[01:35:53] <Krinkle>	 Lydia_WMDE: Please prioritise for tomorrow :) - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T189329#4055461
[08:27:57] <Lydia_WMDE>	 Krinkle: :/ I thought people were on it already. But it seems Marius handled it for now thankfully. Sorry for the trouble.
[13:44:36] <reosarevok>	 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q16408568 - facets seem right? (this had no statements, think that's the best I can do)
[14:27:18] <sjoerddebruin>	 Hm... https://twitter.com/aylin_cim/status/974358113326370821
[14:27:24] <sjoerddebruin>	 Lovely, those usage instructions.
[14:28:58] <Lucas_WMDE>	 hooray
[14:35:44] <sjoerddebruin>	 Really something we should battle this year.
[14:54:49] <sjoerddebruin>	 oh, viaf broke
[15:54:20] <egonw_>	 hi all, anyone here who has looked at SpringerNature's SciGraph?
[15:55:50] <egonw_>	 they have some mappings to Wikidata, and was thinking of proposing a property for their SciGraph identifier ...
[15:57:48] <egonw_>	 e.g. c0a2b42ad0f8102a7d435514573a4219 is the SciGraph ID for Q6294930
[21:03:58] <SMalyshev>	 we have a property to put usage instructions in. But since it's not displayed in search, nobody uses it and embarrassing usage instructions in descriptions persist
[21:07:26] <sjoerddebruin>	 Indeed, but search isn't enough. I have the feeling people don't tend to read suggestions and just think of some property label, so it should be more visible in the UI than that.
[21:38:04] <Krinkle>	 Lydia_WMDE: Thanks :)
[21:41:40] <Platonides>	 finding the right property for the concept you want is relatively hard
[23:14:38] <SMalyshev>	 anybody here from WMDE lexeme team per chance?