[09:03:36] <jsjsjs1111>	 Hello
[09:03:44] <jsjsjs1111>	 Can any admins help?
[09:06:20] <desperek>	 jsjsjs1111, dont ask if you can ask, just ask
[09:07:19] <jsjsjs1111>	 [[Q34508]], under constant vandalism by IPs since last year.
[09:07:19] <AsimovBot>	 10[1] 10https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q34508
[09:07:29] <jsjsjs1111>	 Can you semi-protect it?
[09:07:43] <jsjsjs1111>	 *Could you
[09:07:44] <desperek>	 jsjsjs1111, now refer to topic how to get attention of an admin (/topic)
[09:08:38] <jsjsjs1111>	 How to use that?
[09:08:54] <jsjsjs1111>	 (/topic)
[09:09:11] <desperek>	 /topic
[09:09:14] <desperek>	 to show topic
[09:09:21] <jsjsjs1111>	 When I type "/topic" it says "Insufficient arguments for command."
[09:09:26] <desperek>	 oh
[09:09:46] <desperek>	 jsjsjs1111, anyways use !admin to get attention of an admin
[09:09:55] <jsjsjs1111>	 !admin
[09:10:41] <desperek>	 i dont really know how that system work so i guess you have to wait now?
[09:13:15] <jsjsjs1111>	 OK, I will.
[18:00:08] <nikki>	 sjoerddebruin: that's just bizarre
[18:00:21] <sjoerddebruin>	 ikr
[18:38:31] <Lydia_WMDE>	 <3
[18:49:14] <sjoerddebruin>	 Lydia_WMDE: <3
[18:49:24] <Lydia_WMDE>	 :)
[18:49:42] <Lydia_WMDE>	 have you checked out the constraints gadget yet?
[18:50:21] <sjoerddebruin>	 You are asking that to me?
[18:50:55] <sjoerddebruin>	 I think I've tested since day 1.
[18:52:00] <Lydia_WMDE>	 :D
[18:52:03] <Lydia_WMDE>	 excellent
[18:52:24] <Lydia_WMDE>	 I have to shamefully confess that I only got around to really really using it yesterday
[18:52:44] <sjoerddebruin>	 Shame on you. :0
[18:52:55] * Lydia_WMDE burries head in shame
[18:52:57] <Lydia_WMDE>	 :D
[18:53:19] <sjoerddebruin>	 I would love https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T167700 to speed up my workflow.
[18:53:24] <Lydia_WMDE>	 But! to make up for it I fixed quite a few issues and constraints definitions
[18:53:39] <Lydia_WMDE>	 hah yeah
[18:54:05] <Lydia_WMDE>	 so i am a bit worried that people use it to just make the violation go away without really checking if that is the right thing to do
[18:54:21] <sjoerddebruin>	 I can understand.
[18:54:35] <Lydia_WMDE>	 so i'd like to roll it out first without it and then find a way to see if this is actually causing problems or if i worry too much
[18:54:39] <Lydia_WMDE>	 not sure yet how
[18:54:50] <sjoerddebruin>	 Maybe roll it out based on edit count, or is that hard to do?
[18:55:00] <sjoerddebruin>	 Or you can limit it to rollbackers.
[18:55:01] <Lydia_WMDE>	 worth a try
[18:55:04] <Lydia_WMDE>	 yeah
[18:55:07] <sjoerddebruin>	 Those are trusted users as well.
[18:55:14] <Lydia_WMDE>	 right
[18:55:30] <Lydia_WMDE>	 actually let me add that as a comment
[19:04:35] <sjoerddebruin>	 :3
[19:33:33] <nikki>	 Lydia_WMDE, sjoerddebruin: would be nice to tag the edits as coming from the gadget too
[19:34:11] <Lydia_WMDE>	 ah also not a bad idea
[19:34:22] <Lydia_WMDE>	 adding to ticket
[21:33:21] <YairRand>	 has anyone ever done a scan for weird invisible characters on labels? I just found a label with several "‎" characters at the beginning and end.
[22:40:17] <YairRand>	 how does one add labels/sitelinks with quotes in them in quickstatements?