[03:02:39] PROBLEM - wikidata.org dispatch lag is higher than 300s on www.wikidata.org is CRITICAL: HTTP CRITICAL: HTTP/1.1 200 OK - pattern not found - 1948 bytes in 0.112 second response time [03:42:39] RECOVERY - wikidata.org dispatch lag is higher than 300s on www.wikidata.org is OK: HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 200 OK - 1923 bytes in 0.112 second response time [14:34:38] Quite smart shortlink embedder http://myf.red/g/fenB ( the short url is embedded when exporting a graph to image) [15:42:06] sjoerddebruin: Gaat lekker, op naar 2012? ;-) [15:42:19] Wellicht volgende week. [15:51:16] Average of 8 statements tomorrow. \o/ https://grafana.wikimedia.org/dashboard/db/wikidata-datamodel-statements?refresh=30m&panelId=4&fullscreen&orgId=1 [15:51:22] We have to update the slides every month. [15:52:31] It's crazy how we grew with 10 million items in the last three months. [15:52:56] We just passed 20 million edits this month. http://wikidata.wikiscan.org/date/201709/stats [15:53:08] (compared to 10 million last year) [16:13:30] sjoerddebruin: I think I got everything with a Q id higher than 18M [16:14:55] So that will be nov 2014 [16:15:28] So we basically got everything in the 20M and 30M range [16:16:28] I'm working on the bottom part now (top is making me frustated at time) and https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/duplicity.php?wiki=nlwiki [16:17:00] But first, let me order pizza. [16:20:07] sjoerddebruin: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q2662041&type=revision&diff=569337828&oldid=287909958 <- huh? [16:20:28] Dafuq. [16:22:28] Lots of weird things going on. https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q12491145&action=history [16:24:41] Blocked, sneaky vandalism also on enwp [16:25:54] Can you look at those other edits as well ^ [16:25:57] The other user and the ip [16:33:59] I blocked a couple of other accounts too [18:46:28] Now I know why I hated creating new items for Wikipedia's... https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q1202972&action=history [20:22:29] What for mess is this? https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2558684 [21:00:39] PROBLEM - puppet last run on wdqs1005 is CRITICAL: CRITICAL: Catalog fetch fail. Either compilation failed or puppetmaster has issues [21:01:40] mmm [21:07:24] probably just flaky ;) [21:09:05] hehe [21:09:19] Have you worked out the entitysuggester error yet? [21:10:33] Am literally just looking [21:10:50] I limit it 2500m memory [21:10:54] Ah, then my keylogger is running correctly. ;) [21:10:56] seems that's no longer enough [21:11:02] Oh dear. [21:11:16] Well we grow 10 million items in three months. [21:11:47] yeah :/ [21:12:08] am bumping it to 3500m an re-running [21:12:35] but not sure I'll apply that, might as well re-do it with the next dump on Monday [21:12:38] but let's see [21:12:43] * after Monday [21:13:03] Yeah, since we got like 5 million edits per week.. [21:13:43] In a more perfect world, I guess I'd do that once per week [21:14:06] There is something called automatization. [21:14:47] I could automize a little more of the process, I guess [21:15:13] but will always require some manual steps, due to security requirements and the workaround stuff [21:16:29] Oh, I see that someone made a Phabricator task for the issue that I described earlier. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T173406 [21:16:49] Oh, and lovely mentions of Phabricator pastes. [21:18:29] What is required to make it work for properties statements, btw? [21:20:25] Quite a bit, I'm afraid [21:20:31] it uses numeric entity ids everywhere [21:20:46] thus no way to distinct properties from items [21:20:55] Not unfixable, but it's a bit of work [21:22:45] although this might not actually be a problem, if we just mix them in [21:22:50] (not as much) [21:24:29] Ah. [21:27:50] RECOVERY - puppet last run on wdqs1005 is OK: OK: Puppet is currently enabled, last run 13 seconds ago with 0 failures [21:34:36] Should a short discussion in project chat do for changing those probability values? [21:52:19] sjoerddebruin: Which? My change is still in the works :S [21:52:36] The one to higher the impact of classifying ones? [21:52:46] You said that it needed a community discussion.