[08:44:52] Really annoying that you can't see what statement has been edited. https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Property:P1959&curid=21964282&diff=624384827&oldid=618599273 [09:10:53] Is there a ticket for that already? [09:23:52] * reosarevok happily submits some coordinates. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Bot/EstonianHeritageBot2 [12:53:17] I just found this while looking for items with lots of constraint violations: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?oldid=623879446#P50 [12:53:37] perhaps someone would like to tell this user how “author” is supposed to be used? :/ [12:53:45] (I shouldn’t do it, at least not from my WMDE account, sorry) [13:05:07] Lucas_WMDE: any reason not to tell him to create an item for each book? (not sure what the restrictions on "notable" books are) [13:05:11] * reosarevok is writing [13:05:39] if there are sources, they’re notable afaik [13:05:46] and there seem to be sources on the statements [13:05:49] (thanks!) [13:06:57] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User_talk:Mlvandijk#"Author"_property,_P50 - if I forgot something important shout [15:39:47] Lucas_WMDE: "(use on works, not humans)" is already in the description, what we need is a better efficient abuse filter so we can give people clear instruction uses. [15:40:29] I’d also love to have T140131… [15:40:30] T140131: Show text from Wikidata usage instructions property (P2559) when auto-suggesting properties or items - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T140131 [15:40:51] * Lucas_WMDE ← abusefilter noob [15:42:00] Yeah [15:42:17] oh, does it do regex matching on the internal page content? (“rlike” in https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:AbuseFilter/63) [15:42:27] that sounds like it could be optimized for Wikidata, yeah [15:42:28] Yup, very slow. [15:42:36] OH [15:42:48] because added_lines is probably the entire page content on entity pages, I suppose [15:42:56] I don’t think we put line breaks in those JSON blobs :/ [15:43:59] Did you try out the recoin gadget btw? [15:44:08] The property suggestions are so much better. [15:44:48] oh, it changes the property suggestions? [15:44:49] I still think it's a terrible UX choice to hide the identifiers section when it's empty. Both sections should always exist and have specific suggestions. [15:44:52] or do you mean the ones at the top of the page? [15:45:07] It gives hints at the top of the page yeah, and some indicator in the right corner. [15:45:19] (I wish they could just replace the suggestions) [15:45:31] yeah, it works pretty well [15:45:58] There is only a 10 min delay on new/empty items, but for the rest it works pretty fast. [15:46:54] Lydia_WMDE: btw, also interesting for you! we failed the property suggester goal last year, not sure what are the plans now that amir is focusing on the code [15:48:26] Lucas_WMDE: also something: abuse filters don't work with item creations, so if people add a Wikitionary link with the Special:NewItem parameters, it doesn't show up in the logs [16:00:37] Auregann_WMDE: found it, https://twitter.com/robbi5/status/955448973388640256 [16:01:55] Lucas_WMDE: Yay \o/ [17:54:07] talking about abuse filters, some of them seem now redundant with the constraint violation system [17:55:54] how hard would it be to add a tag "edit introduces new constraint violation" or something like that? [17:56:07] I guess it would be quite useful for ORES [17:59:37] (ah I can't find it anymore but saw a filter that was checking VIAF ids for their format) [18:02:05] ah, here is one: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Topic:Tkiwlisv2wlgym41 [18:02:20] sorry, https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:AbuseFilter/96 [18:16:17] pintoch: probably difficult (T165722 is somewhat related, I think) [18:16:18] T165722: Integrate constraint reports into recent changes and watchlist - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T165722 [18:19:57] ah right, makes sense [18:26:57] Helping VIAF once again: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q46700280 [18:27:14] (I let the bot handle the correct BnF code, it's complicated as fuck https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/User:Inductiveload/BnF_ARK_format) [22:31:55] DanielK_WMDE: ping?