[01:09:54] Change on 12www.mediawiki.org a page Extension:Wikibase Client was modified, changed by Shirayuki link https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?diff=3884173 edit summary: [-1] dummy edit to update translation pages [18:41:53] SothoTalKer: for life [18:42:04] is there some tooling for rdf import to wikidata? [20:05:37] Hi folks. Is there any way on Wikidata to add a qualifier to a property to state that the property has its own Wikidata item? Specifically, I'm trying to add a qualifier to a "distribution map" value, pointing to an image on Commons, to attach it to a Wikidata item for that particular image. [20:08:34] Naypta: if you could provide example Q Id [20:08:37] it would help [20:09:10] sure, so I'm trying to link https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q81068910#P1846 to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q95963597 [20:12:47] Q95963597 makes 0 sense to me really [20:12:50] not sure why it exists [20:13:05] it wouldn't make sense to me either, but for the fact that it's necessary in this case :) [20:13:12] the reason it exists is to centralise the update dates for the map [20:13:34] because at the moment someone is having to go through every single wikimedia site and manually update the update dates every time the map is updated [20:13:44] the idea here is that a single wikidata item can be used to automate the updates of each of them [20:13:46] I see [20:13:53] 🤔 [20:14:10] I initially was trying to do that with just a qualifier on P1846 on Q81068910 but it turns out some Wikidata modules on wikis don't support accessing qualifiers, so here we are :p [20:39:34] nice. VIAF still down [21:31:32] Seems like something that can take jsonld and then update or create items would be pretty useful [21:31:35] 🤔 [21:41:20] Naypta: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q81068910#P1846 [21:41:23] Check those qualifiers [21:41:25] dunno if it helps [21:41:50] brill, cheers! that'll do nicely :) thanks very much, CustosLimen! [21:42:09] now back to fighting Module:Wd on various different wikis where it's not been touched possibly since the wiki was created... [21:42:17] I think "statement is subject of" is better [21:42:19] but dunno [21:42:51] yeah, I tried something like that previously but evidently used a slightly wrong qualifier bc it started shouting at me about it not making sense in that context [21:43:15] "is subject of" seems to make a great deal more sense to my mind