[00:12:56] http://tinyurl.com/z5ug4rn <- only 117 places in USA named after a person? [00:13:03] what's wrong? [00:17:48] yannf: it’s only 86 distinct results actually if I’m not mistaken [00:18:04] with P131+ instead of P131 you get 185 instead: http://tinyurl.com/z7u4kln [00:18:18] still not much… not sure which part of the data is likely to be missing [00:18:42] for France only, I get 5673 streets [00:19:41] and 14,873 results if I use P131+ [00:23:00] 32173 results in the US without the “named after” part [00:23:57] but many of them do look like they aren’t named after a person (Alabama State Route 27, Interstate H-201, Fifth Avenue, Great River Road) [00:24:27] are streets less likely to be named after people in the US? How many results does France have without “named after”? [00:25:18] we need more named after [00:25:59] 54025 with P131+ [00:26:55] okay, so that’s over a quarter of all streets being named after a person (as far as the data is in Wikidata) [00:27:35] results may be biaised as people have created entries for all streets of Paris, even the smaller ones [00:27:46] but still... [00:28:31] you forget about the netherlands yannf [00:28:46] sjoerddebruin, ? [00:29:04] every street in NL has a item [00:29:10] only rivers there, no street ;oD [00:29:16] rip [00:29:43] sjoerddebruin, yes, I saw many entries for streets in NL [00:32:10] I don't understand P131 vs. P131+ [00:34:21] ?x wdt:P131+ ?y means that there’s a “path” from ?x to ?y via P131 statements, but it can be arbitrarily long [00:34:26] could just be ?x wdt:P131 ?y [00:34:37] could also be ?x wdt:P131 ?intermediate. ?intermediate wdt:P131 ?y [00:35:08] ?intermediate could, for example, be a suburb [00:35:39] or there could be two elements in between, ?x is located in a quarter which is located in a suburb which is located in a city [00:35:46] (city = ?y) [00:38:08] wdt:P279*, which you see all the time in ?item wdt:P31/wdt:P279* ?class, is the same thing, except the * means that the path could be 0 elements long too [00:38:20] so that means ?item has P31 of something. that something could be the ?class [00:38:29] or it could be something a subclass of the class, with P279 [00:38:35] or a subclass of a subclass of the class, and so on [01:05:17] WikidataFacts, thanks, I'll copy that somewhere [12:21:42] * Josve05a wish there was a tool that could just import info from commons artwork-templates to new items on wikidata [12:28:22] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q27832267 :) [12:29:26] Josve05a: publication date? [12:29:42] is that the wrong property? [12:30:09] Mostly we use inception for paintings... [12:31:26] hmm...feels odd (at least when thinking of it from a copyright perspective...) [12:31:48] sjoerddebruin: feel free to change :) [12:32:06] Yeah, also this probably: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q27832267&type=revision&diff=406176657&oldid=406176019 [12:32:41] might have been created (inception) over many years , who knows, but it was published on 31 May 1887 at least... [12:32:52] Description says "Signed & Dated " [12:33:26] true, but it is usually not published before it is signed... [12:34:58] hmmm [12:42:22] Josve05a: Yeah, we use inception for works of art [12:42:53] Josve05a: Did you already find https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Visual_arts/Item_structure ? [12:43:09] It's quite extensive [12:43:26] no, I hadn't [12:43:32] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Visual_arts/Item_structure#Describing_individual_objects is the most useful part I guess [12:44:53] sjoerddebruin: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Database_reports/without_claims_by_site is now at 21.000 for nlwiki, shall we organize some sort of "eindsprint" at some point? ;-) [12:45:13] The last ones are probably hard though. [12:45:34] Yes [12:51:49] I don't know the title... https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q27832298 [12:52:27] Same as the description, I think [12:53:01] * Josve05a won't add things without at least having had someone else claim it first [12:54:12] * Josve05a get edit conflicted :p [12:54:28] :O [12:55:42] Josve05a: Looks an awful lot like https://rkd.nl/en/explore/images/146168 , but has different attribution and different collection... [12:56:38] yes indeed [12:56:51] Maybe a copy? [12:57:16] Think so, it's a post death portrait [12:57:43] yeah [12:58:32] Josve05a: I've been mass importing paintings for quite a while. I keep track of the collections I did at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Multichill#Indexed [12:58:53] Using the data from the source seems to work much better than to use commons [13:01:27] Josve05a: I do requests in case you have a collection in mind you would like to have on Wikidata ;-) [13:02:09] nah, I don't know much about art collection...I'm just doing some PD reviews via [[c:Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/PD-Art review]] [13:02:09] 10[2] 10https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:WikiProject_Public_Domain/PD%2DArt_review [13:02:13] collections* [18:49:16] * aude waves [22:22:42] aude, how soon are we going to have federated wikibase? :D [23:44:55] Hinweis für Administratoren: Die 2-Faktor-Authentifizierung ist jetzt auf der Seite Special: Preferences verfügbar. Einige englische Wikipedia-Administrator-Accounts wurden vor kurzem kompromittiert. Bitte beachten Sie daher die Aktivierung der 2-Faktor-Authentifizierung. [23:45:39] Notice to administrators: 2-factor authentication is now available in your Special:Preferences page. Some English Wikipedia administrator and functionary accounts have been compromised recently, so please consider setting up 2-factor authentication.