[00:33:23] hm, is there an easy way to report an IP for vandalism? (: [00:39:40] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/205.151.163.28 [00:41:32] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/67.70.245.251 [01:26:09] http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q2075584 [01:26:13] oops :p [01:42:35] Lookin good! 👍 [01:42:37] :D [06:03:48] i just LOVE it when VIAF links to the wrong wikidata item :P [06:13:23] i wonder if those errors are ever rectified [06:29:31] PROBLEM - puppet last run on wdqs1006 is CRITICAL: CRITICAL: Puppet has 1 failures. Last run 4 minutes ago with 1 failures. Failed resources (up to 3 shown): File[/etc/rsyslog.d/10-puppet-agent.conf] [06:32:01] http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q28559 [06:55:39] RECOVERY - puppet last run on wdqs1006 is OK: OK: Puppet is currently enabled, last run 34 seconds ago with 0 failures [15:07:02] erm why is a bot editing logged out? [15:07:02] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/172.16.1.252 [15:08:14] eek [15:08:17] I think that’s a toolforge IP [15:08:58] and I think that’s even on the new grid, not the old one [15:09:30] I think it’s yifeibot? [15:10:52] I’m leaving a message on the talk page [15:10:57] unless someone else is on it? [15:11:01] (private account activity obvs) [15:12:29] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User_talk:YiFeiBot#editing_anonymously [15:13:45] revi: perhaps change the block message to point to that talk page? or did you contact anyone elsewhere already? [15:13:58] not yet [15:14:02] ok [15:14:18] it could be someone else, I’m not *sure* it’s yifeibot [15:14:18] Will change block msg [15:14:28] but that’s my best guess so far [15:14:29] or just WD:PC or WD:AN? [15:14:36] AN seems best IMO [15:14:37] might also work [15:14:41] feel free to move my message there [15:14:53] i'm autopatrolling to not higher the backlog even more... [15:14:58] (I should be working right now 😬) [15:15:08] let's think this is also part of Work [15:15:14] ^^ [15:15:15] since it's Wikidata! [15:15:21] wörk wörk wikidata wörk [15:15:59] well I just blocked IP only so anyone using that server while logged in should have no problem [15:16:15] ok good [15:16:52] I wonder if anonymous edits from Toolforge IPs shouldn’t be blocked in general… [15:17:02] IMO that should be blocked [15:17:06] or perhaps they even are, and this only wasn’t blocked because it’s the new grid [15:17:31] (some context on the new grid: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/cloud-announce/2019-January/000122.html ) [15:19:34] omg [15:19:35] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Special:Contributions/172.16.1.252 [15:19:49] one day won't be enough since that report was filed few days ago [15:20:01] the section above you goes above the same IP [15:20:06] about* [15:20:39] yeah [15:20:44] that's what I was referring to [15:21:33] coffee needs to work... [15:24:46] See no other in the range on http://wikidata.wikiscan.org/?menu=dates&filter=ip&sort=weight&date=201901&list=users [15:31:00] hm, is there an easy way to report an IP for vandalism? (: [15:31:10] i just LOVE it when VIAF links to the wrong wikidata item :P [15:31:16] i wonder if those errors are ever rectified [15:33:07] VIAF made some bad matches, they take over our corrections though [15:49:07] revi: turns out they’re supposed to be blocked, yes, see https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/485843 [16:00:49] sjoerddebruin: so, if i move a VIAF ID from one person to another, they will update their links? :) [16:00:56] yes! [16:01:04] and if there are multiple ID's, they'll merge! [16:02:29] i don't think this merging is an automated process [16:09:27] Single values: Violations count: 12142 (+ 5 exceptions) [17:35:35] sjoerddebruin: I guess you have been busy doing other things too? I noticed https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Database_reports/without_claims_by_site/nlwiki grew a bit [18:12:26] how would you classify two people that act together as writers: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q16662097 [18:12:40] under one pseudonym [18:13:00] easiest would be "group of people" [18:43:32] SothoTalKer: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q10648343 ? [18:44:11] multichill: I've started as Wikimedian-in-Residence (need to update my LinkedIn, hehe), have been focussing on genders and birth dates. Trying my best soon to lower no claims down. [18:44:18] could work. [18:45:00] multichill what about https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q15618652 ? [18:45:43] I don't know why we have two items for duo [18:45:54] And I'm not going down that rabbit hole ;-) [18:46:02] and we have https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q16017119 [18:46:15] there's nothing to see here, move along [18:46:27] guess that is the correct one ^ [18:47:00] Yeah, nice one Sjoerd [18:47:17] oi [18:47:26] Oh, so we're finally going to complete the Hoogleraren Sjoerd? [18:47:37] And other relevant scientists. ;) [18:47:47] Do we actually a good non messed up item for that? [18:48:05] I recall some German user who promoted everyone to professor some years ago [18:48:21] we need to take a good look at that yeah [18:49:02] collective pseudonym creates constraint violations, but meh :D https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q16662097 [18:49:11] Take for example https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q92621 . I had him as a Hoogleraar (full professor) and he's been emeritus for a while [18:49:41] I can't really find that on the item [18:50:13] I mostly indicate that with "ending cause" as qualifier on P106 [18:50:17] P108* [18:51:48] well, if he was professor at one time, one could use start time and end time with that property? [18:52:19] same like with "spouse" [18:52:39] yeah plus that [18:53:21] or one makes a separate property for "professor at" [18:53:38] sjoerddebruin: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P803 wut? [18:53:46] dunno if professor is an occupation or a position. [18:53:52] yeah that property is a mess [18:54:20] not every professor is in a named chair in the Netherlands... [18:54:51] No. I like position more for full professors [18:55:07] ( https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P39 ) [18:55:28] rectors [18:55:53] eh, i continue my ground work, i hate those theoretical debates :p [18:56:24] I put Andy on my watchlist so looking forward what you're making of it Sjoerd [18:58:37] multichill: btw, is that date detection script still working for Wikipedia, there are still a lot of mayors without dates on Wikidata [18:59:41] eg https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Diepenhorst [18:59:44] What script was that exactly? Something I ran once or twice ? [19:00:09] Yeah, to retrieve birth and death dates from articles without infobox but have a clear syntax [19:01:19] pweh, I wonder where I left that. I'll get back to you about that one [19:02:07] i think it was like three years ago [19:13:12] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q51213808 is quite annoying for queries [19:34:37] these don't make sense... https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q825236 [19:55:29] ey can a wd admin tell me what this was https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q60290086&action=edit&redlink=1 [19:56:22] Soccer player without proven notablity [19:57:10] spammer* [19:59:26] sjoerddebruin: what was the name? [20:46:29] sjoerddebruin: is that notable? :p https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q60786886 [20:46:54] enough trustable external identifiers [20:48:13] good :)