[18:08:46] <Cyberpower678>	 Is there a python guru here right now?
[18:09:03] <chicocvenancio>	 well, I would not claim that, but shoot
[18:09:37] <Cyberpower678>	 chicocvenancio: I'm playing around with Flask right now, but I appear to have an issue.  It seems like a basic issue, but I can't figure out how to fix it.
[18:09:54] <Cyberpower678>	 request is unreferenced, though Flask should be referencing it.
[18:10:02] <chicocvenancio>	 that does sound within my technical capabilities
[18:10:06] <Cyberpower678>	 Thus I can't process GET/POST requests.
[18:10:22] <chicocvenancio>	 is this in WMCS or local?
[18:10:40] <Cyberpower678>	 localhost
[18:10:55] <Cyberpower678>	 I'm playing around with it right ow
[18:11:17] <chicocvenancio>	 is there a line at the top of the file `from flask import request` ?
[18:11:32] <chicocvenancio>	 otherwise, access it as flask.request
[18:12:06] <Cyberpower678>	 See I knew it was something basic. :p
[18:12:08] <Cyberpower678>	 Thanks. :D
[18:12:16] <chicocvenancio>	 you're welcom
[18:12:29] <chicocvenancio>	 s/com/come
[18:54:12] <arturo>	 chicocvenancio: did you see the phab task requestin 2FA reset?
[18:54:25] <chicocvenancio>	 for mmcor? yes
[18:54:37] <arturo>	 did you handle that?
[18:54:45] <chicocvenancio>	 I commented on it, waiting or him to be only again. bryan handled it
[18:54:58] <arturo>	 ok great, thanks both of you :-)
[18:55:07] * chicocvenancio doesn't have access to servers that have ldap access
[20:11:52] <paladox>	 !log git upgraded gerrit-new yesturday night to include a majour new change https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/gerrit/+/128411 + more fixes
[20:11:54] <stashbot>	 Logged the message at https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Nova_Resource:Git/SAL
[20:32:49] <andre__>	 paladox: May I suggest running messages through a spellchecker before logging them? Also you may avoid clickbait: You could replace vague "a major new change" by something descriptive like "a new feature that allows defining in which version(s) a patch is included" or so
[20:33:00] <andre__>	 paladox: Nothing important and nothing to fix in this case, just feedback, for future reference :)
[20:48:42] <paladox>	 ok
[21:45:14] <chicocvenancio>	 andre__: for the paws log GCI task, from a licence pov does phabricator cover it?
[21:45:34] <chicocvenancio>	 s/log/logo/
[22:27:50] <andre__>	 chicocvenancio, context ?
[22:28:22] <andre__>	 chicocvenancio: or... well I remember but...can you rephrase the question?
[22:29:22] <chicocvenancio>	 https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T179677
[22:29:58] <andre__>	 chicocvenancio: What's the question?
[22:30:35] <andre__>	 Oh the one you posted I see. I think I ignore Paws tasks by default :P
[22:31:16] <chicocvenancio>	 The logos proposed by the students, should I consider them to be licensed cc-by-sa by default? 
[22:32:56] <andre__>	 chicocvenancio, urgh. We really did not ask students for a license statement.
[22:32:58] * andre__ slaps himself
[22:33:26] <chicocvenancio>	 Phabricator mentions cc-by-sa on the footer
[22:33:31] <chicocvenancio>	 Or GPL for code
[22:33:53] <chicocvenancio>	 But I'm not sure that covers attached files
[22:33:58] <andre__>	 Hmm, true. Not sure either.
[22:34:12] <andre__>	 Errm.... maybe ask folks who posted a proposal on that Phab task to define a license, and some more info about licenses?
[22:34:19] * chicocvenancio doesn't quite see why it wouldn't but is worried
[22:34:44] <andre__>	 I already added weeks ago to https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Google_Code-in/Lessons_learned#2017 "students must provide sources (URL) and understand licenses and link to the license (URL)"
[22:34:53] <andre__>	 but we failed on that task :-/
[22:35:47] <andre__>	 chicocvenancio, should I add a comment on that task, maybe?