[17:05:07] Q29990350 is duplicate to Q29990351 only the latter has been merged with the zh.wiki entry by me - so what to do with Q29990350 ? [17:11:49] <[1997kB]> katpatuka: articles linked to them seems different [17:13:32] oh no :/ - well spotted [17:14:25] <[1997kB]> the merge you just did, is about river and those other two have different coord's, so I think we can keep them. [17:14:52] sv and ceb imported a lot from geonames I guess... [17:15:09] [1997kB]: the text is the same though [17:15:49] and they are both in the same county - I'm mapping on osm there in the moment... [17:16:08] <[1997kB]> what I am saying is that we should keep separate item for river and two separate items for those coordinated pages [17:16:43] <[1997kB]> merging river's item with coordinate one doesn't seems ok. [17:18:44] sv and ceb wikis use strange names for those geoname imported items anyway - coordinates in title I mean [17:21:56] <[1997kB]> indeed they are strange [17:25:09] that's the difficult thing with import: fixing, merging, redirects are often needed [17:29:27] Howdy [18:00:27] <[1997kB]> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_rat this article have no item attached, but it still showing interwiki link? [18:23:47] <[1997kB]> nikki: ^ [19:59:31] hi, I am wondering if it is still necessary to get approval for a bot that only fixes a few hundred (obvious) typos or removes (.*) from labels. FischBot already has a flag and adding these statements also could be added with QuickStatements without bot flag. [19:59:53] e.g. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Bot/FischBot_7 [20:13:03] for a small one-off run, I don't see a problem with it [20:21:46] nikki: Ok, then I'll go ahead and make the edits [20:28:00] [1997kB]: there's often a delay between links being added or removed in wikidata and the wikipedia pages updating, when that happens, manually purging the page should fix it