[00:56:52] <snitch>	 [[Tech]]; MZMcBride; /* Sidebar link script */ +reply; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=4208871&oldid=4206805&rcid=3575916
[01:47:58] <snitch>	 [[Tech]]; Rjd0060; /* Sidebar link script */ ; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=4208967&oldid=4208871&rcid=3575980
[03:14:42] <psneog>	 hi
[07:09:33] <snitch>	 [[Tech]]; Ruslik0; /* Sidebar link script */; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=4209667&oldid=4208967&rcid=3576315
[18:12:41] <multichill>	 apergos: Around? Do you know if it's feasible to raise the tiff thumbnail generation limit?
[18:13:27] <jeremyb>	 multichill: i don't remember all of the details but i'm pretty sure dominic's tried
[18:15:53] <multichill>	 I'm pretty sure we had an upgrade of the thumbnail render software
[18:16:36] <jeremyb>	 i have no idea
[18:17:29] <multichill>	 jeremyb: See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump#Image_scaler_upgrade_test
[18:20:52] <jeremyb>	 multichill: ok but that doesn't really tell me if it can be raised. seems like we should see if it causes issues as is first and then if not we can do a separate test with the limit. but the limit doesn't need as much monitoring as the upgrade. (you don't have to worry about generating incorrect images and then tracking them down and purging after you've reverted the software. just have to worry about overloading something)
[18:21:12] <jeremyb>	 anyway, there's several different limits and i don't remember the difference between them all
[18:21:23] <jeremyb>	 (e.g. there's a PNG one too I think)
[18:21:48] <multichill>	 See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:File_types#Notes
[18:22:33] <jeremyb>	 bbiab