[00:40:36] Jeff_Green: To what? [00:40:36] Agh [00:40:36] Irssi hates me today [00:40:36] Jeff_Green: Sorry, not you :P [00:40:36] jeremyb_: To what? [00:46:32] gn8 folks [01:00:30] http://www.reddit.com/r/AdultDating18/comments/19u89j/italian_amateurs/ [01:03:28] wow, that's the first irc spam i've seen on this channel [01:06:35] perfect time for me to drop https://rt.wikimedia.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2494 your way LeslieCarr, that one's been open for a year now, if you have any comments feel free to add them on the ticket :) [01:07:15] um, yes we should [01:07:19] :) [01:07:41] 1 link being spammed isn't too bad though [01:11:29] <^demon> You have been awarded 10 million dollars. [01:11:57] <^demon> Send your social security number, bank information, and signature, and I will wire it to you RIGHT AWAY [01:14:29] * p858snake sends ^demon AntiSpamMeta's details [01:14:49] should they be sent in a next day delivery envelope? [01:20:58] p858snake: No, Western Union ;) [01:21:44] I wonder if there is even a WU merchant near me in brisbane... [01:21:53] also congrats on felling better RoanKattouw [01:22:53] Thanks :) [03:29:01] Hello, I have a question about Scribunto/Lua. Anyone around that happens to know anything about it? [03:30:19] Scott5115: You should ask rather than asking to ask. Anyone who knows will answer :) [03:30:34] heh [03:31:04] in that case, what exactly is the exact incantation I need to do to use the mw module? [03:31:32] For some reason, calling mw.log is causing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Module:LegendRJL to throw an error, and I can't figure out why [03:32:25] I'm guessing it's a scope issue of some sort, but I've read up on Lua scope rules, and nothing looks obviously out of order to me [03:32:49] I think you just do require("mw") [03:33:19] hm [03:33:21] maybe not [03:33:27] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Module:Convert has both ways... [03:33:37] I was using Module:Citation as a guide, and it uses the Module: prefix. [03:34:48] not sure then [10:24:49] petan: Uhoh, my fixes have stopped working [10:25:04] Same NRPE errors again, so this looks like puppet's doing [10:26:38] yes puppet overwrote it, I submitted a patch which fixes this [10:26:42] I need someone to merge it [10:27:03] Thanks :P [10:27:09] Also, I just realized I tabbed in to -tech instead of -labs :P [10:27:27] np [11:57:33] Read the message that Petr Bena left for you before it gets deleted! [12:01:50] who? [12:03:48] some more baddo spam :) [12:03:51] *badoo [12:09:28] ah. yeah. [12:20:51] Oh, intersting https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Deployment&action=edit&undoafter=51695&undo=8451 [12:20:57] Graham will like this [12:29:43] apergos: look what a mess https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Deployment&action=history [12:30:10] what component of MediaWiki (mis)calculated the size differences in this case? [12:31:48] amusing [12:32:08] all calculations are based on the redirect size [12:32:21] and that one is treated as being the first revision [12:33:30] what on earth for? [12:33:59] the redirect was obviously the first revision [12:34:05] the others were added on import [12:34:17] do all of them have rev_parent_id=8451 ? [12:35:12] in some definition of "first" [12:35:45] the revision created before the other ones in that wiki :P [12:35:47] it's not very helpful to anyone else who visits the history [12:35:51] isn't MediaWiki just assuming that it's the top/last revision when adding another one, because of the timestamp? [12:36:31] as you see, it's sorted by timestamp [12:38:28] soo, who files the bug :) [12:38:56] yes, history action uses rev_parent_id to find out the size of the previous revision [12:39:53] funny, that means that if I edit something based on an old revision [12:40:07] the size difference will be related to that one [12:40:11] not on the one I'm replacing [12:41:01] Platonides: hm, so is rev_parent_id the actual cause of https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45896 too? [12:41:48] not sure [12:43:47] no, it didn... [12:43:51] *didn't [12:49:54] it's probably a bug in the importer, too [12:50:21] as all imported revisions are getting the same rev_parent_id [14:26:23] Lydia_WMDE: where are Phase I, II, III, IV defined? [14:26:41] Nemo_bis: only 1 to 3 - let me get you a link [14:26:57] Nemo_bis: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Technical_proposal [14:27:03] brb [14:27:12] ok [14:27:30] This time I found it in 75 % less effort than last, I might even have not asked :p [14:28:08] eek [14:28:22] ok, I freeze my hopes for sisterprojects for a couple years [14:29:30] Nemo_bis: hmm? [14:29:31] no [14:29:59] when phaseII will be rolled in the projects? (like itwiki) [14:30:20] fale: itwiki hopefully at the end of the month for a first version [14:30:24] but might change [14:30:40] Lydia_WMDE: :) [14:31:11] I also hope that Wiktionaries will get some interlanguage links :P [14:31:27] Darkdadaah: that will come [14:31:56] Yes, I'm sure it will. [14:32:03] :) [15:58:46] FastLizard4|zZzZ: context? [17:33:26] jeremyb_: Context for what? I'm lost :P [17:36:01] 08 00:39:34 < FastLizard4> jeremyb_: To what? [17:36:42] jeremyb_: 06:40:45#wikimedia-tech: < jeremyb_:#wikimedia-tech> FastLizard4|zZzZ: errr, link? [17:37:35] That would be 14:40:45 7 March UTC I think [17:39:20] FastLizard4: errrr, idk? [17:39:31] jeremyb_: Okay :P [19:52:08] AaronSchulz: there're mutiple ways to sort, you already have sorted streams, you just got to merge them ;-D [21:47:21] !log payments cluster update to a6fe052a73 [21:47:27] Logged the message, Master [22:41:43] domas: is there more than one way to sort a cat? [22:42:33] AaronSchulz: There's more than one way to skin one at least ;) [22:42:50] thats a very loaded question!