[11:52:52] Is https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P106 really supposed to be used for hobbies? It feels a bit weird to have, say, a professional tennis player and someone who plays tennis with friends on Sundays listed in the same way [14:28:31] no [15:15:43] there are no quallifiers for quallifiers, right? [15:23:03] How big is the current JSON dump uncompressed? Not sure if I have enough disk space to download and extract it :) [15:26:33] can i just remove a constrainet from a property if i think its rubbish? [15:26:36] frickel: No. If you feel you need that, it could inidcate that the first qualfiier should actually be a normal statement [15:27:33] frickel: I would at least start a dicsussion on the property talk page before removiing things [15:28:56] tobias47n9e: turns out there already is a discussion about that [17:11:55] hai [17:14:07] how would I list sanctions in wikidata? [17:24:07] how do I cite in wikidata? [17:45:36] quorioji, what are "sanctions"? [17:46:01] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/sanctions [17:54:17] We do have https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P1596 for the negative cases. [18:02:35] hmm [18:02:37] not great [18:02:59] how can I see everything linking to an entity: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q50883373 [18:03:26] I have 3 addresses for this entity: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q50882310 [18:03:36] 29, Bolshaya Morskaya str., St. Petersburg 190000, Russia; 37 Plyushchikha ul., Moscow 119121, Russia; 43, Vorontsovskaya str., Moscow 109044, Russia; [18:05:43] can I use wikidata items as references in wikipedia? [18:32:38] I tried this in wikipedia: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Source_MetaData [18:32:41] but it does not work [18:57:56] I hacked together a little something around wikipedia called wikimark [18:59:28] it allows to compute the relatedness of an URL to wikipedia vital articles [18:59:37] here is the HN link: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16668215 [18:59:51] Direct Link: https://github.com/amirouche/wikimark [19:00:19] While working on this, I took me quite a while to find out about the vital articles [19:00:44] https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/page/html/Wikipedia%3AVital_articles [19:01:12] I am mostly interested in the structured hierarchical categorization of the articles [19:01:23] And I figured, that there is no similar thing in wikidata... [19:10:55] Cite Q does not pull url [22:18:10] hoo: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Artix_Kreiger&redirect=no#Please_slow_down blocked him again [22:23:31] 210 edits per minute doesn't sound like a single run. [22:23:59] And we desperately need some semi-automated edits guidelines, maybe nice to discuss in Barcelona. [22:32:50] Yeah, I really doubt that's a single run [22:34:17] Coming to Barcelona Sjoerd? [22:34:26] Yes, otherwise I wouldn't suggest it. :P [22:59:59] sjoerddebruin: Hoe staat het eigenlijk met https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Database_reports/without_claims_by_site/nlwiki ? [23:00:07] Geen tijd voor gehad. [23:00:35] Heb mijn handen vol aan nieuwe personen op nlwiki. [23:03:28] Laatste loodjes zijn het lastigst zo te zien. De nieuwe aanwas wordt steeds wel weggewerkt.... [23:04:50] sjoerddebruin: Fijn, al die Eurovisie meuk komt ook weer binnen. Hebben we daar al een standaard voor? [23:05:24] it still looks like a mess https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21065149 [23:10:39] Would be nice to have a reference item to use to normalize the others