[00:48:11] <CustosLimen>	 please voat: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/Goodreads_work_ID
[10:54:39] <CustosLimen>	 ^^^
[10:54:41] <CustosLimen>	 plz
[11:33:19] <Birder>	 hello i just added an eBird hotspot identifier here https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3087343 but at the en.wiki page here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Doon_School shows a red category "ebird hotspot id same as wikidata"...why is that happening? can someone take a look please and remove the red category? i'm new to this...
[11:39:12] <Birder>	 ok, no worries, problem solved
[11:39:21] <Birder>	 by adding parent category
[16:21:54] <SothoTalKer>	 CustosLimen: no >:(
[16:22:49] <CustosLimen>	 SothoTalKer: why not?
[16:24:23] <SothoTalKer>	 Address the issues by Simon, maybe :))
[18:41:51] <CustosLimen>	 SothoTalKer: the domain is already clear
[18:42:21] <CustosLimen>	 okay let me respond to Simon
[18:42:28] <CustosLimen>	 I mean, it really is as clear as I can make it
[18:42:41] <CustosLimen>	 and I don't see why another property being bad should prevent a new property from being created
[18:42:48] <CustosLimen>	 but I will just tell that to simon
[19:50:38] <SothoTalKer>	 CustosLimen: what I personally would do is suggesting a cleanup on the other mentioned property via the talk page there, mentioning the new proposed property
[19:51:26] <CustosLimen>	 I did do that already
[19:51:31] <CustosLimen>	 but really there is not much to clean up
[19:51:37] <CustosLimen>	 ISBN13 is the same
[19:51:54] <SothoTalKer>	 works should not have ISBNs at all
[19:51:55] <CustosLimen>	 ISBN13 is a unique identifier for an edition. but it is used and allowed on works
[19:52:00] <CustosLimen>	 SothoTalKer: they do
[19:52:08] <CustosLimen>	 and it is intended
[19:52:47] <SothoTalKer>	 bad then :P
[19:53:02] <CustosLimen>	 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property_talk:P2969#Clarifying_the_meaning_and_use_of_this_property_instance_of_(P31)_written_work_(Q47461344)
[19:53:26] <CustosLimen>	 same with OCLC control number
[19:53:36] <CustosLimen>	 Either way I will respond to Simon
[19:54:27] <CustosLimen>	 I am not going to start an edition identifier on work items fight on Simons behalf, if Simon wants to have that fight they can have that fight themselves
[21:02:08] <SothoTalKer>	 good luck :)
[21:22:38] <hjb>	 Howdy. https://hub.docker.com/u/wikibase says that https://hub.docker.com/r/wikibase/wdqs-updater is DEPRECATED, but https://github.com/wmde/wikibase-docker/blob/master/docker-compose.yml still pulls it in. 
[21:22:53] <hjb>	 Which one should i trust?
[21:23:29] <CustosLimen>	 I always trust my mom
[21:23:47] <hjb>	 Go ask her and tell me her answer :)
[21:36:09] <hjb>	 Anyone here who has a better advice?
[21:40:23] <Reedy>	 deprecated doesn't mean you can't use it
[21:42:45] <hjb>	 Reedy: true. I'm at a stage where i don't know if i need to use it, and what it is good for ;)
[21:43:20] <Reedy>	 I'd file a bug in phab and complain at the Wikidata developers that things are inconsistent
[21:47:10] <hjb>	 Reedy: good advice, i'll do that
[21:47:13] <hjb>	 thanks
[22:16:03] <CustosLimen>	 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property_talk:P2969#Clarifying_the_meaning_and_use_of_this_property_on_instance_of_(P31)_written_work_(Q47461344)
[22:17:20] <CustosLimen>	 Like herding cats