[00:01:41] 1am, not too bad [00:05:39] <^demon|busy> Reedy: I'm gonna merge the redirect thing. [00:07:22] <^demon|busy> sync-docroot isn't going to delete those files, is it :\ [00:08:54] <^demon|busy> sync-common, even [00:11:02] sync-dir w should be enough [00:11:30] <^demon|busy> Eh, sync-common already in progress. [00:20:45] <^demon|busy> Reedy: slow sync-common is slow. [00:23:22] Hence saying to use sync-dir ;) [11:22:29] :q [15:02:17] The abuse filter is at an all time low. It keeps 504 now. [15:02:38] you could provide more details... [15:02:44] what URL specifically [15:02:56] is there some further error msg or just 504? [15:04:17] jeremyb_, same as usual IP lookups. [15:04:44] I'm loading it again but it 504ed 3 times consecutively. [15:05:37] maybe you should move to a smaller wiki :-P [15:06:14] jeremyb_, and drag all of ACC along with it? :p [15:06:30] Jeff_Green, [15:06:30] erm [15:06:33] well idk what you're doing... [15:06:34] wrong person [15:06:38] 504 Gateway Time-out [15:06:38] nginx/1.1.19 [15:06:38] i don't get a 504 [15:06:44] i get a 500! [15:06:57] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchUser=65.23.21.162 [15:07:11] One of many that don't work. [15:07:42] i have a lock wait timeout hitting db1056 [15:07:55] s1 master [15:08:00] don't know what that means. [15:08:17] so 1st question is why is this special page hitting a master... [15:09:15] ok, *now* i got a 504 [15:09:26] :p [15:09:36] but that 500 was much more informative [15:10:14] Acc is handling dozens of requests everyday. Now multiple dozens by 45-60 seconds just for waiting on an abuse filter. [15:10:45] Can't this be fixed immediately? [15:16:27] Cyberpower678: err, no. sometimes you have to wait for people to wake up? also, that lock wait timeout i got is a much better clue than the 504s [15:23:28] Either way, I just hope it's fixed soon as the problem seems to be getting worse. [15:24:05] Cyberpower678: well does it *ever* work? [15:24:12] i've never seen it succeed i think? [15:24:30] (even a week ago or whenever we last discussed it) [15:24:39] or do you only show up to complain when it's really bad? [15:26:29] I only show to complain when it's really bad. I usually wait about 30-45 seconds for a page to load. Now it's not loading. [15:27:41] Attempting to load abuse filter [15:28:26] OMG it loaded. [15:30:26] Carry on. [15:31:38] errr, no. that's the problem [15:31:41] don't carry on. [15:31:45] get it fixed... [15:31:54] Cyberpower678: are you on bugzilla? is this filed yet? [15:32:54] jeremyb_, yes, somewhere [15:33:56] !b 47045 [15:33:56] https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/47045 [16:43:36] I was looking through my user preferences -- can someone remind me what the "Quickbar" is? [16:58:45] If I submitted a patch to update a project's favicon and there wasn't a bug for it, should I create a bug for it? [16:59:58] Also apparently I accidentally made it depend on the mw.org favicon because I forgot to change branches or something. [17:00:07] Should every favicon have a different patch? [17:00:27] Isarra, has it been discussed on the project? [17:02:03] Krenair: Nope! [17:02:13] ...should it be? [17:02:21] Usually [17:02:42] What's to discuss? [17:03:18] Only changes are generally just adding a high-res variant and making the render of the low-res smoother. [17:03:37] Why did you name a branch 'dfsgdfgjh'? [17:03:45] I think I was drunk. [17:03:59] Then again I would have done that anyway, probably... [17:04:08] I don't get along well with git. [17:04:14] This is my new favourite channel. [17:04:56] Whyso? [17:05:53] Isarra, it depends what the change is [17:06:11] If you're changing the design it should probably be discussed [17:06:30] As it seems you're just making it look better (resolution etc.) it should be okay [17:07:26] How much discussion is needed before deploying such things? [17:07:34] Just a general review? [17:07:59] These particular changes? I'd say none, they should be completely uncontroversial [17:08:02] Isarra: "Why did you name a branch 'dfsgdfgjh'" "I think I was drunk." <-- that's why [17:08:40] <^demon|brb> Dragonfly6-7: It was a floating sidebar for cologne blue and a couple of other older skins. It didn't work well (and was totally removed from cologne blue) so it's slated for removal. [17:08:44] <^demon|brb> Not sure if it's merged yet. [17:08:47] Heh. [17:08:51] Krenair: Thanks. [17:09:06] It probably doesn't matter that one change relies on the other [17:09:07] Why are there two ori-ls? [17:09:27] It just won't be merged until the first has been [17:09:28] ori-l ori-l ? [17:09:38] Isarra: I only see one [17:09:42] ... There's only one ori-l in here, Isarra [17:09:56] Huh, guess my client got confused. [17:10:34] It's seeing double. [17:10:44] It didn't get into my stash, did it? [17:11:04] hm? [17:11:10] Bad joke. [17:11:23] sorry, it went right over my head :p [17:11:40] I was suggesting konversation also got drunk. [17:13:35] csteipp: see back around 15 UTC (channel log); and bug 47045 [17:14:39] So like with the wikipedia one, to get these other two favicons deployed, do I just need to get someone deploying something else to include them? [17:15:54] is it known that Safari has problems with the media player in MediaWiki to listen to sound? [17:16:07] mediawiki has no media player [17:16:36] Romaine- perhaps Safari has trouble with .ogg ? [17:16:58] that is the question [17:17:13] a user asks if this problem is known already [17:18:58] Isarra, with that repo I used to find that I didn't have to do anything but leave the patches in the queue and within a few days a shell user would deploy it [17:19:14] Oh, neat. [17:19:25] So I just need to poke someone into merging them? [17:19:29] But mwalker merged your wikipedia one, you could ask him to do these as well [17:19:40] what? [17:19:45] >.> [17:19:46] <.< [17:19:51] mwalker: Care to merge some favicons? [17:19:54] * Isarra grins. [17:20:10] https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/58463/ https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/59589/ https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/59809/ :P [17:20:18] depends on if I can get another lightening deploy today [17:20:39] I don't think this needs to be done today [17:20:52] It's favicon improving not exactly critical bug fixing [17:21:12] Aye. [17:22:15] [[Tech]]; DragonflySixtyseven; /* Classic skin and CSS */; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=5403493&oldid=5402168&rcid=4084801 [17:34:56] [[Tech]]; PiRSquared17; /* Global css/js */ +; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=5403501&oldid=5403493&rcid=4084823 [17:40:22] [[Tech]]; PiRSquared17; /* Classic skin and CSS */ +; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=5403505&oldid=5403501&rcid=4084842 [18:00:25] Hey Aaron|home, is it just coincidence that IP::prettifyIP also conforms to rfc5952 (for non special addresses)? Or was that intentional? [18:01:13] probably the former [18:33:09] there seems to be an uncommitted live change to wmf-config/wikiversions.dat on fenari [18:33:14] -wikidatawiki php-1.22wmf1 * [18:33:15] +wikidatawiki php-1.22wmf2 * [18:37:34] Reedy: ^ [18:37:51] actually that's just wikiversions.dat, not in wmf-config [18:38:15] Let me commit it [18:38:58] thanks [18:49:06] [[Tech]]; MZMcBride; /* Global css/js */ +reply; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=5403537&oldid=5403505&rcid=4084915 [19:26:12] just started scap [20:48:15] Aaron|home: ^^ [20:48:30] I found something in jobs log [22:41:36] I want to experiment with a hacked up version of Universal Language Selector on a labs version of en.Wikivoyage. Should I do this in Labs or in Beta? Is there a difference? [22:42:09] Beta: http://en.wikivoyage.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Main_Page [22:42:43] Labs: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Nova_Resource:Wikivoyage [22:43:34] The labs project, Wikivoyage, above has no wiki instances set up yet. So I would set that up, right? Or just use above Beta? [22:44:07] if you need to make software changes, you'll need to make them in your project [22:44:22] Okay, thanks [22:44:46] one sec [22:45:02] rogerhc: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Single_Node_MediaWiki [22:45:03] So I will set up a wiki instance of en.Wikivoyage in https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Nova_Resource:Wikivoyage. Right? [22:46:19] well, you'll set up a development instance [22:46:39] setting up something that works just like wikivoyage isn't really automated... [22:47:03] but you likely don't need everything to be exactly the same [22:52:12] rogerhc: you should likely ask labs questions in #wikimedia-labs [22:52:25] more likely to get labs questions answered by folks :) [22:53:06] ok, thanks