[04:24:56] &$&$ JOIN #wikimedia-ayuda &$&$ [04:27:49] &$&$ JOIN #wikimedia-ayuda &$&$ [09:10:53] Hey guys, I try to get the markup from a wikidata page via the api but I cant figure out the right parameter. I can get the page's ID, but not the markup. [09:17:23] AlexK: What do you mean by markup? [09:17:40] the actual page's code. I just figured that for some reason, the API Sandbox does not do that [09:17:54] if I use the same action link for the real API, it returns me the markup.... [09:18:23] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Contact_the_development_team#Changes_in_GUI [09:20:28] hoo: do you want to merge all of the cognate things then ? ;) So that I can start on another round of changes? ;) [09:20:49] sjoerddebruin: Replying [09:21:01] addshore: Will have a look later today (when in the train) [09:21:23] hoo: cool! [09:21:39] sjoerddebruin: Weird… this was merged more than a week ago… usually people are quite fast with that. [09:22:09] Well I've missed it... [09:22:32] hm :/ [09:22:49] Not sure how to properly do that with new message keys [09:23:00] sending mails to wikidata-tech sounds very psammy [09:23:16] Well it is okay to include in the weekly summary I think. [09:23:58] https://translatewiki.net/w/i.php?title=Special%3ATranslations&message=Wikibase-statementlistview-add&namespace=8 [09:24:02] Might be worthwhile [09:24:12] I'll add a note to my to do list about starting a discussion [09:24:18] got to go in a sec :/ [09:25:11] I feel like the only one translating there. :( [09:25:29] hm :( [09:26:09] Added a note to myself [09:26:14] It would be great if all stuff was under the Wikidata section there I think. Some things are pretty hidden, like the value widgets. [09:26:26] I'll start a discussion soon, unless someone beats me to it (feel free to) [09:26:38] hm, I can guess [09:26:45] Can you create a bug for that? [09:27:11] Maybe. [09:27:23] Would be nice [09:27:34] otherwise ping me again later today and I'll handle it :) [09:29:04] see you o/ [09:41:23] Jonas_WMDE: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgMaxAnimatedGifArea#Explanation [09:50:02] * sjoerddebruin is in the train at this time next week <3 [09:51:58] hello Wikidatians, I spotted a batch of entities that were imported from Commons that would need to be merged with pre-existing entities https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:SPARQL_query_service/queries/examples#A_batch_of_entities_that_were_imported_from_Commons_that_would_need_to_be_merged_with_pre-existing_entities [09:52:05] feel like giving a hand to merge them? [09:53:46] caveat: the pre-existing entity often has a Category set as Commons sitelink, making the merge fail [09:55:16] so, for the one I merged, I deleted the Category link before merging, then everything goes fine [10:04:22] hm, the page is becoming too big [15:44:58] hey there [20:31:46] Spanish Wikipedia sure likes it's American TV. I'm finding so many new items there..... [20:55:29] Hi! I would like to convert a wikipedia list of dutch parliament members (for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_members_of_the_House_of_Representatives_of_the_Netherlands,_2010%E2%80%9312) to wikidata. Not sure about the format. Any advice or example? Can I just make a new list item or should I add the info to individual parliament member items? [21:03:08] bartromgens: I'm not quite sure what you're trying to do... the page seems to already be linked to a wikidata item [21:03:29] multichill: weren't you and sjoerd doing something with dutch politicians? [21:05:31] nikki: I want the information of the list; which person was part of which parliament (person, start-time, end-time), in wikidata. [21:10:02] ah... that would normally be stored on the items for the people (e.g. "position held" and "member of political party" on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q381657) [21:17:38] nikki: Yes, that is what I thought. It just seems a lot more work to do it like that :) But I understand why it is better that way. Will just have to write some code to make sure it is correct and complate. Thanks for your answer! [21:22:05] you're welcome :) [21:23:53] you might want to get in touch with sjoerddebruin (on wiki, or in here... he's usually around and I'm not sure why he isn't right now :P), I think he'd be interested and might already have some saved queries or something for checking the data [21:25:19] aha, his user page does mention dutch politics, good to know I wasn't imagining things [21:30:05] :) Yes, he did stuff with our parliament! I will send sjoerddebruin a message on his talk page. Thanks again. [21:39:50] nikki: Yup, we are [21:41:02] bartromgens: You can seen an overview at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sjoerddebruin/Dutch_politics/Tweede_Kamer [21:43:20] bartromgens: Zie ook https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiproject/Nederlandse_parlementsleden/Voortgang [22:18:03] Hello! [22:18:35] Is "instance of" property appropriate to use when a poetic work is a part of an anthology that's compiled later by someone else? [22:21:08] Even "part of" seems to be not applicable at that case. [22:21:35] eepsiter: I would put “has part” on the anthology, I think [22:23:46] WikidataFacts: Hmm... The anthology is so disconnected in this case - the anthology is so significant but those who were included would have survived at pretty much the same state regardless of their inclusion. [22:23:50] I'll they that one. [22:23:56] WikidataFacts: Thank you. [22:24:26] you’re welcome [22:25:39] WikidataFacts: Are there any proposals for a new property that is better for that purpose? They call it inverse of P361. [22:25:48] the inverse* [22:26:03] "part of" [22:27:16] not that I know of [23:53:00] PROBLEM - Response time of WDQS on einsteinium is CRITICAL: CRITICAL: 12.50% of data above the critical threshold [300000.0] [23:55:00] PROBLEM - Response time of WDQS on einsteinium is CRITICAL: CRITICAL: 12.50% of data above the critical threshold [300000.0]