[06:08:33] test [08:26:23] SothoTalKer: oh, I made a start on adapting the previous query I did last night, I didn't get it working before I was too tired to continue but it looks like it should be possible [13:50:17] https://www.eiu.edu/qgisworkshop/geocoding.php For this workshop, we'll use Chicago Hospital Location.csv file. [13:51:57] Can someone work with me on adding this data? like is it public domain enough? if not, if I verify each item against OpenStreetMap to get lat,lon does that make it public? [13:52:45] I'd like to get good at this, but I'm hesitant to start shoveling data alone [15:21:49] Hmh, i wonder who cluttered P949 with so many wrong values o_o [18:40:18] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/Authority_control#Goodreads_work_ID [18:40:21] 🤦‍♂️ [18:40:49] fuckit [18:53:06] so no identifiers unless they are URIs I guess or something [19:05:33] CustosLimen_: EncycloPetey seems to be a bit not on the bright side [21:40:55] I will just leave it [21:41:14] Like litterally every single objection is either without sense or about another property [21:41:17] I don't care [21:41:19] really [21:55:49] CustosLimen_: it's not uncommen for proposals to linger there like forever [21:56:06] yeah I have noticed them [21:56:12] I also fail in this :) [21:56:19] I see a proposal with pages of comments [21:56:24] then I just pass ;) [21:56:27] too lazy [21:56:39] is there a way to go from an edition to the work in goodreads? [21:57:52] ah, there it is [21:58:03] a bit hidden, but yeah [21:59:33] they are not clear [21:59:51] or well, the whole work thing is a bit under the surface [22:00:04] which is kind of dumb because they have people rating editions, and not works [22:00:14] makes no sense [22:00:25] well they rate the books themselves [22:00:43] yes, the books are editions [22:00:46] i think "work" is a too abstract concept for many people [22:01:34] and wikidata is no help, mixing stuff together+ [22:04:25] but i find it kinda funny how like 5-10 people decide what is important and what is not important [22:05:09] like there are some bots that make an item for every crappy "scientific" article [22:05:53] and other people are like: oh, is this book released in the 1920s noteworthy enough to have an item?