[19:23:12] Hi folks, do you think the reference for "Dewey Decimal Classification" on this item (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q77) legit? I mean, edition(s): unknown value? [20:08:57] glorian_wd: this is not useful. it was inserted 2015-04-16 by an anon user: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q77&diff=211053319&oldid=210181723 [20:10:16] MisterSynergy: okay. I guess I will revert it then [20:12:32] yes. only 83 out of 14407 claims have the P747 qualifier [20:13:10] http://tinyurl.com/yavgt6x3 [20:13:39] MisterSynergy: hi :). never saw you active at IRC [20:14:16] MisterSynergy: yeah. It's also strange that someone put that in the reference instead of qualifier [20:15:59] hey Sagan! I'm not here that often [20:16:23] and when I'm here, I'm mostly inactive ;-) [20:16:36] ah :D [20:16:40] and you're not at -de :D [20:17:28] there is a de-version of the wikidata channel?! [20:17:50] no, sry, I meant #wikipedia-de [20:18:19] #wikipedia-de is not that useful. lots of offtopic chat [20:19:03] hm, yup [20:19:08] glorian_wd: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21928852#P1036 [20:19:13] I'm not really active there too [20:20:02] MisterSynergy: Yeah. Notice that in https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21928852#P1036, edition(s): unknown value is in qualifier, instead of reference [20:20:22] earlier, in the 'Uruguay' revision, edition(s): unknown value was in the reference [20:20:28] correct, but still "unknown value". [20:20:35] yepp, I saw [20:20:44] that was definitely a mistake by the anon user [20:20:50] yeah. My concern was, that edition(s): unknown value in the reference, instead of qualifier [20:21:02] probably someone vandalized it? :/ [20:21:10] okay, I though you were complaining about the ''unknown value'' [20:21:16] I don't think so [20:22:18] I never saw this P1036 property and I am not sure about this qualifier, but at a glance it looks like some reference-related thing