[02:18:29] !log LocalisationUpdate completed (1.20wmf10) at Mon Sep 3 02:18:28 UTC 2012 [02:18:40] Logged the message, Master [04:11:14] hi, i'm having a problem where some of my bot's edits aren't showing up on the contributions page, but later edits are [04:12:01] is this a good channel to ask in? or is there a better one? [04:16:51] legoktm: errr, which wiki? [04:16:56] en.wikipedia [04:17:01] legoktm: did other users edit around the same time? [04:17:44] those pages? [04:17:47] no [04:17:58] here's an example edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AEpisode_3_%28Twin_Peaks%29&diff=510354685&oldid=510227434 [04:18:10] contributions link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Legobot [04:18:58] so what's missing? [04:19:14] there are at least 4 edits which aren't showing up on the Contributions page [04:19:45] how do you know they were successful at all? [04:19:56] because they are recorded in the page's history? [04:20:03] huh [04:20:08] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Episode_3_%28Twin_Peaks%29&action=history [04:20:41] um [04:20:45] I think I found the problem. [04:21:14] You just need to search back further. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Legobot&offset=20120902202613&limit=500&target=Legobot [04:21:42] that doesn't make a lot of sense [04:22:03] huh [04:22:05] -facepalm [04:22:15] ohhh [04:22:23] 3 !== 2 huh? [04:22:28] wow my bad [04:22:30] sorry [04:22:52] * jeremyb is sleepy [04:22:53] That's ok. :) [04:22:55] Pine: thanks! [04:26:40] Pine: btw, was still frowning because though I knew your original question (in the channel) was really bad (at least in terms of being able to determine who to send you to ask it. could be interpreted so many ways.), none of the ways I imagined were related to the actual question you had. which brings us full circle to "don't ask to ask, just ask your damn question already" [04:27:15] hello [04:27:26] world [04:27:41] yes? [04:29:01] i guess not [07:36:28] hi! Guten Tag! what happened to toolserver this night? [07:36:48] ��� ������� ����? [07:38:26] Nirvanchik: you would need to ask in the toolserver inregards to that [13:36:56] !log reedy synchronized php-1.20wmf10/resources/jquery/jquery.js 'jQuery 1.8.1' [13:37:06] Logged the message, Master [15:41:48] !log reedy synchronized php-1.20wmf11 'Initial sync-out' [15:41:57] Logged the message, Master [15:42:51] !log sync-docroot [15:42:59] Logged the message, Master [15:44:02] !log reedy synchronized wmf-config/ [15:44:10] Logged the message, Master [15:44:37] !log reedy synchronized php-1.20wmf11/cache/ [15:44:45] Logged the message, Master [15:59:42] !log reedy Started syncing Wikimedia installation... : test2wiki to 1.20wmf11 and rebuild localisation cache [15:59:52] Logged the message, Master [16:00:28] I should really work out why we have to seemingly run scap twice [16:30:00] Reedy: what happens on first run ? [16:30:03] perm error ? [16:30:19] Nope [16:30:36] It builds the new l10n cache from the files of the old one.. [16:30:37] See https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39944 [16:39:50] ahh [16:39:56] I remember Roan talked about that [16:40:35] well anyway [16:40:35] I am off for today [16:40:39] will reconnect later tonight [17:06:50] !log reedy Finished syncing Wikimedia installation... : test2wiki to 1.20wmf11 and rebuild localisation cache [17:06:59] Logged the message, Master [17:18:37] !log reedy Started syncing Wikimedia installation... : rebuild 1.20wmf11 localisation cache [17:18:46] Logged the message, Master [17:48:04] !log reedy Finished syncing Wikimedia installation... : rebuild 1.20wmf11 localisation cache [17:48:13] Logged the message, Master [18:12:30] !log reedy rebuilt wikiversions.cdb and synchronized wikiversions files: testwiki and mediawikiwiki to 1.20wmf11 [18:12:38] Logged the message, Master [18:16:16] Reedy, hashar: I thought deprecated global variables had to remain in DefaultSettings.php to avoid undefined global variable warnings. [18:16:37] No... [18:16:44] Because it's not deprecated, it's completely removed [18:16:55] so setting it in LocalSettings makes no difference [18:17:14] Brooke: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki?action=info ;) [18:17:19] Ah, it won't throw any warnings? [18:17:25] Never mind, then! [18:17:29] \o/ \o/ \o/ [18:18:51] That's so beautiful! [18:19:49] Reedy: When will this go live on en.wiki? [18:19:59] This time next week [18:20:04] roughly [18:20:09] Wonderful! [18:22:27] !log Repointed php symlink from wmf9 to wmf10 [18:22:35] Logged the message, Master [18:25:04] !log Deleting 1.20wmf9 l10n cache from mediawiki-installation [18:25:13] Logged the message, Master [18:26:56] !log Deleting php-1.20wmf8 from mediawiki-installation [18:27:04] Logged the message, Master [18:34:47] !log reedy synchronized live-1.5/ [18:34:55] Logged the message, Master [18:35:13] omg 1.5 [18:35:17] don't trust reedy with shell [18:35:21] he will deploy 1.5 everywhere [18:35:27] It's the future! [18:35:45] 1.5 is bigger than 1.20. Everyone knows that... [18:36:38] lexicographically :) [19:00:50] does anyone know if we have a way to purge thumbnail for a specific picture ? [19:01:01] by users from the wiki ideally [19:01:37] why would you want to do that? [19:03:07] hashar: action=purge? [19:03:20] that what I was wondering [19:04:29] that does purge thumbs if that's what you're asking [19:04:59] ahhh on the File: page :) [19:05:21] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hashar/bug_38299 [19:05:22] ;) [19:05:33] the 500px one was probably already generated and show a gray background:/ [19:05:47] the bug is about using a new font 'Computer Modern' with librsvg [19:05:56] apparently the font is correct [19:06:59] Aaron|home: have thumb been migrated to swift ? [19:07:02] yes [19:07:04] ahh [19:07:12] originals too [19:07:22] that would explain why I can't find the pictures in /mnt/upload6 nor in /mnt/thumbs [19:08:08] yeah, this has stopped being up-to-date; ms5's NFS was creating some problems so MW doesn't write to it anymore [19:08:42] we'll unmount it at some point [19:08:52] do we have any way to list files in a directory ? [19:09:01] or should I use the MediaWiki eval.php command line :) [19:09:33] yeah, you should probably use MW :) [19:09:44] need to figure it out :) [19:44:29] grrr [19:44:32] anyone know about .pfb fonts ? ;) [19:44:50] I installed PostScript fonts Computer Modern to solve https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38299 [19:45:03] cm-super is the package, but it just provides .pfb files [19:45:09] apparently fontconfig does not find them :/ [19:45:37] postscript? old fashioned man [19:45:59] apparently Computer Modern is the defacto standard for math gurus [19:46:07] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Segment_definition.svg <--- math in svg :)) [19:46:20] librsvg can't find it and that piss of our math writers :) [19:46:45] heh [19:46:54] ugh, spacing's off on that too [19:48:42] ahhhhh [19:48:43] fc-match --all|grep -i 'pfb.*computer' [19:48:44] \O/ [19:48:47] font config rocks [19:48:50] bye bye defoma [19:48:52] so I got them [19:48:54] need some aliases [19:51:09] sfsi1000.pfb: "Computer Modern" "Sans Serif Slanted" [19:51:11] yeahh [19:57:11] defoma is obsolete [20:02:48] yup [20:23:07] paravoid: does swift have any tools to check for missing files? [20:23:19] I don't think so [20:23:31] there is a dispersion report tool that uses its own files [20:32:27] I'm still flabbergasted about having to already discover/fix data loss already [20:34:25] shit happens [20:37:33] paravoid: any new dell fixes/failures? [20:49:22] Aaron|home: none of the two, no [20:49:37] but I pushed a rebalance a few hours ago [20:49:48] and waiting for some copies to be created [20:50:25] as for the data loss, it's not sure that we had it, but I'm a bit paranoid with such things [20:50:55] and btw, on the final setup, we'll also have another three copies in eqiad and hence we'll be resistent to this kind of triple failures [21:03:26] out to bed. have a good night [22:38:37] Can anyone tell me why it takes Wikipedia ~15 seconds to pull up a right click in two different browsers? because it's really annoying [22:38:55] and i'm not the only one, someone else had it 3 hours ago too [22:39:12] "pull up a right click" huh? [22:40:54] as in I right click and the mini window takes that long to show, and firefox even gives an unresponsive script warning hoo [22:49:43] gn8 folks