[09:59:24] <sjoerddebruin>	 The average statements per item just hit the 5-milestone. https://grafana.wikimedia.org/dashboard/db/wikidata-datamodel-statements?panelId=4&fullscreen&from=now-6M&to=now
[10:25:05] <Lydia_WMDE>	 \o/
[11:05:02] <Harmonia_Boulot>	 hello Lydia_WMDE !
[11:07:20] <sjoerddebruin>	 <3
[11:28:08] <Lydia_WMDE>	 :)
[13:55:55] <nikki>	 Lydia_WMDE: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Contact_the_development_team/Archive/2016/10#One_site_link_per_item_limitation_.28again.29 got archived again :/
[13:56:12] <Lydia_WMDE>	 nikki: bah :(
[13:56:20] <Lydia_WMDE>	 will look after meeting
[14:02:01] <nikki>	 ok :)
[15:54:01] <Tulsi>	 @Sysops
[15:54:10] <Tulsi>	 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Other_rights#Tulsi_Bhagat
[18:55:20] <sjoerddebruin>	 multichill: hey, did you run the P&P <-> BP lately?
[18:59:50] <multichill>	 hey sjoerddebruin, no I haven't
[19:00:08] <multichill>	 Let's see what happens if I fire it up
[19:00:09] <sjoerddebruin>	 Could you do, together with genders? I think there are like 500 waiting. ;)
[19:02:53] <multichill>	 sjoerddebruin: Running the bot now. The gender bot should run every night
[19:03:17] <multichill>	 Keep an eye on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Multichill/Zandbak , it will report there
[19:08:58] <multichill>	 sjoerddebruin: I'm probably going to revive the noclaims bot to work on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Database_reports/without_claims_by_site/nlwiki and similar reports
[19:15:21] <sjoerddebruin>	 Would be great.
[19:15:58] <sjoerddebruin>	 I was doing other stuff the last few days in Berlin. ;)
[19:17:10] <multichill>	 On https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gebruiker:NoclaimsBot/Template_claim is what it would add based on the template
[19:17:44] <multichill>	 Back when I started this, the problem was getting an up to date list of items to work on. That's easy now
[19:23:54] <multichill>	 sjoerddebruin: Done, see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Multichill/Zandbak . Time to create some items or you're still doing some more matching? ;-)
[19:24:22] <sjoerddebruin>	 344 to do
[19:26:49] <multichill>	 Hmm, people like http://www.parlement.com/id/vg09ll4gkozs should just be created I guess?
[19:31:03] <multichill>	 sjoerddebruin: Linking everyone to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2785415 is going to be fun...
[19:31:19] <sjoerddebruin>	 Yeah, manual work probably.
[19:31:25] <sjoerddebruin>	 Will need a member item first.
[19:33:38] <mutante>	 so when editing musicians/artists and comparing the infobox on WP to Wikidata, i notice we usually have "associated artists" linked on WP, but we have no property for that on Wikidata yet, or do we?
[19:34:14] <multichill>	 "three people didn't show up because they were dead" , ouch
[19:35:02] <mutante>	 sorry, it's called "associated acts"
[19:35:45] <multichill>	 mutante: We do have https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P941 and https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P737
[19:36:15] <nikki>	 that sounds a bit too vaguely defined for wikidata... I would expect us to have more specific properties
[19:36:41] <multichill>	 Yeah, and derive it with LUA magic
[19:37:00] <multichill>	 Or a funky sparql query
[19:37:26] <mutante>	 hmm, i see, while that makes sense, it also means i cant directly translate the infoboxes
[19:37:50] <mutante>	 i won't be able to tell who is "influenced"(-by) somebody or "just" associated
[19:38:27] <mutante>	 maybe the real question is the usefulness of the current info in the boxes
[19:39:00] <mutante>	 or maybe MusicBrainz does that work for us already
[19:39:10] <mutante>	 and we just keep linking to their artist ID
[19:39:18] <mutante>	 i dunnp
[19:41:00] <nikki>	 I just had a quick look at a couple of pages and it looks like some of them are other groups that one of the members was in
[20:00:41] <mutante>	 yea, i agree it's a vague term to be "associated"
[20:01:01] <mutante>	 but i also see a bit of a value for finding similar artists
[20:16:32] <nikki>	 nooo... no more autolist :(
[20:21:29] <sjoerddebruin>	 woah
[20:24:05] <Stryn>	 sad day :(
[21:11:34] <Nemo_bis>	 happy for petscan
[21:38:39] <nikki>	 I still find petscan too overwhelming and stressful to actually be able to do anything with it
[21:42:24] <nikki>	 it's good that people who were happily using it already can continue using it and I imagine magnus is happy that he has one less thing to maintain, but it's a sad day for me and wikidata since that's one more tool people can't use it any more to contribute