[00:49:56] <nikokkk>	 Hi everybody. I have a question about the query web
[00:50:14] <nikokkk>	 https://thepasteb.in/p/Z4hPvQ2mwn1sG
[00:50:20] <nikokkk>	 when entering this query
[00:50:31] <nikokkk>	 i get 158 results.
[00:51:13] <nikokkk>	 Netherlands (Q55) and Kosovo(Q1246) are not showing. why?
[00:51:47] <nikokkk>	 they do have the statement for (wdt:P31) wd:Q6256
[00:51:56] <nikokkk>	 instance of country
[00:54:02] <WikidataFacts>	 because they have a different P31 statement with a higher rank
[00:54:10] <WikidataFacts>	 wdt: only matches best-rank statements
[00:57:17] <nikokkk>	 thanks for your answer
[00:57:29] <nikokkk>	 is there a way to ask for all ranks?
[01:08:03] <WikidataFacts>	 yes, by using full statement nodes https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikibase/Indexing/RDF_Dump_Format#Full_statements
[01:08:17] <WikidataFacts>	 i. e. ?country p:P31/ps:P31 wd:Q6256
[01:49:50] <nikokkk>	 that's working. Thank you!
[01:49:57] <WikidataFacts>	 you’re welcome :)
[01:51:07] <nikokkk>	 I guess the query first fetches the statements and then gets the value for each statement. It doesnt work with just p:P31 or ps:P31 alone, so I guess the double predicate is needed
[01:52:14] <WikidataFacts>	 yes
[01:52:31] <WikidataFacts>	 p:P31 points from the subject entity to the statement node, ps:P31 points from the statement node to the value
[01:53:44] <nikokkk>	 I am new to wikidata and i like it very much. 2 questions: is there a set of tuples to download that is the automatically generated one from wikipedia metas? I guess most of the statements are generated automatically from wikipedia meta data. But i see a lot of manual modifications too. And i see a lot of vandalism or very approximate choices for s
[01:53:44] <nikokkk>	 tatements....
[01:55:02] <nikokkk>	 it is not that easy to keep a good coherent database here. it seems that miss-editing is going to be more damageable in wikidata than in wikipedia... what is the official position of your teams on that?
[01:55:20] <WikidataFacts>	 oh, I don’t officially speak for Wikidata
[01:55:24] <WikidataFacts>	 the nick is just to confuse people ;)
[01:55:26] <WikidataFacts>	 (sorry)
[01:55:28] <nikokkk>	 have you thought of restricting modifications? i guess it goes against the spirit of wikimedia foundation
[01:56:32] <nikokkk>	 if you have a personal opinion, i am taking it too :)
[09:01:39] <hires>	 hello. 
[17:20:06] <SothoTalKer>	 Would it be possible to block that IP/User? https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q6112225&action=history
[17:23:51] <sjoerddebruin>	 SothoTalKer: blocked the account, i would assume it would autoblock the IP...
[17:24:34] <SothoTalKer>	 We'll see, i guess :p
[17:24:41] <SothoTalKer>	 and thanks
[17:24:44] <sjoerddebruin>	 added it to my watchlist
[20:22:30] <SothoTalKer>	 bleh. looks like the library of canada changed their format for authorities in VIAF (or VIAF switched it)
[20:23:07] <sjoerddebruin>	 mmm?
[20:23:59] <SothoTalKer>	 before the entries were listed as "LAC|0101J2853" for example.
[20:24:23] <SothoTalKer>	 Now it's CAOONL|ncf10038289
[20:24:52] <sjoerddebruin>	 interesting
[20:24:53] <SothoTalKer>	 https://viaf.org/processed/CAOONL%7Cncf10038289
[20:25:11] <SothoTalKer>	 This means, the json only contains the new version: http://viaf.org/viaf/24602065/viaf.json
[20:25:25] <SothoTalKer>	 What we store in wikidata is heading 016
[20:27:54] <SothoTalKer>	 oh well, more manual work :)