[06:55:16] live vote summary for community wishlist - https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2017_Community_Wishlist_Survey/Tracking [06:56:55] live vote summary for community wishlist - https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2017_Community_Wishlist_Survey/Tracking [06:57:10] 11 hours left to cast a vote [06:57:26] Cartography has a strong lead ) [10:20:38] leszek_wmde: Amir1: Daniel called me. He is stuck in a train and will be in the office at 4pm. [10:21:10] Thiemo_WMDE: ok thanks [10:21:12] Cool [10:53:26] So the German trains are also not nice during the snow. :P [10:59:25] also, Germans aren’t nice to Deutsche Bahn during the snow ;) [10:59:43] “what, how can this little bit of snow disrupt train service? why couldn’t they anticipate that it could snow?” [11:04:50] The sad thing is that people also think like that about people jumping in front of the train. [11:24:11] Jonas_WMDE: I updated https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/394070 . The only failure is the browser test. Would be cool if you can look into this. Or leszek_wmde. [11:24:35] yeah I saw it [16:12:47] Is it possible to get a sparql query to return results in the same order as it's listed on the actual wikidata site? e.g. http://bit.ly/2Ababsi if you look at the wikidata page you'll see United Kingdom is listed first [16:15:22] jackiewackie: no, that’s not possible – statement order is not meaningful [16:15:37] what about reference count? [16:15:39] if there is an inherent order between the values of a property, it can be specified using “series ordinal” qualifiers [16:15:50] but I don’t think that would be appropriate in this case [16:16:04] well in this case the refewrenc count is higher for UK than US indicating it's probably UK [16:16:04] reference count would be possible, sure [16:16:09] so if i could retrierve and sort by that it might be better? [16:16:33] but I disagree that it should mark one value as “better” [16:17:17] if the US statement is incorrect, it should be deprecated or removed [16:17:22] You might be right [16:17:41] But i dont really have any other metric over which one is proably more accurate [16:17:41] or if both statements are correct, but the country of origin is “mainly” the UK, then that statement could have preferred rank [16:17:44] Is it more UK than US :P [16:17:59] in this case it is [16:18:13] and with the different ranks, the query would only return UK [16:18:43] Are you saying this is data that is stored, or the record should be edited? [16:19:10] I’m sorry, I don’t understand your question… [16:19:23] the statement(s) on Wikidata would be edited [16:21:50] Could you help me sort by reference count for nwo then? I don't want to rely on someone having ranked the data as i think in this case it's unlikely [16:23:04] Im just looking for an example in the docs first [16:24:31] jackiewackie: http://tinyurl.com/y8ctfz6f [16:25:52] is it not possible to keep the countryLabel? [16:26:04] adding it breaks the aggregate [16:26:16] you need to add it to the GROUP BY as well [16:26:32] perfect, thank you [16:26:37] no problem :) [16:26:47] do you have any examples of wikidata pages where the rank is used on properties? [16:26:58] just so i can look into adding support for that into my query later on [16:27:17] population statements of many countries or cities, for example [16:29:14] also, several of the results on https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AWhatLinksHere&target=Q21124171&namespace=0 have multiple “date of death” statements [16:31:02] where is the rank stored/displayed though [16:31:10] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21124702 e.g it's not visile here [16:32:03] the little arrows to the left of the value [16:32:20] see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Help:Ranking#How_to_apply_ranks [16:58:34] DanielK_WMDE: Please check the latest version of the docs/entity-storage.wiki patch out. [19:08:50] hello, how to add a link to an external wiki? [20:49:32] Hullo. How do I cite the Wikibase/DataModel ? [20:49:46] That's the same core data model Wikidata uses, amiright? [20:50:21] Also, who want to help me build a semantic document core data model ? [20:50:31] I grow tired of working alone. [21:47:41] * reosarevok sighs https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q505728&type=revision&diff=607292924&oldid=381959423 [22:00:13] reosarevok: wut [22:00:48] Since September, sigh [22:00:59] (took a quick look at the mandatory constraints page) [22:17:19] :D [22:19:14] Sigh [22:19:22] sjoerddebruin: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q55168 - do I just remove all of the "filmography"? [22:19:48] I see what they were going for, but... [22:20:41] Yep... [22:20:56] People don't read descriptions. [22:25:15] Ok [22:29:43] How do I link this to the person? https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1802702 [22:30:09] (found it when removing "picture of grave") [22:30:38] Mostly just https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q1802702&type=revision&diff=607312755&oldid=607312571 [22:31:02] Oh, ok. I had the idea "of" was kinda deprecatedish [22:31:14] Not (yet). [22:31:38] Similarly: this is an article for "chronology of the life of X" [22:31:51] I can use "of", but what's the actual p31? Chronology seems to be the science [22:33:14] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q18340550 or https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q186117 ? [22:34:23] (heh, turns out image of grave should allow pigeon too https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q6781039 )