[02:52:22] reosarevok: i have added RISM identifier to my script now, too :D [13:02:58] Is there any particular reason why visited links in the Query Service aren't marked as visited? [13:56:06] So I guess this is a common practice now? https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q61653989#identifiers [13:57:01] sjoerddebruin: The "named as"? [13:57:05] yeah [13:57:22] I hope so, it's quite useful to detect wrong matches :) [13:57:39] Or for this pseudonym case [14:05:45] sjoerddebruin: what if a records provides multiple names for this entity? [14:05:54] multiple qualifiers? [14:06:53] isni for your item lists both his pseudonym and real name. [14:08:28] hmm, https://viaf.org/viaf/291515706/ [14:08:33] what about this itentity? [14:08:34] http://www.isni.org/0000000083688533 [14:08:55] shall all listed variants be added via "named as"? [14:09:05] the others should be added as https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P4970 [14:10:07] viaf just picks a random name from the list, it seems :D [14:10:19] not really random [14:10:27] it picks the prefered one [14:12:02] preferred based on what :) [14:12:39] preferred by the authority control organisation [14:14:24] ok, random then :) [14:23:26] i wished we could define one preferred standard way of transliteration of foreign script names [20:18:46] SothoTalKer: I can understand you now... I have https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q61653917 and https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q61677366 but now I have no idea where to leave the mixed http://viaf.org/viaf/171402768/ [20:18:53] I guess wait for them to fix their mess?