error though [16:18:47] if a title is coming through null it's probably expecting a certain page to exist and it doesn't [16:19:11] This might be https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41056 [16:19:27] Although this is further down the file than those [16:19:51] hmmm [16:21:18] * guillom is annoyed. [16:23:01] It's not a namespace conflict issue with LQT; there's no conflict. [16:43:54] question: when Special:Import is used with the option to import all transcluded pages, does it import only the ones that show up in "View templates on this page", or does it also import pages that are on the the transcluded pages (and hence not actually included in the main target)? [17:38:38] If I wanted to refire all the onload stuff from the console, how would I do it? [17:50:07] a930913, try $( document.body ).trigger( 'load' ) [17:53:00] Krenair: Just tracked down window.runOnloadHook. Would that be better? [17:53:11] not sure tbh [17:53:24] a930913: That's an old legacy function which (should) is barely used today [17:53:31] so would only trigger legacy stuff [17:53:48] hoo: What's the new way? [17:54:11] $( document ).trigger( 'load' ); would probably work [17:54:36] Nope, doesn't seem to be. [17:55:02] hoo: As in what's the new way to add an onload hook? [17:56:17] I've run a $('html').load("//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?... so I'm trying to kick Twinkle and stuff to work. [17:56:43] a930913: $( document ).ready( function() {} ); [17:57:03] You can't re run .ready as it seems... I was wrong [17:57:24] .ready() fires on DOM Ready probably not onload (which would be much later) [17:59:11] Krenair: Yes this is hacking around the rollback frame deny :p [18:00:59] Bah, g2g. I'll pick up replies when I get back. [18:03:25] hoo: I've CC'd you to https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49019 [18:04:23] Is this related to your patrol overhaul? [18:04:50] Krenair: Probably that's the thing in gerrit which is marked as deployement blocker but nobody cared to actually deploy ... [18:07:01] hoo: I was thinking of https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/41196/ [18:07:14] It doesn't seem to mention deploy or block anywhere [18:07:20] Krenair: The bug does [18:07:26] ah wait [18:07:35] wrong gerrit one [18:07:41] https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/65958 [18:07:47] that one actually needs deploying [18:09:02] So https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49019 is a dupe of https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48928 ? [18:09:26] Krenair: Probably [18:09:37] If not we got a bug I don't know about yet, but I doubt that [18:09:39] brb [18:38:20] no ^demon? [19:20:54] hoo: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49022 [19:22:03] finally one I can (maybe) verify [20:10:42] hi brandon [20:10:49] welcome back from AMS! [20:10:57] oh, i didn't go to AMS. [20:11:07] i mean bblack [20:11:09] sorry [20:11:37] oh. heh. [20:29:49] * AaronSchulz stares at bug https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48928 [20:30:06] jorm: I think someone needs to look at this all from a UI perspective [20:30:15] it seems kind like a total mess [20:31:29] jorm: is "patrolling" supposed to mean "patrolling revisions as changes" or "patrolling revisions as versions"? [20:31:51] in my experience, the term "patrolling" changes meaning depending on the user. [20:32:21] usually it's got a suffix: "New page patrol" or "Recent changes patrol" [20:32:26] i'm not sure i understand this bug. [20:32:37] it it's the former then only diffs should have [Mark as patrolled], though pages where the initial revision is not yet patrolled would also have [Mark page as patrolled] when viewed [20:33:31] hrm. [20:33:48] jorm: the patch in gerrit (https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/65958) is to make new page entries in RC have a link parameter that makes [Mark as patrolled] be for the "creation revision" and not the one being viewed [20:34:01] i think it's an issue of hierarchy. of importantance. [20:34:21] as of wmf5, viewing pages should "mark as patrolled" links for the revision being reviewed if unreviewed [20:34:26] it seems to me that New Pages that have not been marked as "Page Patrolled' take precedence over changes made to them. [20:34:39] this would be an exception, though would match older behavior more [20:34:40] You're looking at the whole page as a unit, all revisions, before marking it patrolled. [20:34:57] i'd say that pages that are "new" do not have "mark change as patrolled" functions. it seems pointless to me. [20:35:22] it's funny that if I look at revision #2, and both #1 and #2 are not patrolled, it will have a link to "patrol the page" [20:35:35] refreshing the page would then have the same link accept if would be for revision #2 [20:35:45] right. and "patrol the page" should mark all revisions as patrolled. [20:35:50] I get that the new page patrol is more important, but the UI just sucks [20:36:04] which is why we made Special:NewPagesFeed [20:36:07] (note I wasn't part of the wmf5 change that was merged) [20:36:16] and to be fair, it was also bad before [20:36:33] AaronSchulz: On some wikis NPP is more important, but on wikis like wikidata RCPatrol is way more important [20:36:49] good point. [20:36:49] I'm struggling with "merge this now as a hot fix" or "wait and let people really think about this" [20:37:06] i think you've answered your struggle here, aaron. [20:37:31] indeed [20:37:31] the fact that there is confusion says "this should be thought about." [20:37:54] * AaronSchulz was asked to merge/deploy that earlier today [20:38:00] * AaronSchulz was busy with file backend stuff [20:38:18] so yeah, then I'm not touching this with a 10-ft pool then :) [21:06:17] greg-g: is it kosher to make config changes on Fridays? [21:06:44] "depends" [21:06:46] ;) [21:06:59] that's what I thought you'd say :) [21:07:04] kaldari: enabling big new hunk of code that hasn't been turned on somewhere, no [21:07:16] something more reasonable, maybe :) [21:07:43] how did you know I wanted to enable a big new hunk of code that hasn't been turned on somewhere? :) [21:07:56] hahaha [21:08:19] anyway, that answers my question [21:08:24] ok [21:08:36] I suppose I can wait until Monday :) [21:09:47] <^demon> greg-g: Can we enable every extension today? [21:09:54] <^demon> ;-) [21:10:06] ^demon: :P