[15:37:40] It's crazy. https://grafana.wikimedia.org/dashboard/db/wikidata-datamodel-statements?refresh=30m&panelId=4&fullscreen&orgId=1&from=now-6M&to=now [17:25:20] sjoerddebruin: in the long run it looks like an exponential function would fit best. we're doomed :p [17:26:18] Second law? [17:29:50] mhm [17:30:27] well, data will grow faster and faster :)) [18:23:02] do we not have a guideline saying to use singular rather than plural labels? I thought we did [18:23:07] but I don't see anything on help:label [18:27:44] seems logical to me, as we use them in statements [19:51:02] PROBLEM - High lag on wdqs1003 is CRITICAL: 3601 ge 3600 https://grafana.wikimedia.org/dashboard/db/wikidata-query-service?orgId=1&panelId=8&fullscreen [19:53:12] PROBLEM - High lag on wdqs1003 is CRITICAL: 3611 ge 3600 https://grafana.wikimedia.org/dashboard/db/wikidata-query-service?orgId=1&panelId=8&fullscreen [19:57:33] PROBLEM - High lag on wdqs1003 is CRITICAL: 3632 ge 3600 https://grafana.wikimedia.org/dashboard/db/wikidata-query-service?orgId=1&panelId=8&fullscreen [20:57:20] Is there any way to add a sense with an item link but without a gloss? [20:58:08] I want to use https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Lexeme:L502 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P5137 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q15343 but I can't come up with a good gloss :p [20:59:08] how about doing something useful instead ;p [20:59:32] I already did that, so it's this or looking at cat pictures [20:59:44] why not look at real cats ;) [21:00:18] Because my cat is not in town (or well, *I'm* not in town) so I can't :p [21:01:06] aww, ok [21:01:34] i'll continue with my spreadsheet then. [21:01:57] reosarevok: any news when the eesti authority control goes fully online, though? :) [21:02:08] Nope [21:02:45] i hope they won't do it like ireland [21:12:34] reosarevok: "egg-laying mammal, scientific name ..."? it doesn't have to be perfect, it can be improved later [21:13:57] like even just "animal" would work, especially since someone will be able to see from the item link which one you mean [21:15:25] and a sense that gives you some sort of hint is better than no senses at all [21:20:27] so "sense" is more or less meant like a disambiguation [21:22:10] I don't think there's much of a consensus on exactly what it should be [21:23:48] if they're just disambiguations, then we have nowhere to put actual definitions, but at the same time people won't want to write full definitions constantly to be able to link senses [21:42:02] I still feel it's weird not to be able to say "exactly this item" [21:42:07] I mean, the item will have all the info [21:42:23] Why can't I give *either* language + gloss *or* item [22:20:15] reosarevok: choice by design :)