[08:57:52] <wiki85jesse>	 Hi all, I’m still pretty new to Wikidata. I have a question. I work for an institution with a large authority file (GTAA, it’s already partly aligned with Wikidata). We would like to make more alignments and we have a tool (CultuurLINK) that enables us to probably make more such links. However, it only works with RDF-data and it only works with datasets that are available fast (SPARQL is too slow for instance). if we'd want to download the en
[08:57:53] <wiki85jesse>	 set of humans (instances (p31) of human (q5)) (4 million+ names) how could we do that? We have a tool to match datasets, but API/SPARQL is too slow, so we need to import them in some way. Do you have any suggestions? Many thanks!
[08:58:54] <wiki85jesse>	 I have tried the following SPARQL query: SELECT ?person ?name ?lastname WHERE {
[08:58:55] <wiki85jesse>	 	?person wdt:P31 wd:Q5 .
[08:58:56] <wiki85jesse>	   ?person wdt:P735 ?name .
[08:58:58] <wiki85jesse>	   ?person wdt:P734 ?lastname .
[08:58:59] <wiki85jesse>	 }
[08:59:00] <wiki85jesse>	 LIMIT 1000000
[08:59:01] <wiki85jesse>	 OFFSET 1000000
[08:59:24] <wiki85jesse>	 but I got no results
[09:55:30] <pintoch>	 wiki85jesse: if you want all humans, then the easiest is probably to download the JSON dump and filter it locally
[10:23:37] <Jhs>	 wiki85jesse, that query lists _only_ people who have both first name and family name set
[10:24:00] <Jhs>	 and lists from the first million results
[10:24:20] <Jhs>	 but only 443 945 items have family name set
[10:24:25] <Jhs>	 which is why you don't get results
[10:26:48] <Jhs>	 wiki85jesse, if you remove "OFFSET 1000000" you will get some results, but fewer than 443 945
[10:27:55] <wiki85jesse>	 thanks! I will consider the JSON dump also. Isn’t it strange that the name cannot be called forward in a query?
[18:07:17] <sjoerddebruin>	 Hm, is the pawprint of a cat a valid signature? https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1386318
[18:15:24] <Lucas_WMDE>	 sjoerddebruin: wow, the header image looks really terrible for some reason
[18:15:30] <Lucas_WMDE>	 not sure if something went wrong during upscaling?
[19:01:00] <reosarevok>	 sjoerddebruin: IMO yes, if it's how the article he "produced" was signed
[19:01:45] <sjoerddebruin>	 https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Property%3AP109&type=revision&diff=621553240&oldid=607153212 :0
[19:02:57] <reosarevok>	 :D
[22:24:42] <sjoerddebruin>	 multichill: almost the 5th of January of 2013...
[22:35:17] <multichill>	 :-)
[23:54:12] <audiodude>	 Hello. In the "famous people by eye-color" sample query, what part of the query determines that the person is famous?
[23:54:25] <audiodude>	 is it just assumed that we only know the eye color of sufficiently famous people?