[01:50:20] SMalyshev, hi, any updates on the bots? [02:04:42] yurik: not really, waiting for flag on tabulist, otherwise it's mostly ready. can be improved of course, but basics are there [02:05:11] SMalyshev, cool, what about the copy bot, any luck with that? [02:05:11] the other one didn't do much lately, didn't have time, but may finish it up soon [02:05:29] awesome :) [02:05:31] it's mostly working but needs some testing iirc [02:05:34] let me know if i can help in any way [02:05:42] github repo or something? :) [02:06:55] don't see much love in https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Bots/Requests/TabulistBot btw [02:07:44] yurik: the sources for the copy bot are at github.com:smalyshev/clonebot [02:28:38] is there a better way / place to seek help for my 'Wikimedia\Rdbms\SessionConsistentConnectionManager not found' issue? I don't want to spam this chat but I'm kind of at a roadblock :-/ [08:50:35] I am going to reboot CI Jenkins soonish. For a few minutes [11:23:38] Amir1: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Contact_the_development_team#Access_to_.22Wikis_subscribed_to_this_entity.22 <- can you answer to this? :) [11:30:57] Lydia_WMDE: sure [11:31:04] thanks! [11:39:53] Amir1: Ladsgroup, is that you? [13:37:10] aude: the latest wikidata build apparently broke tests somehow :( [13:37:20] oh [13:37:20] Fatal error: Call to undefined function WikibaseQuality\ConstraintReport\Tests\Specials\SpecialConstraintReport\both() [13:37:42] I know what is wrong :] [13:42:15] https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/340975/1/zuul/parameter_functions.py ! [13:42:25] autoload-dev was only injected for wikidata [13:48:30] Ehm, should dead at birth children be included in https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P1971? [13:53:25] sjoerddebruin: Since there is also ‘children who lived to adulthood’, I would think that it would make send to include any that were ‘born’, even if stillborn, there. [13:53:30] *sense [13:54:24] I agree. [13:56:17] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q25345691 [13:56:50] Not sure, I think should actually be a ‘subclass of’ [13:58:44] I agree with that as well. [13:58:57] In that there were, specifically, different ‘models’, and then different instance of each [13:59:41] aude: fixed :] [14:00:35] sjoerddebruin: Thing is, that then gives a constraint error, when they are used as ‘armaments’, in that it somehow does not realize they are weapons. [14:00:41] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:ConstraintReport/Q3241668 [14:00:44] Ah! [14:01:10] I think it’s a property missing somewhere farther up the chain. [14:02:58] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property_talk:P520 Ah, yeah, I see I think. [14:03:10] hashar: \o/ [14:03:35] The problem being that I don’t yet have the info for the specific ‘instance of’ items… Mark 1 Mod 2, or whatever. [14:46:43] Hey… [14:46:55] Why is https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P155 an instance of “Wikidata qualifier” [14:47:14] TBH, this seems to create a constraint violation on basically ever item that uses it. [14:48:20] See https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:ConstraintReport/Q118 for example… that “April” follows “March” is a constraint violation. [14:49:57] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P156 does not seem to have the same issue [14:53:23] Yeah, apparently the problem is not that it’s a ‘qualifier’, it’s something else (shrugs) [18:55:51] Hi WD!