[02:20:02] <logmsgbot>	 !log LocalisationUpdate completed (1.20wmf11) at Sun Sep 16 02:20:02 UTC 2012
[02:20:16] <morebots>	 Logged the message, Master
[10:49:33] <jarry1250|away>	 I don't suppose Chad's lurking in here under some exotic username is he?
[10:50:47] <p858snake|l>	 nah chad is pretty vanilla when it comes to things like that
[11:03:23] <jarry1250|away>	 Reedy: Is the list of core changes to be included in wmf12 finished or will you be updating it again at some point?
[11:38:30] <Nemo_bis>	 sigh we've not yet seen wmf11 bugs fixed and 12 is coming already
[11:40:36] <Krenair>	 Nemo_bis, which bugs?
[11:41:08] <Nemo_bis>	 Krenair: bug supposedly blocking deployment
[11:41:11] <Nemo_bis>	 *bugs
[11:41:21] * Krenair  goes searching for the tracking bug

[11:44:13] <Krenair>	 Nemo_bis, so https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39773 and https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40083 ?
[11:44:25] <Nemo_bis>	 yes
[11:45:27] <Krenair>	 well the second one has a fix awaiting approval - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/23171/
[11:45:30] <Nemo_bis>	 Erik said werdna is going to look at the patch for the second soon
[11:45:33] <Nemo_bis>	 sure
[11:45:39] <werdna>	 I already did
[11:45:45] <werdna>	 if this is what I think
[11:45:52] <werdna>	 look at it
[11:48:11] <Krenair>	 And it looks like the first one I mentioned also has a possible fix, look at comment 6, mainly the last few sentences
[11:48:42] <Nemo_bis>	 werdna: I never said you didn't; thanks for the patchset
[11:49:05] <werdna>	 Nemo_bis: :)
[11:49:58] <Krenair>	 Should the fix for https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40037 be backported to 1.20wmf11?
[11:52:34] <Nemo_bis>	 it's surely quite ugly
[12:17:33] <Nemo_bis>	 what a nice graph https://gdash.wikimedia.org/dashboards/pcache/deploys :(
[12:31:23] <Danny_B|backup>	 rc irc still does not seem to work although status says it does
[12:36:01] <Krenair>	 Danny_B|backup, WFM...
[13:13:22] <Danny_B|backup>	 Krenair: none of the deletions i've done recently were shown
[13:19:02] <jarry1250>	 So are wikis currently on jQuery 1.8 or 1.7.2 after all of that?
[13:53:45] <Krenair>	 jarry1250, 1.8 I believe
[13:53:55] <Krenair>	 Danny_B|backup, you mean they're not logged?
[14:03:20] <jarry1250>	 Krenair: Ah, thanks.
[14:03:52] <Danny_B|backup>	 Krenair: i mean they have not been shown on rc irc
[14:04:22] <Krenair>	 from #mediawiki.wikipedia: <rc-pmtpa> [[Special:Log/delete]] delete  * Frigotoni *  deleted "[[User talk:INI SAMPLER]]": Out of [[Project:About|project scope]]
[14:04:36] <Krenair>	 What wiki?
[14:04:55] <Danny_B|backup>	 cs wiktionary, wikibooks, wikiversity, wikinews
[14:04:58] <Danny_B|backup>	 atm
[14:05:28] <Danny_B|backup>	 cs. wikipedia has last edit shown from 3:41 utc yesterday
[14:06:56] <Krenair>	 On an unrelated note, would someone mind telling me why I keep seeing admins putting HTML comment marks, templates, etc. in block reasons?
[14:07:23] <Danny_B|backup>	 because then it's the long message shown to blocked user
[14:07:27] <Danny_B|backup>	 instead of short one
[14:07:41] <Danny_B|backup>	 the content of templateis displayedy
[14:08:22] <Danny_B|backup>	 anyway, it seems that the irc server somehow got netsplit or whatever - i am on channel and nothing happens, but when i rejoin it, things start to work
[14:09:17] <Krenair>	 There's only one IRC server, no netsplits possible
[14:09:41] <Danny_B|backup>	 "or whatever" ;-)
[14:18:16] <jarry1250>	 Krenair: Presumably they get expanded somewhere?
[14:18:39] <Krenair>	 jarry1250, as Danny_B|backup says, they're parsed when shown to the blocked user
[14:18:59] <Krenair>	 But they're escaped when shown as log summaries
[14:19:04] <jarry1250>	 Ah yes, I probably missed that. 'net keeps dropping out
[14:27:14] <jarry1250>	 Bit low on news for the Tech Report by the way, if anyone has something they want to shout about.
[14:31:06] <DarkoNeko>	 tomorrow an HTML5 option will be enabled
[14:31:19] <DarkoNeko>	 I'm not too sure what difference it will make ^^;
[14:33:20] <jarry1250>	 DarkoNeko: Yup, going to refresh people's memory about that one. I believe the target is that nothing happens.
[14:33:35] <jarry1250>	 Because all existing code is naturally optimised for HTML4.
[14:33:49] <DarkoNeko>	 hmm
[14:34:30] <DarkoNeko>	 is there a selector that choose to switch some tags toward HTML5 depending on the viewer(s user-agent or something like that ?
[14:34:47] <DarkoNeko>	 you know, for universal compatibility an' all
[14:35:02] <jarry1250>	 Browsers are assumed to be capable of understanding their own compatibility
[14:35:16] <jarry1250>	 But we don't have HTML5 tags in core to start with, AFAIK
[14:35:23] <DarkoNeko>	 I see
[14:35:24] <jarry1250>	 There are some tweaks, I think.
[14:35:47] <jarry1250>	 But no actual big gun changes (mw.org's already been on HTML5 for a while)
[14:36:35] <DarkoNeko>	 I mainly see that being used for video/sound/timeline animation, or things related to mobiles
[14:37:57] <jarry1250>	 DarkoNeko: No doubt we'll want to adopt stuff like <video> in time, yeah. I think there's something in TMH regards that actually, but I could be wrong.
[14:38:44] <DarkoNeko>	 TMH ?
[14:38:55] <jarry1250>	 Extension:TimedMediaHandler
[14:39:03] <DarkoNeko>	 aah
[14:48:57] <logmsgbot>	 root cleared profiling data
[15:06:41] <logmsgbot>	 mark cleared profiling data
[15:10:23] <giftpflanze>	 hello, https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ApiSandbox seems non-functional
[15:12:06] <Krenair>	 giftpflanze, WFM
[15:13:15] <giftpflanze>	 wfm?
[15:13:58] <giftpflanze>	 ah, works for you
[15:14:53] <T3rminat0r>	 giftpflanze: any "easy" query I could try?
[15:15:06] <Krenair>	 action=tokens
[15:15:09] <Krenair>	 get your edit token?
[15:15:13] <Krenair>	 query something maybe?
[15:15:50] <T3rminat0r>	 yea, action=tokens type edit works
[15:16:24] <giftpflanze>	 i have no content at all for that page
[15:17:08] <T3rminat0r>	 giftpflanze: maybe try a cache-clear?
[15:20:35] <Krenair>	 giftpflanze, do you have javascript enabled?
[15:21:04] <giftpflanze>	 yes
[15:30:21] <Nemo_bis>	 Krenair: there's a bug about summaries being expanded in enotifs
[15:30:31] <Nemo_bis>	 maybe it's the same root problem
[15:34:56] <jarry1250>	 Was there an explanation for the two request spikes in the last week?
[15:35:15] <jarry1250>	 (I'm looking at -total on Graphite)
[16:38:36] <jarry1250>	 Jasper_Deng: In general, we're pretty much sorted re IPv6, right?
[16:38:47] <Jasper_Deng>	 jarry1250: not quite
[16:38:56] <Jasper_Deng>	 Still some kinks here and there
[16:39:06] <Jasper_Deng>	 Pop-ups, for instance, can't recognize IPv6 editors
[16:40:02] <jarry1250>	 Jasper_Deng: Just user scripts/tools? Or stuff in core as well?
[16:40:31] <Jasper_Deng>	 Well, we're also considering putting addresses lower-case
[16:40:57] <Jasper_Deng>	 and we need a range contribs tool for IPv6
[16:43:57] <jarry1250>	 Jasper_Deng: Okay, thanks
[16:52:00] <Reedy>	 jarry1250: I'll be updating it properly when I build the branch tomorrow
[16:52:09] <Reedy>	 But it's rather out of date
[16:54:42] <jarry1250>	 Reedy: Coolio
[17:53:53] <ThePacker>	 jeremyb: b:40116 are those Images served via the same server? Are those Images avail in filesystem? Is the specific path on this server (assuming they fail on the same maschine) properly mounted?
[17:58:46] <ThePacker>	 jeremyb: I see the user who reported this problem initially changes every single formula. I guess without a working testcase, bug 40116 can be closed again.
[18:01:48] <ThePacker>	 jeremyb: will read the channel log cu.
[21:17:18] <jeremyb>	 !summon thepacker
[22:48:41] <DaBPunkt>	 gn8 folks